IMAR vs. LOUP

Last updated Aug 2, 2026

IMAR (Innovator International Developed Power Buffer ETF - March) and LOUP (Innovator Deepwater Frontier Tech ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - IMAR is a Options Trading fund actively managed by Innovator, while LOUP is a Technology Equities fund tracking the Deepwater Frontier Tech Index. IMAR is actively managed, while LOUP is passively managed. Over the past year, IMAR returned 10.28% vs 37.12% for LOUP. Their 0.54 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. IMAR charges 0.85%/yr vs 0.70%/yr for LOUP.

Performance

IMAR vs. LOUP - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Innovator International Developed Power Buffer ETF - March (IMAR) and Innovator Deepwater Frontier Tech ETF (LOUP). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IMAR achieves a 3.05% return, which is significantly lower than LOUP's 11.39% return.

IMAR

• 1D: -0.36%
• 1M: 0.67%
• 6M: 1.84%
• YTD: 3.05%
• 1Y: 10.28%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 8.51%

LOUP

• 1D: -1.29%
• 1M: -11.40%
• 6M: 9.89%
• YTD: 11.39%
• 1Y: 37.12%
• 3Y*: 27.47%
• 5Y*: 10.70%
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 16.49%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
IMAR Innovator International Developed Power Buffer ETF - March	$556.22K	$433.12K	$4.08M
LOUP Innovator Deepwater Frontier Tech ETF	$926.73K	$920.97K	$1.38M

IMAR vs. LOUP - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
IMAR Innovator International Developed Power Buffer ETF - March	3.05%	18.88%	-0.57%
LOUP Innovator Deepwater Frontier Tech ETF	11.39%	43.24%	12.92%

Correlation

The correlation between IMAR and LOUP is 0.56, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.56
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 1, 2024	0.54

The correlation between IMAR and LOUP has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.54 to 0.56 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

IMAR vs. LOUP — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

IMAR

IMAR Risk / Return Rank: 49
IMAR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 49
IMAR Sortino Ratio Rank: 49
IMAR Omega Ratio Rank: 58
IMAR Calmar Ratio Rank: 42
IMAR Martin Ratio Rank: 49

LOUP

LOUP Risk / Return Rank: 42
LOUP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 42
LOUP Sortino Ratio Rank: 41
LOUP Omega Ratio Rank: 38
LOUP Calmar Ratio Rank: 44
LOUP Martin Ratio Rank: 42

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

IMAR vs. LOUP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Innovator International Developed Power Buffer ETF - March (IMAR) and Innovator Deepwater Frontier Tech ETF (LOUP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	IMAR	LOUP	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.22	1.05	+0.17
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.77	1.54	+0.23
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.25	1.18	+0.07
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.48	1.55	-0.07
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	5.74	4.59	+1.14

IMAR vs. LOUP - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IMAR Sharpe Ratio is 1.22, which is comparable to the LOUP Sharpe Ratio of 1.05. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IMAR and LOUP, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

IMAR vs. LOUP - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IMAR drawdown since its inception was -9.05%, smaller than the maximum LOUP drawdown of -58.68%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IMAR and LOUP.

Drawdown Indicators

	IMAR	LOUP	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-9.05%	-58.68%	+49.63%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-6.91%	-21.00%	+14.09%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-35.23%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-55.63%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.36%	-14.75%	+14.39%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-1.81%	-19.79%	+17.98%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.79%	7.09%	-5.30%

Volatility

IMAR vs. LOUP - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Innovator International Developed Power Buffer ETF - March (IMAR) is 2.52%, while Innovator Deepwater Frontier Tech ETF (LOUP) has a volatility of 9.47%. This indicates that IMAR experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than LOUP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	IMAR	LOUP	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.52%	9.47%	-6.95%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	7.72%	25.04%	-17.32%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	8.47%	31.22%	-22.75%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	9.33%	32.84%	-23.51%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	9.33%	32.07%	-22.74%

IMAR vs. LOUP - Expense Ratio Comparison

IMAR has a 0.85% expense ratio, which is higher than LOUP's 0.70% expense ratio.

Dividends

IMAR vs. LOUP - Dividend Comparison

Neither IMAR nor LOUP has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both IMAR and LOUP in my portfolio?

IMAR and LOUP have a correlation of 0.56, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, IMAR or LOUP?

LOUP has higher volatility (9.47%) compared to IMAR (2.52%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IMAR dropped -9.05% vs LOUP's -58.68%.

Which ETF is better, IMAR or LOUP?

On 1-year performance, LOUP leads with 37.12% vs 10.28% for IMAR. On fees, LOUP is cheaper at 0.70% per year. On volatility, IMAR has been the lower-risk option at 2.52%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, IMAR or LOUP?

Over the 1-year period, LOUP has performed better with a 37.12% return vs 10.28%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, IMAR or LOUP?

LOUP is cheaper with a 0.70% expense ratio, compared with 0.85% for IMAR.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, IMAR or LOUP?

IMAR and LOUP have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

What is the main difference between IMAR and LOUP?

IMAR is categorized as Options Trading, while LOUP is Technology Equities. Their fees differ too: 0.85% for IMAR and 0.70% for LOUP.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

IMAR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.22 vs 1.05), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.