IMV.L vs. CSP1.L
IMV.L (iShares Edge MSCI Europe Min Volatility UCITS) and CSP1.L (iShares Core S&P 500 UCITS ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - IMV.L is a Europe Equities fund tracking the MSCI Europe NR EUR, while CSP1.L is a S&P 500 fund tracking the S&P 500 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, IMV.L returned 7.68%/yr vs 16.07%/yr for CSP1.L. A 0.63 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. IMV.L charges 0.25%/yr vs 0.07%/yr for CSP1.L.
Performance
IMV.L vs. CSP1.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IMV.L achieves a 4.72% return, which is significantly lower than CSP1.L's 10.55% return. Over the past 10 years, IMV.L has underperformed CSP1.L with an annualized return of 7.68%, while CSP1.L has yielded a comparatively higher 16.07% annualized return.
IMV.L
- 1D
- 0.51%
- 1M
- 1.21%
- YTD
- 4.72%
- 6M
- 5.90%
- 1Y
- 8.30%
- 3Y*
- 10.49%
- 5Y*
- 7.54%
- 10Y*
- 7.68%
CSP1.L
- 1D
- 0.05%
- 1M
- 5.54%
- YTD
- 10.55%
- 6M
- 10.48%
- 1Y
- 29.13%
- 3Y*
- 19.02%
- 5Y*
- 14.94%
- 10Y*
- 16.07%
IMV.L vs. CSP1.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IMV.L iShares Edge MSCI Europe Min Volatility UCITS | 4.72% | 17.66% | 6.63% | 8.56% | -7.83% | 13.68% | 1.50% | 16.37% | -2.91% | 13.29% |
CSP1.L iShares Core S&P 500 UCITS ETF | 10.55% | 9.37% | 27.35% | 19.79% | -9.05% | 31.07% | 13.65% | 26.42% | 0.01% | 10.83% |
Correlation
The correlation between IMV.L and CSP1.L is 0.30, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.30 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.35 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.48 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.61 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 2, 2013 | 0.63 |
Over the past year, the correlation between IMV.L and CSP1.L has dropped to 0.30 - well below their long-term average of 0.63, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
IMV.L vs. CSP1.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
IMV.L
CSP1.L
Financial Services
Industrials
Consumer Defensive
Healthcare
Utilities
Communication Services
Energy
Basic Materials
Consumer Cyclical
Technology
Real Estate
Financial Services
IMV.L
CSP1.L
Industrials
IMV.L
CSP1.L
Consumer Defensive
IMV.L
CSP1.L
Healthcare
IMV.L
CSP1.L
Utilities
IMV.L
CSP1.L
Communication Services
IMV.L
CSP1.L
Energy
IMV.L
CSP1.L
Basic Materials
IMV.L
CSP1.L
Consumer Cyclical
IMV.L
CSP1.L
Technology
IMV.L
CSP1.L
Real Estate
IMV.L
CSP1.L
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IMV.L vs. CSP1.L — Risk / Return Rank
IMV.L
CSP1.L
IMV.L vs. CSP1.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Edge MSCI Europe Min Volatility UCITS (IMV.L) and iShares Core S&P 500 UCITS ETF (CSP1.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| IMV.L | CSP1.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.82 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.38 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.17 | 1.51 | -0.34 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.97 | 4.07 | -3.10 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.92 | 14.99 | -12.07 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| IMV.L | CSP1.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.91 | 2.73 | -1.82 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.69 | 1.04 | -0.36 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.62 | 1.03 | -0.41 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.71 | 1.09 | -0.38 |
Drawdowns
IMV.L vs. CSP1.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IMV.L drawdown since its inception was -24.48%, roughly equal to the maximum CSP1.L drawdown of -25.48%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IMV.L and CSP1.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IMV.L | CSP1.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -24.48% | -25.48% | +1.00% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.50% | -7.12% | -1.38% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -8.50% | -20.77% | +12.27% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -17.42% | -20.77% | +3.35% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -24.48% | -25.48% | +1.00% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -4.62% | -0.24% | -4.38% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.57% | -3.32% | -0.25% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.83% | 1.94% | +0.89% |
Volatility
IMV.L vs. CSP1.L - Volatility Comparison
iShares Edge MSCI Europe Min Volatility UCITS (IMV.L) has a higher volatility of 2.89% compared to iShares Core S&P 500 UCITS ETF (CSP1.L) at 2.62%. This indicates that IMV.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CSP1.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IMV.L | CSP1.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.89% | 2.62% | +0.27% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.71% | 7.16% | +0.55% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 9.13% | 10.62% | -1.49% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 10.97% | 14.31% | -3.34% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 12.31% | 15.57% | -3.26% |
IMV.L vs. CSP1.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
IMV.L has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is higher than CSP1.L's 0.07% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
IMV.L vs. CSP1.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither IMV.L nor CSP1.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
IMV.L and CSP1.L have a correlation of 0.30, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, CSP1.L is cheaper at 0.07% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
CSP1.L is cheaper with a 0.07% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for IMV.L.
IMV.L is categorized as Europe Equities, while CSP1.L is S&P 500. IMV.L tracks MSCI Europe NR EUR, while CSP1.L tracks S&P 500 Index. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for IMV.L and 0.07% for CSP1.L.
Find the right allocation for IMV.L and CSP1.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer