IMSIX vs. GOIIX

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

IMSIX (IMS Strategic Income Fund) and GOIIX (Goldman Sachs Growth and Income Strategy Portfolio) are both Tactical Allocation funds. Over the past 10 years, IMSIX returned 1.26%/yr vs 8.99%/yr for GOIIX. A 0.62 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. IMSIX charges 1.95%/yr vs 0.19%/yr for GOIIX.

Performance

IMSIX vs. GOIIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in IMS Strategic Income Fund (IMSIX) and Goldman Sachs Growth and Income Strategy Portfolio (GOIIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IMSIX achieves a 2.03% return, which is significantly lower than GOIIX's 7.53% return. Over the past 10 years, IMSIX has underperformed GOIIX with an annualized return of 1.26%, while GOIIX has yielded a comparatively higher 8.99% annualized return.

IMSIX

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 1.54%
• YTD: 2.03%
• 6M: 2.03%
• 1Y: 7.75%
• 3Y*: 6.24%
• 5Y*: -0.06%
• 10Y*: 1.26%

GOIIX

• 1D: -0.11%
• 1M: 1.44%
• YTD: 7.53%
• 6M: 7.21%
• 1Y: 19.24%
• 3Y*: 15.07%
• 5Y*: 7.51%
• 10Y*: 8.99%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IMSIX vs. GOIIX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
IMSIX IMS Strategic Income Fund	2.03%	8.83%	0.41%	10.14%	-17.29%	11.84%	4.01%	15.97%	-9.31%	-5.36%
GOIIX Goldman Sachs Growth and Income Strategy Portfolio	7.53%	15.03%	14.81%	15.16%	-15.86%	12.65%	12.73%	19.16%	-8.63%	16.60%

Correlation

The correlation between IMSIX and GOIIX is 0.51, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.51
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.50
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.59
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.56
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 5, 2002	0.63

The correlation between IMSIX and GOIIX shifts across timeframes, from 0.50 (3 years) to 0.62 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

IMSIX vs. GOIIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IMSIX

IMSIX Risk / Return Rank: 27
IMSIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 25
IMSIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 24
IMSIX Omega Ratio Rank: 38
IMSIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 24
IMSIX Martin Ratio Rank: 23

GOIIX

GOIIX Risk / Return Rank: 65
GOIIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 67
GOIIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 65
GOIIX Omega Ratio Rank: 66
GOIIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 59
GOIIX Martin Ratio Rank: 67

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IMSIX vs. GOIIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for IMS Strategic Income Fund (IMSIX) and Goldman Sachs Growth and Income Strategy Portfolio (GOIIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	IMSIX	GOIIX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.33	2.20	-0.87
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.91	3.07	-1.16
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.30	1.41	-0.11
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.69	2.82	-1.13
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	5.29	12.25	-6.96

IMSIX vs. GOIIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IMSIX Sharpe Ratio is 1.33, which is lower than the GOIIX Sharpe Ratio of 2.20. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IMSIX and GOIIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

IMSIX vs. GOIIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IMSIX drawdown since its inception was -51.80%, which is greater than GOIIX's maximum drawdown of -43.63%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IMSIX and GOIIX.

Drawdown Indicators

	IMSIX	GOIIX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-51.80%	-43.63%	-8.17%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-4.93%	-7.17%	+2.24%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-9.64%	-12.19%	+2.55%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-25.83%	-23.78%	-2.05%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-27.23%	-25.07%	-2.16%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-23.09%	-0.23%	-22.86%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-20.84%	-6.40%	-14.44%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.57%	1.64%	-0.07%

Volatility

IMSIX vs. GOIIX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for IMS Strategic Income Fund (IMSIX) is 1.40%, while Goldman Sachs Growth and Income Strategy Portfolio (GOIIX) has a volatility of 3.55%. This indicates that IMSIX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GOIIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	IMSIX	GOIIX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	1.40%	3.55%	-2.15%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	4.43%	7.64%	-3.21%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	6.29%	9.21%	-2.92%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	8.82%	10.73%	-1.91%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	9.21%	11.30%	-2.09%

IMSIX vs. GOIIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

IMSIX has a 1.95% expense ratio, which is higher than GOIIX's 0.19% expense ratio.

Dividends

IMSIX vs. GOIIX - Dividend Comparison

IMSIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.12%, more than GOIIX's 7.98% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
GOIIX Goldman Sachs Growth and Income Strategy Portfolio	7.98%	7.98%	9.79%	1.97%	5.09%	6.80%	3.47%	2.29%	3.04%	2.73%	1.37%	3.99%
IMSIX IMS Strategic Income Fund	8.12%	7.96%	7.00%	5.16%	7.84%	6.79%	5.93%	5.02%	6.38%	7.27%	9.32%	11.40%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both IMSIX and GOIIX in my portfolio?

IMSIX and GOIIX have a correlation of 0.51, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, IMSIX or GOIIX?

GOIIX has higher volatility (3.55%) compared to IMSIX (1.40%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IMSIX dropped -51.80% vs GOIIX's -43.63%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

GOIIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.20 vs 1.33), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.