INBX vs. FIVE
INBX (Inhibrx, Inc.) and FIVE (Five Below, Inc.) are both stocks. INBX operates in Biotechnology (Healthcare), while FIVE operates in Specialty Retail (Consumer Cyclical). Over the past year, INBX returned 540.30% vs 46.44% for FIVE. At a 0.19 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
INBX vs. FIVE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, INBX achieves a 12.82% return, which is significantly higher than FIVE's -0.99% return.
INBX
- 1D
- 2.44%
- 1M
- -33.66%
- YTD
- 12.82%
- 6M
- -4.68%
- 1Y
- 540.30%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
FIVE
- 1D
- -2.09%
- 1M
- -16.42%
- YTD
- -0.99%
- 6M
- 6.80%
- 1Y
- 46.44%
- 3Y*
- 0.23%
- 5Y*
- 0.09%
- 10Y*
- 15.35%
INBX vs. FIVE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
INBX Inhibrx, Inc. | 12.82% | 412.99% | 10.63% |
FIVE Five Below, Inc. | -0.99% | 79.46% | -20.30% |
Correlation
The correlation between INBX and FIVE is 0.16, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.16 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 30, 2024 | 0.19 |
Fundamentals
INBX:
$1.39B
FIVE:
$10.37B
INBX:
-$8.40
FIVE:
$7.93
INBX:
1.06K
FIVE:
2.04
INBX:
$1.30M
FIVE:
$5.08B
INBX:
-$508.00K
FIVE:
$1.77B
INBX:
-$117.63M
FIVE:
$757.48M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
INBX vs. FIVE — Risk / Return Rank
INBX
FIVE
INBX vs. FIVE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Inhibrx, Inc. (INBX) and Five Below, Inc. (FIVE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| INBX | FIVE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +3.01 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +3.49 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.67 | 1.23 | +0.44 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 14.10 | 1.89 | +12.21 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 36.07 | 8.48 | +27.60 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| INBX | FIVE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 4.21 | 1.20 | +3.01 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.00 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.33 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.51 | 0.34 | +1.17 |
Drawdowns
INBX vs. FIVE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum INBX drawdown since its inception was -39.84%, smaller than the maximum FIVE drawdown of -76.40%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for INBX and FIVE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| INBX | FIVE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -39.84% | -76.40% | +36.56% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -38.66% | -24.71% | -13.95% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -74.13% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -76.40% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -76.40% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -37.16% | -24.71% | -12.45% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -16.96% | -23.20% | +6.24% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 15.08% | 5.50% | +9.58% |
Volatility
INBX vs. FIVE - Volatility Comparison
Inhibrx, Inc. (INBX) has a higher volatility of 26.07% compared to Five Below, Inc. (FIVE) at 18.13%. This indicates that INBX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FIVE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| INBX | FIVE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 26.07% | 18.13% | +7.94% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 62.17% | 29.44% | +32.73% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 129.72% | 39.05% | +90.67% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 100.66% | 47.93% | +52.73% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 100.66% | 46.13% | +54.53% |
Dividends
INBX vs. FIVE - Dividend Comparison
Neither INBX nor FIVE has paid dividends to shareholders.
Financials
INBX vs. FIVE - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Inhibrx, Inc. and Five Below, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
Frequently Asked Questions
INBX and FIVE have a correlation of 0.16, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
INBX has higher volatility (26.07%) compared to FIVE (18.13%). In terms of maximum drawdown, INBX dropped -39.84% vs FIVE's -76.40%.
INBX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.21 vs 1.20), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for INBX and FIVE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer