IMBA.L vs. TRIS.L
IMBA.L (iShares US Mortgage Backed Securities UCITS ETF (Acc)) and TRIS.L (Invesco US Treasury Bond 0-1 Year UCITS ETF Dist) are both exchange-traded funds - IMBA.L is a Mortgage Backed Securities fund tracking the Bloomberg US Mortgage Backed Securities Index, while TRIS.L is a Government Bonds fund tracking the Bloomberg US Treasury Coupons Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, IMBA.L returned 0.11%/yr vs 3.27%/yr for TRIS.L. At a correlation of -0.03, they often move in opposite directions. IMBA.L charges 0.28%/yr vs 0.06%/yr for TRIS.L.
Performance
IMBA.L vs. TRIS.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
IMBA.L is traded in USD, while TRIS.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the TRIS.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IMBA.L achieves a 0.11% return, which is significantly lower than TRIS.L's 1.35% return.
IMBA.L
- 1D
- 0.04%
- 1M
- -0.39%
- YTD
- 0.11%
- 6M
- 0.92%
- 1Y
- 5.94%
- 3Y*
- 4.11%
- 5Y*
- 0.11%
- 10Y*
- —
TRIS.L
- 1D
- 0.10%
- 1M
- 0.46%
- YTD
- 1.35%
- 6M
- 1.89%
- 1Y
- 3.90%
- 3Y*
- 4.64%
- 5Y*
- 3.27%
- 10Y*
- —
IMBA.L vs. TRIS.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IMBA.L iShares US Mortgage Backed Securities UCITS ETF (Acc) | 0.11% | 8.36% | 1.51% | 3.65% | -11.44% | -1.51% | 3.17% |
TRIS.L Invesco US Treasury Bond 0-1 Year UCITS ETF Dist | 1.36% | 4.55% | 5.06% | 4.48% | 0.53% | 0.33% | 0.82% |
Correlation
The correlation between IMBA.L and TRIS.L is -0.02, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.02 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | -0.05 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.03 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 27, 2020 | -0.03 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IMBA.L vs. TRIS.L — Risk / Return Rank
IMBA.L
TRIS.L
IMBA.L vs. TRIS.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares US Mortgage Backed Securities UCITS ETF (Acc) (IMBA.L) and Invesco US Treasury Bond 0-1 Year UCITS ETF Dist (TRIS.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| IMBA.L | TRIS.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.31 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.44 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.22 | 1.16 | +0.06 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.85 | 4.43 | -2.58 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.41 | 13.13 | -6.72 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| IMBA.L | TRIS.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.22 | 0.91 | +0.31 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.02 | 0.68 | -0.66 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.20 | 0.55 | -0.34 |
Drawdowns
IMBA.L vs. TRIS.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IMBA.L drawdown since its inception was -18.05%, which is greater than TRIS.L's maximum drawdown of -2.50%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IMBA.L and TRIS.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IMBA.L | TRIS.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -18.05% | -2.50% | -15.55% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -3.24% | -0.88% | -2.36% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -7.48% | -1.07% | -6.41% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -17.67% | -2.43% | -15.24% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.60% | -0.16% | -1.44% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.49% | -0.53% | -3.96% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.94% | 0.30% | +0.64% |
Volatility
IMBA.L vs. TRIS.L - Volatility Comparison
iShares US Mortgage Backed Securities UCITS ETF (Acc) (IMBA.L) has a higher volatility of 1.82% compared to Invesco US Treasury Bond 0-1 Year UCITS ETF Dist (TRIS.L) at 1.59%. This indicates that IMBA.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than TRIS.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IMBA.L | TRIS.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.82% | 1.59% | +0.23% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 3.72% | 3.54% | +0.18% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 4.91% | 4.27% | +0.64% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 7.18% | 4.80% | +2.38% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 5.75% | 4.93% | +0.82% |
IMBA.L vs. TRIS.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
IMBA.L has a 0.28% expense ratio, which is higher than TRIS.L's 0.06% expense ratio.
Dividends
IMBA.L vs. TRIS.L - Dividend Comparison
IMBA.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while TRIS.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.01%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IMBA.L iShares US Mortgage Backed Securities UCITS ETF (Acc) | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
TRIS.L Invesco US Treasury Bond 0-1 Year UCITS ETF Dist | 4.01% | 4.26% | 4.87% | 4.68% | 1.52% | 0.10% | 0.57% |
Frequently Asked Questions
IMBA.L and TRIS.L have a correlation of -0.02, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, TRIS.L is cheaper at 0.06% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
TRIS.L is cheaper with a 0.06% expense ratio, compared with 0.28% for IMBA.L.
IMBA.L is categorized as Mortgage Backed Securities, while TRIS.L is Government Bonds. IMBA.L tracks Bloomberg US Mortgage Backed Securities Index, while TRIS.L tracks Bloomberg US Treasury Coupons Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.28% for IMBA.L and 0.06% for TRIS.L.
Find the right allocation for IMBA.L and TRIS.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer