PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IMV.L vs. IEFV.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

IMV.L vs. IEFV.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in iShares Edge MSCI Europe Min Volatility UCITS (IMV.L) and iShares Edge MSCI Europe Value Factor UCITS ETF (IEFV.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IMV.L achieves a 6.17% return, which is significantly lower than IEFV.L's 14.64% return. Over the past 10 years, IMV.L has underperformed IEFV.L with an annualized return of 8.01%, while IEFV.L has yielded a comparatively higher 12.59% annualized return.


IMV.L

1D
0.34%
1M
0.40%
YTD
6.17%
6M
6.33%
1Y
11.81%
3Y*
11.80%
5Y*
7.26%
10Y*
8.01%

IEFV.L

1D
1.36%
1M
1.12%
YTD
14.64%
6M
15.38%
1Y
38.77%
3Y*
22.78%
5Y*
15.04%
10Y*
12.59%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IMV.L vs. IEFV.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
IMV.L
iShares Edge MSCI Europe Min Volatility UCITS
6.17%17.66%6.63%8.56%-7.83%13.68%1.50%16.37%-2.91%13.29%
IEFV.L
iShares Edge MSCI Europe Value Factor UCITS ETF
14.64%42.20%5.40%11.41%1.47%18.58%-3.74%15.71%-12.67%14.28%

Correlation

The correlation between IMV.L and IEFV.L is 0.63, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.63

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.69

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.70

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.73

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 19, 2015

0.76

The correlation between IMV.L and IEFV.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.63 (1 year) to 0.76 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

IMV.L vs. IEFV.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
IMV.L
IEFV.L

Financial Services

17.9%
23.6%

Industrials

16.2%
18.8%

Consumer Defensive

13.8%
8.6%

Healthcare

12.6%
13.2%

Utilities

10.2%
4.8%

Communication Services

8.8%
3.6%

Energy

7.1%
5.2%

Basic Materials

5.2%
5.5%

Technology

3.5%
9.7%

Consumer Cyclical

3.4%
6.5%

Real Estate

1.6%
0.7%

Financial Services

IMV.L
17.9%
IEFV.L
23.6%

Industrials

IMV.L
16.2%
IEFV.L
18.8%

Consumer Defensive

IMV.L
13.8%
IEFV.L
8.6%

Healthcare

IMV.L
12.6%
IEFV.L
13.2%

Utilities

IMV.L
10.2%
IEFV.L
4.8%

Communication Services

IMV.L
8.8%
IEFV.L
3.6%

Energy

IMV.L
7.1%
IEFV.L
5.2%

Basic Materials

IMV.L
5.2%
IEFV.L
5.5%

Technology

IMV.L
3.5%
IEFV.L
9.7%

Consumer Cyclical

IMV.L
3.4%
IEFV.L
6.5%

Real Estate

IMV.L
1.6%
IEFV.L
0.7%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IMV.L vs. IEFV.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IMV.L
IMV.L Risk / Return Rank: 3636
Overall Rank
IMV.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4040
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IMV.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 3737
Sortino Ratio Rank
IMV.L Omega Ratio Rank: 4141
Omega Ratio Rank
IMV.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 3030
Calmar Ratio Rank
IMV.L Martin Ratio Rank: 3030
Martin Ratio Rank

IEFV.L
IEFV.L Risk / Return Rank: 8787
Overall Rank
IEFV.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9393
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IEFV.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 9292
Sortino Ratio Rank
IEFV.L Omega Ratio Rank: 9292
Omega Ratio Rank
IEFV.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 7979
Calmar Ratio Rank
IEFV.L Martin Ratio Rank: 7979
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IMV.L vs. IEFV.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Edge MSCI Europe Min Volatility UCITS (IMV.L) and iShares Edge MSCI Europe Value Factor UCITS ETF (IEFV.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


IMV.LIEFV.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.58

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.12

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.25

1.53

-0.28

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.38

3.65

-2.27

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

3.97

13.42

-9.45

IMV.L vs. IEFV.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IMV.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.30, which is lower than the IEFV.L Sharpe Ratio of 2.88. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IMV.L and IEFV.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

IMV.L vs. IEFV.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IMV.L drawdown since its inception was -24.48%, smaller than the maximum IEFV.L drawdown of -34.64%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IMV.L and IEFV.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IMV.LIEFV.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-24.48%

-34.64%

+10.16%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.50%

-10.57%

+2.07%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-8.50%

-15.02%

+6.52%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-17.42%

-16.16%

-1.26%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-24.48%

-34.64%

+10.16%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.30%

0.00%

-3.30%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.02%

-6.18%

+2.16%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.97%

2.88%

+0.09%

Volatility

IMV.L vs. IEFV.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares Edge MSCI Europe Min Volatility UCITS (IMV.L) is 1.66%, while iShares Edge MSCI Europe Value Factor UCITS ETF (IEFV.L) has a volatility of 3.84%. This indicates that IMV.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IEFV.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IMV.LIEFV.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.66%

3.84%

-2.18%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.58%

11.09%

-3.51%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

9.10%

13.43%

-4.33%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

10.95%

17.10%

-6.15%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

12.28%

17.58%

-5.30%

IMV.L vs. IEFV.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both IMV.L and IEFV.L have an expense ratio of 0.25%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

IMV.L vs. IEFV.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither IMV.L nor IEFV.L has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


IMV.L and IEFV.L have a correlation of 0.63, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Both ETFs have the same 0.25% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

IMV.L and IEFV.L have the same expense ratio: 0.25% per year.

IMV.L tracks MSCI Europe NR EUR, while IEFV.L tracks MSCI Europe Value NR EUR.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IMV.L and IEFV.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer