PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IMEU.AS vs. IDJG.AS
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

IMEU.AS vs. IDJG.AS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in iShares Core MSCI Europe UCITS ETF EUR (Dist) (IMEU.AS) and iShares Euro Total Market Growth Large UCITS ETF (IDJG.AS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IMEU.AS achieves a 6.89% return, which is significantly lower than IDJG.AS's 10.66% return. Over the past 10 years, IMEU.AS has underperformed IDJG.AS with an annualized return of 9.15%, while IDJG.AS has yielded a comparatively higher 10.00% annualized return.


IMEU.AS

1D
-0.67%
1M
3.83%
YTD
6.89%
6M
9.70%
1Y
16.16%
3Y*
13.32%
5Y*
9.85%
10Y*
9.15%

IDJG.AS

1D
-0.43%
1M
9.28%
YTD
10.66%
6M
11.17%
1Y
14.97%
3Y*
10.84%
5Y*
8.63%
10Y*
10.00%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IMEU.AS vs. IDJG.AS - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
IMEU.AS
iShares Core MSCI Europe UCITS ETF EUR (Dist)
6.89%19.89%8.97%15.72%-9.15%25.73%-3.22%25.57%-9.62%10.04%
IDJG.AS
iShares Euro Total Market Growth Large UCITS ETF
10.66%10.86%10.46%20.59%-17.31%26.89%6.04%34.28%-10.77%12.45%

Correlation

The correlation between IMEU.AS and IDJG.AS is 0.89, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.89

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.87

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.87

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.88

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 6, 2007

0.79

The correlation between IMEU.AS and IDJG.AS has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.79 to 0.89 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IMEU.AS vs. IDJG.AS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IMEU.AS
IMEU.AS Risk / Return Rank: 3636
Overall Rank
IMEU.AS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3535
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IMEU.AS Sortino Ratio Rank: 3535
Sortino Ratio Rank
IMEU.AS Omega Ratio Rank: 3636
Omega Ratio Rank
IMEU.AS Calmar Ratio Rank: 3434
Calmar Ratio Rank
IMEU.AS Martin Ratio Rank: 4040
Martin Ratio Rank

IDJG.AS
IDJG.AS Risk / Return Rank: 2525
Overall Rank
IDJG.AS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2323
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IDJG.AS Sortino Ratio Rank: 2525
Sortino Ratio Rank
IDJG.AS Omega Ratio Rank: 2424
Omega Ratio Rank
IDJG.AS Calmar Ratio Rank: 2525
Calmar Ratio Rank
IDJG.AS Martin Ratio Rank: 2828
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IMEU.AS vs. IDJG.AS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Core MSCI Europe UCITS ETF EUR (Dist) (IMEU.AS) and iShares Euro Total Market Growth Large UCITS ETF (IDJG.AS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


IMEU.ASIDJG.ASDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.47

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.53

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.24

1.15

+0.08

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.68

1.16

+0.52

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.32

3.82

+2.50

IMEU.AS vs. IDJG.AS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IMEU.AS Sharpe Ratio is 1.26, which is higher than the IDJG.AS Sharpe Ratio of 0.79. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IMEU.AS and IDJG.AS, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


IMEU.ASIDJG.ASDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.26

0.79

+0.47

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.69

0.44

+0.25

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.58

0.53

+0.05

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.30

0.37

-0.07

Drawdowns

IMEU.AS vs. IDJG.AS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IMEU.AS drawdown since its inception was -57.85%, roughly equal to the maximum IDJG.AS drawdown of -56.97%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IMEU.AS and IDJG.AS.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IMEU.ASIDJG.ASDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-57.85%

-56.97%

-0.88%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.49%

-12.76%

+3.27%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-16.34%

-20.09%

+3.75%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-19.26%

-28.00%

+8.74%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-35.73%

-34.50%

-1.23%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.22%

-0.43%

-1.79%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-11.91%

-11.36%

-0.55%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.53%

3.88%

-1.35%

Volatility

IMEU.AS vs. IDJG.AS - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares Core MSCI Europe UCITS ETF EUR (Dist) (IMEU.AS) is 4.89%, while iShares Euro Total Market Growth Large UCITS ETF (IDJG.AS) has a volatility of 7.10%. This indicates that IMEU.AS experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IDJG.AS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IMEU.ASIDJG.ASDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.89%

7.10%

-2.21%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.53%

15.62%

-5.09%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.69%

18.67%

-5.98%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.05%

19.60%

-5.55%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.55%

18.79%

-3.24%

IMEU.AS vs. IDJG.AS - Expense Ratio Comparison

IMEU.AS has a 1.00% expense ratio, which is higher than IDJG.AS's 0.40% expense ratio.


Dividends

IMEU.AS vs. IDJG.AS - Dividend Comparison

IMEU.AS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.55%, more than IDJG.AS's 1.09% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
IDJG.AS
iShares Euro Total Market Growth Large UCITS ETF
1.09%1.04%0.97%0.94%1.00%0.55%0.99%1.39%1.55%1.57%1.80%1.72%
IMEU.AS
iShares Core MSCI Europe UCITS ETF EUR (Dist)
2.55%2.55%2.87%2.88%2.93%2.25%2.08%3.06%3.23%2.64%2.85%2.67%

Frequently Asked Questions


IMEU.AS and IDJG.AS have a correlation of 0.89, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, IDJG.AS is cheaper at 0.40% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

IDJG.AS is cheaper with a 0.40% expense ratio, compared with 1.00% for IMEU.AS.

IMEU.AS tracks MSCI Europe NR EUR, while IDJG.AS tracks MSCI EMU NR EUR. Their fees differ too: 1.00% for IMEU.AS and 0.40% for IDJG.AS.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IMEU.AS and IDJG.AS

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer