IMSR vs. LINK-USD

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

IMSR (Terrestrial Energy Inc.) is a stock, while LINK-USD (ChainLink) is a cryptocurrency. At a 0.34 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.

Performance

IMSR vs. LINK-USD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Terrestrial Energy Inc. (IMSR) and ChainLink (LINK-USD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IMSR achieves a 43.54% return, which is significantly higher than LINK-USD's -32.49% return.

IMSR

• 1D: -8.65%
• 1M: 21.13%
• YTD: 43.54%
• 6M: -8.65%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

LINK-USD

• 1D: -1.64%
• 1M: -12.11%
• YTD: -32.49%
• 6M: -43.81%
• 1Y: -41.77%
• 3Y*: 8.44%
• 5Y*: -22.19%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IMSR vs. LINK-USD - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
IMSR Terrestrial Energy Inc.	43.54%	-66.13%
LINK-USD ChainLink	-32.49%	-31.64%

Correlation

The correlation between IMSR and LINK-USD is 0.34, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 29, 2025	0.34

Return for Risk

IMSR vs. LINK-USD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LINK-USD

LINK-USD Risk / Return Rank: 65
LINK-USD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 59
LINK-USD Sortino Ratio Rank: 61
LINK-USD Omega Ratio Rank: 60
LINK-USD Calmar Ratio Rank: 73
LINK-USD Martin Ratio Rank: 73

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IMSR vs. LINK-USD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Terrestrial Energy Inc. (IMSR) and ChainLink (LINK-USD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	IMSR	LINK-USD	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	—	-0.53	—
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	-0.24	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	-0.59	0.45	-1.04

Drawdowns

IMSR vs. LINK-USD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IMSR drawdown since its inception was -71.05%, smaller than the maximum LINK-USD drawdown of -90.19%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IMSR and LINK-USD.

Drawdown Indicators

	IMSR	LINK-USD	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-71.05%	-90.19%	+19.14%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-70.48%	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-72.98%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-85.26%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-54.08%	-84.29%	+30.21%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-55.46%	-60.36%	+4.90%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	50.46%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	IMSR	LINK-USD	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	14.65%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	44.37%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	119.56%	65.18%	+54.38%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	119.56%	75.69%	+43.87%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	119.56%	100.88%	+18.68%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both IMSR and LINK-USD in my portfolio?

IMSR and LINK-USD have a correlation of 0.34, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.