IMGP.L vs. IWVG.L
IMGP.L (iShares US Mortgage Backed Securities UCITS ETF GBP Hedged (Dist)) and IWVG.L (iShares Edge MSCI World Value Factor UCITS ETF USD (Dist)) are both Global Equities funds from iShares - IMGP.L tracks the iShares US Mortgage Backed Securities UCITS ETF GBP Hedged (Dist) while IWVG.L tracks the MSCI ACWI Value NR USD. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, IMGP.L returned 3.56%/yr vs 25.26%/yr for IWVG.L. At a 0.06 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
IMGP.L vs. IWVG.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IMGP.L achieves a 0.24% return, which is significantly lower than IWVG.L's 28.47% return.
IMGP.L
- 1D
- 0.20%
- 1M
- -0.35%
- 6M
- -0.35%
- YTD
- 0.24%
- 1Y
- 5.40%
- 3Y*
- 3.56%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
IWVG.L
- 1D
- -2.49%
- 1M
- -4.98%
- 6M
- 24.42%
- YTD
- 28.47%
- 1Y
- 54.93%
- 3Y*
- 25.26%
- 5Y*
- 16.93%
- 10Y*
- —
IMGP.L vs. IWVG.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IMGP.L iShares US Mortgage Backed Securities UCITS ETF GBP Hedged (Dist) | 0.24% | 8.06% | 0.85% | 2.81% | 2.83% |
IWVG.L iShares Edge MSCI World Value Factor UCITS ETF USD (Dist) | 28.47% | 31.27% | 6.58% | 13.08% | 3.44% |
Correlation
The correlation between IMGP.L and IWVG.L is 0.18, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.18 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.12 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 7, 2022 | 0.06 |
The correlation between IMGP.L and IWVG.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.06 (all time) to 0.18 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IMGP.L vs. IWVG.L — Risk / Return Rank
IMGP.L
IWVG.L
IMGP.L vs. IWVG.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares US Mortgage Backed Securities UCITS ETF GBP Hedged (Dist) (IMGP.L) and iShares Edge MSCI World Value Factor UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (IWVG.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| IMGP.L | IWVG.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.37 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.98 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.25 | 1.67 | -0.43 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.74 | 7.82 | -6.08 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.37 | 25.39 | -20.02 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
IMGP.L vs. IWVG.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IMGP.L drawdown since its inception was -9.76%, smaller than the maximum IWVG.L drawdown of -28.07%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IMGP.L and IWVG.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IMGP.L | IWVG.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -9.76% | -28.07% | +18.31% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -3.09% | -6.99% | +3.90% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -7.57% | -13.92% | +6.35% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -13.92% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.50% | -6.26% | +4.76% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.14% | -4.29% | +2.15% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.00% | 2.16% | -1.16% |
Volatility
IMGP.L vs. IWVG.L - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares US Mortgage Backed Securities UCITS ETF GBP Hedged (Dist) (IMGP.L) is 1.41%, while iShares Edge MSCI World Value Factor UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (IWVG.L) has a volatility of 6.15%. This indicates that IMGP.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IWVG.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IMGP.L | IWVG.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.41% | 6.15% | -4.74% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 3.28% | 13.11% | -9.83% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 4.19% | 14.94% | -10.75% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 6.91% | 13.44% | -6.53% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 6.91% | 15.68% | -8.77% |
Dividends
IMGP.L vs. IWVG.L - Dividend Comparison
IMGP.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.71%, more than IWVG.L's 1.93% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IMGP.L iShares US Mortgage Backed Securities UCITS ETF GBP Hedged (Dist) | 3.71% | 3.50% | 3.55% | 3.15% | 0.38% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
IWVG.L iShares Edge MSCI World Value Factor UCITS ETF USD (Dist) | 1.93% | 2.48% | 3.12% | 3.22% | 3.11% | 2.61% | 2.37% | 2.90% | 2.48% |
Frequently Asked Questions
IMGP.L and IWVG.L have a correlation of 0.18, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
IMGP.L tracks iShares US Mortgage Backed Securities UCITS ETF GBP Hedged (Dist), while IWVG.L tracks MSCI ACWI Value NR USD.
Find the right allocation for IMGP.L and IWVG.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer