PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IMBS.L vs. SWDA.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

IMBS.L vs. SWDA.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares US Mortgage Backed Securities UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (IMBS.L) and iShares Core MSCI World UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (SWDA.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

IMBS.L is traded in USD, while SWDA.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the SWDA.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IMBS.L achieves a -0.33% return, which is significantly lower than SWDA.L's 10.59% return. Over the past 10 years, IMBS.L has underperformed SWDA.L with an annualized return of 1.01%, while SWDA.L has yielded a comparatively higher 13.08% annualized return.


IMBS.L

1D
-0.04%
1M
-0.33%
6M
-0.09%
YTD
-0.33%
1Y
5.49%
3Y*
4.05%
5Y*
0.06%
10Y*
1.01%

SWDA.L

1D
0.59%
1M
0.70%
6M
9.50%
YTD
10.59%
1Y
22.47%
3Y*
19.10%
5Y*
11.75%
10Y*
13.08%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IMBS.L vs. SWDA.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
IMBS.L
iShares US Mortgage Backed Securities UCITS ETF USD (Dist)
-0.33%8.60%1.54%3.57%-11.37%-1.69%4.04%6.52%-0.09%2.90%
SWDA.L
iShares Core MSCI World UCITS ETF USD (Acc)
10.59%21.14%19.09%23.79%-18.13%22.52%15.68%27.97%-9.23%22.42%

Correlation

The correlation between IMBS.L and SWDA.L is 0.23, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.23

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.20

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.17

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.09

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 23, 2016

0.09

The correlation between IMBS.L and SWDA.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.09 (all time) to 0.23 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IMBS.L vs. SWDA.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IMBS.L
IMBS.L Risk / Return Rank: 3131
Overall Rank
IMBS.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2828
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IMBS.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 2727
Sortino Ratio Rank
IMBS.L Omega Ratio Rank: 2525
Omega Ratio Rank
IMBS.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 3838
Calmar Ratio Rank
IMBS.L Martin Ratio Rank: 4040
Martin Ratio Rank

SWDA.L
SWDA.L Risk / Return Rank: 7979
Overall Rank
SWDA.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7878
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SWDA.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 7979
Sortino Ratio Rank
SWDA.L Omega Ratio Rank: 7979
Omega Ratio Rank
SWDA.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 7777
Calmar Ratio Rank
SWDA.L Martin Ratio Rank: 8181
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IMBS.L vs. SWDA.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares US Mortgage Backed Securities UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (IMBS.L) and iShares Core MSCI World UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (SWDA.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


IMBS.LSWDA.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.06

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.60

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.15

1.34

-0.19

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.60

2.60

-1.01

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.11

11.09

-5.98

IMBS.L vs. SWDA.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IMBS.L Sharpe Ratio is 0.85, which is lower than the SWDA.L Sharpe Ratio of 1.91. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IMBS.L and SWDA.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

IMBS.L vs. SWDA.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IMBS.L drawdown since its inception was -18.09%, smaller than the maximum SWDA.L drawdown of -45.69%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IMBS.L and SWDA.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IMBS.LSWDA.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-18.09%

-45.69%

+27.60%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.26%

-8.59%

+5.33%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-7.51%

-17.07%

+9.56%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-17.67%

-26.50%

+8.83%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-18.09%

-33.61%

+15.52%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.49%

0.00%

-1.49%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.22%

-11.15%

+6.93%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.02%

2.02%

-1.00%

Volatility

IMBS.L vs. SWDA.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares US Mortgage Backed Securities UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (IMBS.L) is 1.37%, while iShares Core MSCI World UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (SWDA.L) has a volatility of 2.88%. This indicates that IMBS.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SWDA.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IMBS.LSWDA.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.37%

2.88%

-1.51%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

4.22%

9.14%

-4.92%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

6.17%

11.74%

-5.57%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

7.77%

15.34%

-7.57%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

6.35%

15.69%

-9.34%

IMBS.L vs. SWDA.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

IMBS.L has a 0.28% expense ratio, which is higher than SWDA.L's 0.20% expense ratio.


Dividends

IMBS.L vs. SWDA.L - Dividend Comparison

IMBS.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.74%, while SWDA.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
IMBS.L
iShares US Mortgage Backed Securities UCITS ETF USD (Dist)
3.74%3.58%3.55%3.23%2.42%2.24%2.56%2.99%3.04%2.89%1.53%
SWDA.L
iShares Core MSCI World UCITS ETF USD (Acc)
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


IMBS.L and SWDA.L have a correlation of 0.23, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, SWDA.L is cheaper at 0.20% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

SWDA.L is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.28% for IMBS.L.

IMBS.L tracks iShares US Mortgage Backed Securities UCITS ETF USD (Dist), while SWDA.L tracks MSCI World Index. Their fees differ too: 0.28% for IMBS.L and 0.20% for SWDA.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IMBS.L and SWDA.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer