PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IMV.L vs. MVEU.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

IMV.L vs. MVEU.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in iShares Edge MSCI Europe Min Volatility UCITS (IMV.L) and iShares Edge MSCI Europe Minimum Volatility UCITS ETF EUR (Acc) (MVEU.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

IMV.L is traded in GBp, while MVEU.L is traded in EUR. To make them comparable, the MVEU.L values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with IMV.L having a 5.80% return and MVEU.L slightly higher at 5.99%. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with IMV.L having a 7.94% annualized return and MVEU.L not far ahead at 7.98%.


IMV.L

1D
0.44%
1M
0.05%
YTD
5.80%
6M
5.96%
1Y
10.53%
3Y*
11.63%
5Y*
7.18%
10Y*
7.94%

MVEU.L

1D
0.50%
1M
-0.08%
YTD
5.99%
6M
6.28%
1Y
10.48%
3Y*
11.60%
5Y*
7.13%
10Y*
7.98%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IMV.L vs. MVEU.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
IMV.L
iShares Edge MSCI Europe Min Volatility UCITS
5.80%17.66%6.63%8.56%-7.83%13.68%1.50%16.37%-2.91%13.29%
MVEU.L
iShares Edge MSCI Europe Minimum Volatility UCITS ETF EUR (Acc)
5.99%17.63%6.71%8.45%-8.16%14.46%1.57%15.47%-2.87%14.16%

Correlation

The correlation between IMV.L and MVEU.L is 0.93, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.93

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.95

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.95

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.93

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 30, 2012

0.92

The correlation between IMV.L and MVEU.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.92 to 0.95 - a consistent structural relationship.

IMV.L vs. MVEU.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
IMV.L
MVEU.L

Financial Services

17.9%
17.6%

Industrials

16.2%
15.6%

Consumer Defensive

13.8%
14.1%

Healthcare

12.6%
12.3%

Utilities

10.2%
10.1%

Communication Services

8.8%
9.0%

Energy

7.1%
6.9%

Basic Materials

5.2%
5.1%

Technology

3.5%
3.4%

Consumer Cyclical

3.4%
3.6%

Real Estate

1.6%
1.5%

Financial Services

IMV.L
17.9%
MVEU.L
17.6%

Industrials

IMV.L
16.2%
MVEU.L
15.6%

Consumer Defensive

IMV.L
13.8%
MVEU.L
14.1%

Healthcare

IMV.L
12.6%
MVEU.L
12.3%

Utilities

IMV.L
10.2%
MVEU.L
10.1%

Communication Services

IMV.L
8.8%
MVEU.L
9.0%

Energy

IMV.L
7.1%
MVEU.L
6.9%

Basic Materials

IMV.L
5.2%
MVEU.L
5.1%

Technology

IMV.L
3.5%
MVEU.L
3.4%

Consumer Cyclical

IMV.L
3.4%
MVEU.L
3.6%

Real Estate

IMV.L
1.6%
MVEU.L
1.5%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IMV.L vs. MVEU.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IMV.L
IMV.L Risk / Return Rank: 3232
Overall Rank
IMV.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3535
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IMV.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 3333
Sortino Ratio Rank
IMV.L Omega Ratio Rank: 3636
Omega Ratio Rank
IMV.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 2828
Calmar Ratio Rank
IMV.L Martin Ratio Rank: 2828
Martin Ratio Rank

MVEU.L
MVEU.L Risk / Return Rank: 3131
Overall Rank
MVEU.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3333
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MVEU.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 3131
Sortino Ratio Rank
MVEU.L Omega Ratio Rank: 3131
Omega Ratio Rank
MVEU.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 3030
Calmar Ratio Rank
MVEU.L Martin Ratio Rank: 3232
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IMV.L vs. MVEU.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Edge MSCI Europe Min Volatility UCITS (IMV.L) and iShares Edge MSCI Europe Minimum Volatility UCITS ETF EUR (Acc) (MVEU.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


IMV.LMVEU.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.02

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.03

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.22

1.21

+0.01

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.23

1.25

-0.02

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

3.55

3.71

-0.17

IMV.L vs. MVEU.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IMV.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.15, which is comparable to the MVEU.L Sharpe Ratio of 1.17. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IMV.L and MVEU.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

IMV.L vs. MVEU.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IMV.L drawdown since its inception was -24.48%, roughly equal to the maximum MVEU.L drawdown of -23.74%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IMV.L and MVEU.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IMV.LMVEU.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-24.48%

-23.74%

-0.74%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.50%

-8.32%

-0.18%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-8.50%

-8.32%

-0.18%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-17.42%

-17.42%

0.00%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-24.48%

-23.74%

-0.74%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.63%

-3.45%

-0.18%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.02%

-3.52%

-0.50%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.96%

2.82%

+0.14%

Volatility

IMV.L vs. MVEU.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares Edge MSCI Europe Min Volatility UCITS (IMV.L) is 1.63%, while iShares Edge MSCI Europe Minimum Volatility UCITS ETF EUR (Acc) (MVEU.L) has a volatility of 1.88%. This indicates that IMV.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MVEU.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IMV.LMVEU.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.63%

1.88%

-0.25%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.59%

7.31%

+0.28%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

9.09%

8.92%

+0.17%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

10.95%

11.28%

-0.33%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

12.28%

12.62%

-0.34%

IMV.L vs. MVEU.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both IMV.L and MVEU.L have an expense ratio of 0.25%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

IMV.L vs. MVEU.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither IMV.L nor MVEU.L has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.93, IMV.L and MVEU.L move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Both ETFs have the same 0.25% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

IMV.L and MVEU.L have the same expense ratio: 0.25% per year.

Both ETFs track MSCI Europe NR EUR.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IMV.L and MVEU.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer