PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IMOS vs. NVDA
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

IMOS vs. NVDA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ChipMOS TECHNOLOGIES INC. (IMOS) and NVIDIA Corporation (NVDA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IMOS achieves a 62.07% return, which is significantly higher than NVDA's 7.77% return. Over the past 10 years, IMOS has underperformed NVDA with an annualized return of 16.10%, while NVDA has yielded a comparatively higher 64.62% annualized return.


IMOS

1D
0.74%
1M
-25.86%
6M
29.33%
YTD
62.07%
1Y
184.65%
3Y*
32.16%
5Y*
10.61%
10Y*
16.10%
ALL TIME*
5.39%

NVDA

1D
2.93%
1M
3.04%
6M
5.16%
YTD
7.77%
1Y
15.71%
3Y*
62.93%
5Y*
59.52%
10Y*
64.62%
ALL TIME*
36.28%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$6.65M$8.96M$7.58M
$25.46B$26.13B$31.85B

IMOS vs. NVDA - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
IMOS
ChipMOS TECHNOLOGIES INC.
62.07%64.28%-27.86%34.76%-32.61%49.82%12.33%38.76%-3.73%28.71%
NVDA
NVIDIA Corporation
7.77%38.92%171.25%239.02%-50.26%125.48%122.30%76.94%-30.82%81.99%

Correlation

The correlation between IMOS and NVDA is 0.23, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.23

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.29

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.38

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.33

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 19, 2001

0.28

The correlation between IMOS and NVDA shifts across timeframes, from 0.23 (1 year) to 0.38 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

IMOS:

$1.66B

NVDA:

$4.86T

EPS

IMOS:

NT$9.58

NVDA:

$6.53

PE Ratio

IMOS:

160.28

NVDA:

30.73

PS Ratio

IMOS:

2.88

NVDA:

19.35

PB Ratio

IMOS:

2.19

NVDA:

25.05

Total Revenue (TTM)

IMOS:

NT$18.75B

NVDA:

$253.49B

Gross Profit (TTM)

IMOS:

NT$2.12B

NVDA:

$187.95B

EBITDA (TTM)

IMOS:

-NT$130.72M

NVDA:

$192.76B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IMOS vs. NVDA — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

IMOS
IMOS Risk / Return Rank: 9393
Overall Rank
IMOS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9595
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IMOS Sortino Ratio Rank: 9292
Sortino Ratio Rank
IMOS Omega Ratio Rank: 9090
Omega Ratio Rank
IMOS Calmar Ratio Rank: 9494
Calmar Ratio Rank
IMOS Martin Ratio Rank: 9696
Martin Ratio Rank

NVDA
NVDA Risk / Return Rank: 5656
Overall Rank
NVDA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5858
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NVDA Sortino Ratio Rank: 5353
Sortino Ratio Rank
NVDA Omega Ratio Rank: 5151
Omega Ratio Rank
NVDA Calmar Ratio Rank: 6060
Calmar Ratio Rank
NVDA Martin Ratio Rank: 5959
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

IMOS vs. NVDA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ChipMOS TECHNOLOGIES INC. (IMOS) and NVIDIA Corporation (NVDA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


IMOSNVDADifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+2.08

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+2.26

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.36

1.09

+0.27

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.63

0.65

+3.99

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

15.21

1.32

+13.89

IMOS vs. NVDA - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IMOS Sharpe Ratio is 2.44, which is higher than the NVDA Sharpe Ratio of 0.36. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IMOS and NVDA, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

IMOS vs. NVDA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IMOS drawdown since its inception was -98.76%, which is greater than NVDA's maximum drawdown of -89.72%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IMOS and NVDA.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IMOSNVDADifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-98.76%

-89.72%

-9.04%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-39.78%

-20.21%

-19.57%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-55.46%

-36.88%

-18.58%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-62.26%

-66.34%

+4.08%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-62.26%

-66.34%

+4.08%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-37.45%

-14.74%

-22.71%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-60.21%

-36.07%

-24.14%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

12.10%

9.90%

+2.20%

Volatility

IMOS vs. NVDA - Volatility Comparison

ChipMOS TECHNOLOGIES INC. (IMOS) has a higher volatility of 30.57% compared to NVIDIA Corporation (NVDA) at 12.04%. This indicates that IMOS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than NVDA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IMOSNVDADifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

30.57%

12.04%

+18.53%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

62.73%

28.30%

+34.43%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

75.47%

36.41%

+39.06%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

45.46%

51.87%

-6.41%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

40.80%

49.95%

-9.15%

Dividends

IMOS vs. NVDA - Dividend Comparison

IMOS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.65%, more than NVDA's 0.14% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
IMOS
ChipMOS TECHNOLOGIES INC.
1.65%2.77%5.90%5.52%13.62%4.46%3.84%2.61%0.80%3.49%7.28%0.71%
NVDA
NVIDIA Corporation
0.14%0.02%0.03%0.03%0.11%0.05%0.12%0.27%0.46%0.29%0.45%1.20%

Financials

IMOS vs. NVDA - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between ChipMOS TECHNOLOGIES INC. and NVIDIA Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


Values in USD except per share items

IMOS vs. NVDA - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between ChipMOS TECHNOLOGIES INC. and NVIDIA Corporation over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

IMOS - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, ChipMOS TECHNOLOGIES INC. reported a gross profit of 30.20M and revenue of 219.23M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 13.8%.

NVDA - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, NVIDIA Corporation reported a gross profit of 61.16B and revenue of 81.62B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 74.9%.

IMOS - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, ChipMOS TECHNOLOGIES INC. reported an operating income of 15.92M and revenue of 219.23M, resulting in an operating margin of 7.3%.

NVDA - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, NVIDIA Corporation reported an operating income of 53.54B and revenue of 81.62B, resulting in an operating margin of 65.6%.

IMOS - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, ChipMOS TECHNOLOGIES INC. reported a net income of 15.96M and revenue of 219.23M, resulting in a net margin of 7.3%.

NVDA - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, NVIDIA Corporation reported a net income of 58.32B and revenue of 81.62B, resulting in a net margin of 71.5%.


Frequently Asked Questions


IMOS and NVDA have a correlation of 0.23, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

IMOS has higher volatility (30.57%) compared to NVDA (12.04%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IMOS dropped -98.76% vs NVDA's -89.72%.

IMOS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.44 vs 0.36), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IMOS and NVDA

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer