PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IMV.L vs. EUMV.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

IMV.L vs. EUMV.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in iShares Edge MSCI Europe Min Volatility UCITS (IMV.L) and Ossiam Europe ESG Machine Learning ETF UCITS (EUR) (EUMV.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

IMV.L is traded in GBp, while EUMV.L is traded in EUR. To make them comparable, the EUMV.L values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with IMV.L having a 4.72% return and EUMV.L slightly higher at 4.73%. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with IMV.L having a 7.68% annualized return and EUMV.L not far ahead at 7.81%.


IMV.L

1D
0.51%
1M
1.21%
YTD
4.72%
6M
5.90%
1Y
8.30%
3Y*
10.49%
5Y*
7.54%
10Y*
7.68%

EUMV.L

1D
0.73%
1M
-0.12%
YTD
4.73%
6M
5.99%
1Y
7.11%
3Y*
11.36%
5Y*
7.03%
10Y*
7.81%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IMV.L vs. EUMV.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
IMV.L
iShares Edge MSCI Europe Min Volatility UCITS
4.72%17.66%6.63%8.56%-7.83%13.68%1.50%16.37%-2.91%13.29%
EUMV.L
Ossiam Europe ESG Machine Learning ETF UCITS (EUR)
4.73%18.06%9.37%4.56%-9.49%15.84%6.52%11.60%-4.02%17.01%

Correlation

The correlation between IMV.L and EUMV.L is 0.79, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.79

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.84

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.86

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.86

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 30, 2013

0.85

The correlation between IMV.L and EUMV.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.79 to 0.86 - a consistent structural relationship.

IMV.L vs. EUMV.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
IMV.L
EUMV.L

Financial Services

17.9%
17.1%

Industrials

15.4%
18.7%

Consumer Defensive

13.1%
1.1%

Healthcare

13.0%
1.3%

Utilities

10.2%
20.2%

Communication Services

9.6%
16.5%

Energy

7.1%
2.2%

Basic Materials

5.6%
0.4%

Consumer Cyclical

3.6%
2.1%

Technology

2.8%
9.8%

Real Estate

1.6%
11.6%

Financial Services

IMV.L
17.9%
EUMV.L
17.1%

Industrials

IMV.L
15.4%
EUMV.L
18.7%

Consumer Defensive

IMV.L
13.1%
EUMV.L
1.1%

Healthcare

IMV.L
13.0%
EUMV.L
1.3%

Utilities

IMV.L
10.2%
EUMV.L
20.2%

Communication Services

IMV.L
9.6%
EUMV.L
16.5%

Energy

IMV.L
7.1%
EUMV.L
2.2%

Basic Materials

IMV.L
5.6%
EUMV.L
0.4%

Consumer Cyclical

IMV.L
3.6%
EUMV.L
2.1%

Technology

IMV.L
2.8%
EUMV.L
9.8%

Real Estate

IMV.L
1.6%
EUMV.L
11.6%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IMV.L vs. EUMV.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IMV.L
IMV.L Risk / Return Rank: 2424
Overall Rank
IMV.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2626
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IMV.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 2424
Sortino Ratio Rank
IMV.L Omega Ratio Rank: 2626
Omega Ratio Rank
IMV.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 2222
Calmar Ratio Rank
IMV.L Martin Ratio Rank: 2323
Martin Ratio Rank

EUMV.L
EUMV.L Risk / Return Rank: 1515
Overall Rank
EUMV.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1616
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EUMV.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 1515
Sortino Ratio Rank
EUMV.L Omega Ratio Rank: 1515
Omega Ratio Rank
EUMV.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 1616
Calmar Ratio Rank
EUMV.L Martin Ratio Rank: 1717
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IMV.L vs. EUMV.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Edge MSCI Europe Min Volatility UCITS (IMV.L) and Ossiam Europe ESG Machine Learning ETF UCITS (EUR) (EUMV.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


IMV.LEUMV.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.23

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.29

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.17

1.13

+0.04

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.97

0.78

+0.19

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.92

2.70

+0.22

IMV.L vs. EUMV.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IMV.L Sharpe Ratio is 0.91, which is higher than the EUMV.L Sharpe Ratio of 0.68. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IMV.L and EUMV.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


IMV.LEUMV.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.91

0.68

+0.23

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.69

0.58

+0.11

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.62

0.61

+0.01

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.71

0.63

+0.09

Drawdowns

IMV.L vs. EUMV.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IMV.L drawdown since its inception was -24.48%, roughly equal to the maximum EUMV.L drawdown of -24.37%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IMV.L and EUMV.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IMV.LEUMV.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-24.48%

-24.37%

-0.11%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.50%

-9.06%

+0.56%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-8.50%

-10.56%

+2.06%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-17.42%

-17.87%

+0.45%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-24.48%

-24.37%

-0.11%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-4.62%

-2.95%

-1.67%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.57%

-3.97%

+0.40%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.83%

2.62%

+0.21%

Volatility

IMV.L vs. EUMV.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares Edge MSCI Europe Min Volatility UCITS (IMV.L) is 2.89%, while Ossiam Europe ESG Machine Learning ETF UCITS (EUR) (EUMV.L) has a volatility of 3.21%. This indicates that IMV.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than EUMV.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IMV.LEUMV.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.89%

3.21%

-0.32%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.71%

8.80%

-1.09%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

9.13%

10.49%

-1.36%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

10.97%

12.19%

-1.22%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

12.31%

12.90%

-0.59%

IMV.L vs. EUMV.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

IMV.L has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is lower than EUMV.L's 0.45% expense ratio.


Dividends

IMV.L vs. EUMV.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither IMV.L nor EUMV.L has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


IMV.L and EUMV.L have a correlation of 0.79, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, IMV.L is cheaper at 0.25% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

IMV.L is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.45% for EUMV.L.

Both ETFs track MSCI Europe NR EUR. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Natixis. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for IMV.L and 0.45% for EUMV.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IMV.L and EUMV.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer