PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IMBS.L vs. HKOD.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

IMBS.L vs. HKOD.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares US Mortgage Backed Securities UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (IMBS.L) and HSBC MSCI KOREA CAPPED UCITS ETF (HKOD.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IMBS.L achieves a -0.33% return, which is significantly lower than HKOD.L's 70.37% return. Over the past 10 years, IMBS.L has underperformed HKOD.L with an annualized return of 1.01%, while HKOD.L has yielded a comparatively higher 14.34% annualized return.


IMBS.L

1D
-0.04%
1M
-0.33%
6M
-0.09%
YTD
-0.33%
1Y
5.49%
3Y*
4.05%
5Y*
0.06%
10Y*
1.01%

HKOD.L

1D
-1.67%
1M
-20.60%
6M
52.67%
YTD
70.37%
1Y
138.83%
3Y*
37.85%
5Y*
14.71%
10Y*
14.34%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IMBS.L vs. HKOD.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
IMBS.L
iShares US Mortgage Backed Securities UCITS ETF USD (Dist)
-0.33%8.60%1.54%3.57%-11.37%-1.69%4.04%6.52%-0.09%2.90%
HKOD.L
HSBC MSCI KOREA CAPPED UCITS ETF
70.37%99.54%-22.90%19.95%-28.44%-8.49%45.08%10.64%-21.06%45.79%

Correlation

The correlation between IMBS.L and HKOD.L is 0.18, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.18

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.13

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.16

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.11

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 23, 2016

0.11

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IMBS.L vs. HKOD.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IMBS.L
IMBS.L Risk / Return Rank: 3131
Overall Rank
IMBS.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2828
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IMBS.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 2727
Sortino Ratio Rank
IMBS.L Omega Ratio Rank: 2525
Omega Ratio Rank
IMBS.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 3838
Calmar Ratio Rank
IMBS.L Martin Ratio Rank: 4040
Martin Ratio Rank

HKOD.L
HKOD.L Risk / Return Rank: 9292
Overall Rank
HKOD.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9696
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HKOD.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 8787
Sortino Ratio Rank
HKOD.L Omega Ratio Rank: 9090
Omega Ratio Rank
HKOD.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 9494
Calmar Ratio Rank
HKOD.L Martin Ratio Rank: 9292
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IMBS.L vs. HKOD.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares US Mortgage Backed Securities UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (IMBS.L) and HSBC MSCI KOREA CAPPED UCITS ETF (HKOD.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


IMBS.LHKOD.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-2.23

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.98

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.15

1.45

-0.31

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.60

5.77

-4.18

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.11

17.93

-12.82

IMBS.L vs. HKOD.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IMBS.L Sharpe Ratio is 0.85, which is lower than the HKOD.L Sharpe Ratio of 3.07. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IMBS.L and HKOD.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

IMBS.L vs. HKOD.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IMBS.L drawdown since its inception was -18.09%, smaller than the maximum HKOD.L drawdown of -50.54%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IMBS.L and HKOD.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IMBS.LHKOD.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-18.09%

-50.54%

+32.45%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.26%

-24.00%

+20.74%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-7.51%

-29.48%

+21.97%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-17.67%

-47.65%

+29.98%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-18.09%

-50.54%

+32.45%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.49%

-24.00%

+22.51%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.22%

-18.79%

+14.57%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.02%

7.75%

-6.73%

Volatility

IMBS.L vs. HKOD.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares US Mortgage Backed Securities UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (IMBS.L) is 1.37%, while HSBC MSCI KOREA CAPPED UCITS ETF (HKOD.L) has a volatility of 20.20%. This indicates that IMBS.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than HKOD.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IMBS.LHKOD.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.37%

20.20%

-18.83%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

4.22%

41.23%

-37.01%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

6.17%

45.10%

-38.93%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

7.77%

29.74%

-21.97%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

6.35%

26.96%

-20.61%

IMBS.L vs. HKOD.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

IMBS.L has a 0.28% expense ratio, which is lower than HKOD.L's 0.50% expense ratio.


Dividends

IMBS.L vs. HKOD.L - Dividend Comparison

IMBS.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.74%, more than HKOD.L's 0.43% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
HKOD.L
HSBC MSCI KOREA CAPPED UCITS ETF
0.43%0.68%1.54%1.08%0.72%0.61%0.02%0.29%0.56%0.10%0.00%
IMBS.L
iShares US Mortgage Backed Securities UCITS ETF USD (Dist)
3.74%3.58%3.55%3.23%2.42%2.24%2.56%2.99%3.04%2.89%1.53%

Frequently Asked Questions


IMBS.L and HKOD.L have a correlation of 0.18, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, IMBS.L is cheaper at 0.28% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

IMBS.L is cheaper with a 0.28% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for HKOD.L.

IMBS.L tracks iShares US Mortgage Backed Securities UCITS ETF USD (Dist), while HKOD.L tracks HSBC MSCI KOREA CAPPED UCITS ETF. They also come from different issuers: iShares and HSBC. Their fees differ too: 0.28% for IMBS.L and 0.50% for HKOD.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IMBS.L and HKOD.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer