PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IMLPX vs. VLPIX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

IMLPX vs. VLPIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in MainGate MLP Fund (IMLPX) and Virtus Duff & Phelps Select MLP and Energy Fund (VLPIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with IMLPX having a 23.80% return and VLPIX slightly higher at 24.52%. Over the past 10 years, IMLPX has underperformed VLPIX with an annualized return of 9.83%, while VLPIX has yielded a comparatively higher 12.39% annualized return.


IMLPX

1D
0.25%
1M
3.28%
6M
15.71%
YTD
23.80%
1Y
24.31%
3Y*
21.80%
5Y*
23.56%
10Y*
9.83%
ALL TIME*
7.85%

VLPIX

1D
0.31%
1M
1.05%
6M
16.18%
YTD
24.52%
1Y
28.63%
3Y*
24.12%
5Y*
23.52%
10Y*
12.39%
ALL TIME*
10.76%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$0.00$0.00$0.00

IMLPX vs. VLPIX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
IMLPX
MainGate MLP Fund
23.80%2.77%34.76%20.26%33.69%44.24%-27.81%7.14%-22.20%-7.92%
VLPIX
Virtus Duff & Phelps Select MLP and Energy Fund
24.52%3.49%41.45%11.99%30.81%44.75%-18.60%9.59%-17.20%-1.13%

Correlation

The correlation between IMLPX and VLPIX is 0.92, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.92

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.92

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.94

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.95

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 11, 2015

0.95

The correlation between IMLPX and VLPIX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.92 to 0.95 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IMLPX vs. VLPIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

IMLPX
IMLPX Risk / Return Rank: 7373
Overall Rank
IMLPX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7373
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IMLPX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6969
Sortino Ratio Rank
IMLPX Omega Ratio Rank: 6464
Omega Ratio Rank
IMLPX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9292
Calmar Ratio Rank
IMLPX Martin Ratio Rank: 6565
Martin Ratio Rank

VLPIX
VLPIX Risk / Return Rank: 8585
Overall Rank
VLPIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8484
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VLPIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8181
Sortino Ratio Rank
VLPIX Omega Ratio Rank: 7777
Omega Ratio Rank
VLPIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9696
Calmar Ratio Rank
VLPIX Martin Ratio Rank: 8686
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

IMLPX vs. VLPIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for MainGate MLP Fund (IMLPX) and Virtus Duff & Phelps Select MLP and Energy Fund (VLPIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


IMLPXVLPIXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.31

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.46

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.29

1.35

-0.05

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.72

4.42

-0.70

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.46

11.13

-2.67

IMLPX vs. VLPIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IMLPX Sharpe Ratio is 1.73, which is comparable to the VLPIX Sharpe Ratio of 2.04. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IMLPX and VLPIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

IMLPX vs. VLPIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IMLPX drawdown since its inception was -76.39%, which is greater than VLPIX's maximum drawdown of -64.56%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IMLPX and VLPIX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IMLPXVLPIXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-76.39%

-64.56%

-11.83%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.47%

-6.65%

+0.18%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-15.93%

-17.54%

+1.61%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-22.00%

-21.26%

-0.74%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-72.19%

-64.56%

-7.63%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.53%

-3.51%

+0.98%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-17.54%

-10.54%

-7.00%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.84%

2.64%

+0.20%

Volatility

IMLPX vs. VLPIX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for MainGate MLP Fund (IMLPX) is 4.92%, while Virtus Duff & Phelps Select MLP and Energy Fund (VLPIX) has a volatility of 5.30%. This indicates that IMLPX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VLPIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IMLPXVLPIXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.92%

5.30%

-0.38%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.08%

11.56%

-0.48%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.87%

14.39%

-0.52%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.84%

20.00%

-0.16%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

26.44%

24.58%

+1.86%

IMLPX vs. VLPIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

IMLPX has a 1.44% expense ratio, which is higher than VLPIX's 1.17% expense ratio.


Dividends

IMLPX vs. VLPIX - Dividend Comparison

IMLPX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.53%, less than VLPIX's 7.87% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
IMLPX
MainGate MLP Fund
4.53%4.55%4.22%5.04%5.75%7.22%11.02%9.83%9.65%6.98%6.02%7.01%
VLPIX
Virtus Duff & Phelps Select MLP and Energy Fund
7.87%9.63%2.61%3.32%3.01%3.66%5.40%4.28%4.04%2.81%2.50%0.92%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.92, IMLPX and VLPIX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

VLPIX has higher volatility (5.30%) compared to IMLPX (4.92%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IMLPX dropped -76.39% vs VLPIX's -64.56%.

VLPIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.04 vs 1.73), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IMLPX and VLPIX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer