PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IMV.L vs. CSP1.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

IMV.L vs. CSP1.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in iShares Edge MSCI Europe Min Volatility UCITS (IMV.L) and iShares Core S&P 500 UCITS ETF (CSP1.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IMV.L achieves a 4.72% return, which is significantly lower than CSP1.L's 10.55% return. Over the past 10 years, IMV.L has underperformed CSP1.L with an annualized return of 7.68%, while CSP1.L has yielded a comparatively higher 16.07% annualized return.


IMV.L

1D
0.51%
1M
1.21%
YTD
4.72%
6M
5.90%
1Y
8.30%
3Y*
10.49%
5Y*
7.54%
10Y*
7.68%

CSP1.L

1D
0.05%
1M
5.54%
YTD
10.55%
6M
10.48%
1Y
29.13%
3Y*
19.02%
5Y*
14.94%
10Y*
16.07%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IMV.L vs. CSP1.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
IMV.L
iShares Edge MSCI Europe Min Volatility UCITS
4.72%17.66%6.63%8.56%-7.83%13.68%1.50%16.37%-2.91%13.29%
CSP1.L
iShares Core S&P 500 UCITS ETF
10.55%9.37%27.35%19.79%-9.05%31.07%13.65%26.42%0.01%10.83%

Correlation

The correlation between IMV.L and CSP1.L is 0.30, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.30

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.35

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.48

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.61

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 2, 2013

0.63

Over the past year, the correlation between IMV.L and CSP1.L has dropped to 0.30 - well below their long-term average of 0.63, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

IMV.L vs. CSP1.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
IMV.L
CSP1.L

Financial Services

17.9%
11.3%

Industrials

15.4%
7.9%

Consumer Defensive

13.1%
4.7%

Healthcare

13.0%
8.4%

Utilities

10.2%
2.2%

Communication Services

9.6%
10.7%

Energy

7.1%
3.4%

Basic Materials

5.6%
1.7%

Consumer Cyclical

3.6%
9.9%

Technology

2.8%
38.0%

Real Estate

1.6%
1.9%

Financial Services

IMV.L
17.9%
CSP1.L
11.3%

Industrials

IMV.L
15.4%
CSP1.L
7.9%

Consumer Defensive

IMV.L
13.1%
CSP1.L
4.7%

Healthcare

IMV.L
13.0%
CSP1.L
8.4%

Utilities

IMV.L
10.2%
CSP1.L
2.2%

Communication Services

IMV.L
9.6%
CSP1.L
10.7%

Energy

IMV.L
7.1%
CSP1.L
3.4%

Basic Materials

IMV.L
5.6%
CSP1.L
1.7%

Consumer Cyclical

IMV.L
3.6%
CSP1.L
9.9%

Technology

IMV.L
2.8%
CSP1.L
38.0%

Real Estate

IMV.L
1.6%
CSP1.L
1.9%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IMV.L vs. CSP1.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IMV.L
IMV.L Risk / Return Rank: 2424
Overall Rank
IMV.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2626
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IMV.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 2424
Sortino Ratio Rank
IMV.L Omega Ratio Rank: 2626
Omega Ratio Rank
IMV.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 2222
Calmar Ratio Rank
IMV.L Martin Ratio Rank: 2323
Martin Ratio Rank

CSP1.L
CSP1.L Risk / Return Rank: 8282
Overall Rank
CSP1.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8484
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CSP1.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 8383
Sortino Ratio Rank
CSP1.L Omega Ratio Rank: 8585
Omega Ratio Rank
CSP1.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 8080
Calmar Ratio Rank
CSP1.L Martin Ratio Rank: 7878
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IMV.L vs. CSP1.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Edge MSCI Europe Min Volatility UCITS (IMV.L) and iShares Core S&P 500 UCITS ETF (CSP1.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


IMV.LCSP1.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.82

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.38

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.17

1.51

-0.34

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.97

4.07

-3.10

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.92

14.99

-12.07

IMV.L vs. CSP1.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IMV.L Sharpe Ratio is 0.91, which is lower than the CSP1.L Sharpe Ratio of 2.73. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IMV.L and CSP1.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


IMV.LCSP1.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.91

2.73

-1.82

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.69

1.04

-0.36

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.62

1.03

-0.41

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.71

1.09

-0.38

Drawdowns

IMV.L vs. CSP1.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IMV.L drawdown since its inception was -24.48%, roughly equal to the maximum CSP1.L drawdown of -25.48%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IMV.L and CSP1.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IMV.LCSP1.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-24.48%

-25.48%

+1.00%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.50%

-7.12%

-1.38%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-8.50%

-20.77%

+12.27%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-17.42%

-20.77%

+3.35%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-24.48%

-25.48%

+1.00%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-4.62%

-0.24%

-4.38%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.57%

-3.32%

-0.25%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.83%

1.94%

+0.89%

Volatility

IMV.L vs. CSP1.L - Volatility Comparison

iShares Edge MSCI Europe Min Volatility UCITS (IMV.L) has a higher volatility of 2.89% compared to iShares Core S&P 500 UCITS ETF (CSP1.L) at 2.62%. This indicates that IMV.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CSP1.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IMV.LCSP1.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.89%

2.62%

+0.27%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.71%

7.16%

+0.55%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

9.13%

10.62%

-1.49%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

10.97%

14.31%

-3.34%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

12.31%

15.57%

-3.26%

IMV.L vs. CSP1.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

IMV.L has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is higher than CSP1.L's 0.07% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

IMV.L vs. CSP1.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither IMV.L nor CSP1.L has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


IMV.L and CSP1.L have a correlation of 0.30, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, CSP1.L is cheaper at 0.07% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

CSP1.L is cheaper with a 0.07% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for IMV.L.

IMV.L is categorized as Europe Equities, while CSP1.L is S&P 500. IMV.L tracks MSCI Europe NR EUR, while CSP1.L tracks S&P 500 Index. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for IMV.L and 0.07% for CSP1.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IMV.L and CSP1.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer