PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IMAY vs. BUFF
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

IMAY vs. BUFF - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Innovator International Developed Power Buffer ETF - May (IMAY) and Innovator Laddered Allocation Power Buffer ETF (BUFF). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IMAY achieves a 7.49% return, which is significantly higher than BUFF's 6.26% return.


IMAY

1D
-0.26%
1M
1.04%
6M
5.66%
YTD
7.49%
1Y
15.05%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
12.12%

BUFF

1D
0.26%
1M
0.67%
6M
5.31%
YTD
6.26%
1Y
12.03%
3Y*
11.19%
5Y*
8.65%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
8.63%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$6.70M$5.20M$4.32M
$76.23K$267.72K$793.38K

IMAY vs. BUFF - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between IMAY and BUFF is 0.73, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.73

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 1, 2024

0.65

The correlation between IMAY and BUFF has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.65 to 0.73 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IMAY vs. BUFF — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

IMAY
IMAY Risk / Return Rank: 8787
Overall Rank
IMAY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8383
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IMAY Sortino Ratio Rank: 8585
Sortino Ratio Rank
IMAY Omega Ratio Rank: 8787
Omega Ratio Rank
IMAY Calmar Ratio Rank: 8888
Calmar Ratio Rank
IMAY Martin Ratio Rank: 9191
Martin Ratio Rank

BUFF
BUFF Risk / Return Rank: 8989
Overall Rank
BUFF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8888
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BUFF Sortino Ratio Rank: 9090
Sortino Ratio Rank
BUFF Omega Ratio Rank: 9090
Omega Ratio Rank
BUFF Calmar Ratio Rank: 8484
Calmar Ratio Rank
BUFF Martin Ratio Rank: 9292
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

IMAY vs. BUFF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Innovator International Developed Power Buffer ETF - May (IMAY) and Innovator Laddered Allocation Power Buffer ETF (BUFF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


IMAYBUFFDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.18

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.36

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.39

1.42

-0.03

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.57

3.15

+0.42

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

14.98

16.12

-1.14

IMAY vs. BUFF - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IMAY Sharpe Ratio is 1.95, which is comparable to the BUFF Sharpe Ratio of 2.13. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IMAY and BUFF, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

IMAY vs. BUFF - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IMAY drawdown since its inception was -9.38%, smaller than the maximum BUFF drawdown of -46.23%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IMAY and BUFF.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IMAYBUFFDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-9.38%

-46.23%

+36.85%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-4.22%

-3.58%

-0.64%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-10.24%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-10.24%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.26%

-0.15%

-0.11%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.65%

-6.09%

+4.44%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.00%

0.70%

+0.30%

Volatility

IMAY vs. BUFF - Volatility Comparison

Innovator International Developed Power Buffer ETF - May (IMAY) has a higher volatility of 2.48% compared to Innovator Laddered Allocation Power Buffer ETF (BUFF) at 1.47%. This indicates that IMAY's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BUFF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IMAYBUFFDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.48%

1.47%

+1.01%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

6.64%

4.22%

+2.42%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

7.75%

5.31%

+2.44%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

9.46%

8.45%

+1.01%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

9.46%

17.54%

-8.08%

IMAY vs. BUFF - Expense Ratio Comparison

IMAY has a 0.85% expense ratio, which is lower than BUFF's 0.89% expense ratio.


Dividends

IMAY vs. BUFF - Dividend Comparison

Neither IMAY nor BUFF has paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
BUFF
Innovator Laddered Allocation Power Buffer ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%1.78%1.26%1.74%1.55%0.18%
IMAY
Innovator International Developed Power Buffer ETF - May
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


IMAY and BUFF have a correlation of 0.73, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

IMAY has higher volatility (2.48%) compared to BUFF (1.47%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IMAY dropped -9.38% vs BUFF's -46.23%.

On 1-year performance, IMAY leads with 15.05% vs 12.03% for BUFF. On fees, IMAY is cheaper at 0.85% per year. On volatility, BUFF has been the lower-risk option at 1.47%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, IMAY has performed better with a 15.05% return vs 12.03%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

IMAY is cheaper with a 0.85% expense ratio, compared with 0.89% for BUFF.

IMAY and BUFF have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

Their fees differ too: 0.85% for IMAY and 0.89% for BUFF.

BUFF currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.13 vs 1.95), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IMAY and BUFF

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer