PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IMAX vs. NFLX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

IMAX vs. NFLX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Imax Corp (IMAX) and Netflix, Inc. (NFLX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IMAX achieves a 5.47% return, which is significantly higher than NFLX's -13.05% return. Over the past 10 years, IMAX has underperformed NFLX with an annualized return of 1.73%, while NFLX has yielded a comparatively higher 23.40% annualized return.


IMAX

1D
-3.75%
1M
10.61%
YTD
5.47%
6M
16.67%
1Y
39.56%
3Y*
29.26%
5Y*
12.71%
10Y*
1.73%

NFLX

1D
-2.17%
1M
-10.44%
YTD
-13.05%
6M
-21.59%
1Y
-33.07%
3Y*
26.74%
5Y*
10.50%
10Y*
23.40%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IMAX vs. NFLX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
IMAX
Imax Corp
5.47%44.37%70.44%2.46%-17.83%-1.00%-11.80%8.61%-18.75%-26.27%
NFLX
Netflix, Inc.
-13.05%5.19%83.07%65.11%-51.05%11.41%67.11%20.89%39.44%55.06%

Correlation

The correlation between IMAX and NFLX is 0.09, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.09

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.14

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.26

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.21

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 24, 2002

0.21

The correlation between IMAX and NFLX shifts across timeframes, from 0.09 (1 year) to 0.26 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

IMAX:

$2.20B

NFLX:

$350.41B

EPS

IMAX:

$0.78

NFLX:

$3.09

PE Ratio

IMAX:

49.93

NFLX:

26.37

PEG Ratio

IMAX:

1.82

NFLX:

1.04

PS Ratio

IMAX:

5.37

NFLX:

7.52

PB Ratio

IMAX:

6.55

NFLX:

11.26

Total Revenue (TTM)

IMAX:

$404.42M

NFLX:

$46.89B

Gross Profit (TTM)

IMAX:

$236.29M

NFLX:

$22.99B

EBITDA (TTM)

IMAX:

$97.20M

NFLX:

$26.91B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IMAX vs. NFLX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IMAX
IMAX Risk / Return Rank: 7171
Overall Rank
IMAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7171
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IMAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7171
Sortino Ratio Rank
IMAX Omega Ratio Rank: 6868
Omega Ratio Rank
IMAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7272
Calmar Ratio Rank
IMAX Martin Ratio Rank: 7373
Martin Ratio Rank

NFLX
NFLX Risk / Return Rank: 88
Overall Rank
NFLX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 44
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NFLX Sortino Ratio Rank: 66
Sortino Ratio Rank
NFLX Omega Ratio Rank: 77
Omega Ratio Rank
NFLX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1212
Calmar Ratio Rank
NFLX Martin Ratio Rank: 99
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IMAX vs. NFLX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Imax Corp (IMAX) and Netflix, Inc. (NFLX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


IMAXNFLXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.02

-1.00

+2.02

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.80

-1.40

+3.20

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.22

0.82

+0.40

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.75

-0.77

+2.51

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

4.48

-1.36

+5.84

IMAX vs. NFLX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IMAX Sharpe Ratio is 1.02, which is higher than the NFLX Sharpe Ratio of -1.00. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IMAX and NFLX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


IMAXNFLXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.02

-1.00

+2.02

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.32

0.24

+0.07

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.04

0.57

-0.53

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.10

0.57

-0.47

Drawdowns

IMAX vs. NFLX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IMAX drawdown since its inception was -98.20%, which is greater than NFLX's maximum drawdown of -81.99%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IMAX and NFLX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IMAXNFLXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-98.20%

-81.99%

-16.21%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-22.74%

-43.35%

+20.61%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-31.99%

-43.35%

+11.36%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-47.52%

-75.95%

+28.43%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-79.43%

-75.95%

-3.48%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-9.81%

-39.12%

+29.31%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-48.85%

-24.89%

-23.96%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

8.86%

24.34%

-15.48%

Volatility

IMAX vs. NFLX - Volatility Comparison

Imax Corp (IMAX) has a higher volatility of 18.13% compared to Netflix, Inc. (NFLX) at 7.24%. This indicates that IMAX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than NFLX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IMAXNFLXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

18.13%

7.24%

+10.89%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

32.89%

25.66%

+7.23%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

38.96%

33.14%

+5.82%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

40.15%

43.11%

-2.96%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

46.28%

41.52%

+4.76%

Dividends

IMAX vs. NFLX - Dividend Comparison

Neither IMAX nor NFLX has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Financials

IMAX vs. NFLX - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Imax Corp and Netflix, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.002.00B4.00B6.00B8.00B10.00B12.00B20222023202420252026
81.38M
12.25B
(IMAX) Total Revenue
(NFLX) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

IMAX vs. NFLX - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Imax Corp and Netflix, Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

30.0%35.0%40.0%45.0%50.0%55.0%60.0%65.0%20222023202420252026
56.3%
51.9%
Portfolio components
IMAX - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Imax Corp reported a gross profit of 45.81M and revenue of 81.38M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 56.3%.

NFLX - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Netflix, Inc. reported a gross profit of 6.36B and revenue of 12.25B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 51.9%.

IMAX - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Imax Corp reported an operating income of 9.95M and revenue of 81.38M, resulting in an operating margin of 12.2%.

NFLX - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Netflix, Inc. reported an operating income of 3.96B and revenue of 12.25B, resulting in an operating margin of 32.3%.

IMAX - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Imax Corp reported a net income of 10.91M and revenue of 81.38M, resulting in a net margin of 13.4%.

NFLX - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Netflix, Inc. reported a net income of 5.28B and revenue of 12.25B, resulting in a net margin of 43.1%.


Frequently Asked Questions


IMAX and NFLX have a correlation of 0.09, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

IMAX has higher volatility (18.13%) compared to NFLX (7.24%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IMAX dropped -98.20% vs NFLX's -81.99%.

IMAX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.02 vs -1.00), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IMAX and NFLX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer