IMSIX vs. HFSAX
Compare and contrast key facts about IMS Strategic Income Fund (IMSIX) and Hundredfold Select Alternative Fund Investor Class (HFSAX).
IMSIX is managed by IMS. It was launched on Nov 4, 2002. HFSAX is managed by Advisors Preferred.
Performance
IMSIX vs. HFSAX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
IMSIX vs. HFSAX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IMSIX IMS Strategic Income Fund | -2.05% | 8.83% | 0.41% | 10.14% | -17.29% | 11.84% | 4.01% | 15.97% | -9.31% | -5.36% |
HFSAX Hundredfold Select Alternative Fund Investor Class | -0.92% | 11.97% | 3.75% | 10.93% | -9.44% | 9.05% | 38.71% | 10.35% | -1.97% | 9.91% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IMSIX achieves a -2.05% return, which is significantly lower than HFSAX's -0.92% return. Over the past 10 years, IMSIX has underperformed HFSAX with an annualized return of 1.68%, while HFSAX has yielded a comparatively higher 8.40% annualized return.
IMSIX
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- -3.49%
- YTD
- -2.05%
- 6M
- -2.03%
- 1Y
- 3.48%
- 3Y*
- 4.80%
- 5Y*
- -0.30%
- 10Y*
- 1.68%
HFSAX
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- -3.45%
- YTD
- -0.92%
- 6M
- 2.27%
- 1Y
- 10.24%
- 3Y*
- 8.42%
- 5Y*
- 3.95%
- 10Y*
- 8.40%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
IMSIX vs. HFSAX - Expense Ratio Comparison
IMSIX has a 1.95% expense ratio, which is higher than HFSAX's 1.75% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
IMSIX vs. HFSAX — Risk / Return Rank
IMSIX
HFSAX
IMSIX vs. HFSAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for IMS Strategic Income Fund (IMSIX) and Hundredfold Select Alternative Fund Investor Class (HFSAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| IMSIX | HFSAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.43 | 2.35 | -1.92 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 0.63 | 3.17 | -2.53 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.10 | 1.47 | -0.38 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.70 | 2.71 | -2.00 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.00 | 9.66 | -7.65 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| IMSIX | HFSAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.43 | 2.35 | -1.92 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.03 | 0.63 | -0.66 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.18 | 1.35 | -1.17 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.10 | 1.30 | -1.20 |
Correlation
The correlation between IMSIX and HFSAX is 0.46, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Dividends
IMSIX vs. HFSAX - Dividend Comparison
IMSIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.81%, less than HFSAX's 9.84% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IMSIX IMS Strategic Income Fund | 8.81% | 7.96% | 7.00% | 5.16% | 7.84% | 6.79% | 5.93% | 5.02% | 6.38% | 7.27% | 9.32% | 11.40% |
HFSAX Hundredfold Select Alternative Fund Investor Class | 9.84% | 9.75% | 5.87% | 5.17% | 4.92% | 10.98% | 13.58% | 6.44% | 3.11% | 11.06% | 5.60% | 1.85% |
Drawdowns
IMSIX vs. HFSAX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IMSIX drawdown since its inception was -51.80%, which is greater than HFSAX's maximum drawdown of -12.81%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IMSIX and HFSAX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| IMSIX | HFSAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -51.80% | -12.81% | -38.99% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -4.93% | -3.68% | -1.25% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -26.09% | -12.81% | -13.28% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -27.23% | -12.81% | -14.42% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -26.17% | -3.68% | -22.49% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -20.81% | -2.39% | -18.42% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.73% | 1.03% | +0.70% |
Volatility
IMSIX vs. HFSAX - Volatility Comparison
IMS Strategic Income Fund (IMSIX) has a higher volatility of 2.26% compared to Hundredfold Select Alternative Fund Investor Class (HFSAX) at 1.84%. This indicates that IMSIX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than HFSAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| IMSIX | HFSAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.26% | 1.84% | +0.42% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 4.51% | 3.69% | +0.82% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 6.93% | 4.41% | +2.52% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 8.78% | 6.31% | +2.47% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 9.22% | 6.25% | +2.97% |