PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo

Documentation

Upgrade your plan
ILMBX vs. HOBEX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

ILMBX vs. HOBEX

Last updated Jun 23, 2026

ILMBX (Voya Limited Maturity Bond Portfolio) and HOBEX (Holbrook Income Fund) are both Short-Term Bond funds. Over the past 5 years, ILMBX returned 1.49%/yr vs 3.76%/yr for HOBEX. At a 0.31 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. ILMBX charges 0.53%/yr vs 1.60%/yr for HOBEX.

Performance

ILMBX vs. HOBEX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Voya Limited Maturity Bond Portfolio (ILMBX) and Holbrook Income Fund (HOBEX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ILMBX achieves a 0.45% return, which is significantly lower than HOBEX's 1.91% return.

ILMBX

1D
0.10%
1M
0.24%
YTD
0.45%
6M
0.82%
1Y
2.88%
3Y*
4.16%
5Y*
1.49%
10Y*
1.69%

HOBEX

1D
-0.10%
1M
0.34%
YTD
1.91%
6M
2.93%
1Y
5.65%
3Y*
6.54%
5Y*
3.76%
10Y*
—
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ILMBX vs. HOBEX - Yearly Performance Comparison

2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
ILMBX
Voya Limited Maturity Bond Portfolio		0.45%4.30%4.48%4.20%-5.30%-0.48%3.20%4.06%1.06%1.20%
HOBEX
Holbrook Income Fund		1.91%7.23%7.16%4.74%-3.42%6.25%6.83%7.30%1.26%2.42%

Correlation

The correlation between ILMBX and HOBEX is 0.41, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.41

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.38

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.42

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 3, 2017

0.31

The correlation between ILMBX and HOBEX shifts across timeframes, from 0.31 (all time) to 0.42 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

Voya Limited Maturity Bond Portfolio

Holbrook Income Fund

Often compared with ILMBX:
ILMBX vs. IRLNXILMBX vs. VYMSXILMBX vs. IPHYXILMBX vs. IIRLXILMBX vs. ATLAXILMBX vs. DHEIXILMBX vs. SWSBX
Often compared with HOBEX:
HOBEX vs. PONPXHOBEX vs. PEYHOBEX vs. FDFIXHOBEX vs. HOBIXHOBEX vs. BINCHOBEX vs. PULSHOBEX vs. PQIPX

Return for Risk

ILMBX vs. HOBEX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.
ILMBX
ILMBX Risk / Return Rank: 3838
Overall Rank
ILMBX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2626
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ILMBX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3131
Sortino Ratio Rank
ILMBX Omega Ratio Rank: 4444
Omega Ratio Rank
ILMBX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4343
Calmar Ratio Rank
ILMBX Martin Ratio Rank: 4747
Martin Ratio Rank
HOBEX
HOBEX Risk / Return Rank: 9797
Overall Rank
HOBEX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9090
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HOBEX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9898
Sortino Ratio Rank
HOBEX Omega Ratio Rank: 9898
Omega Ratio Rank
HOBEX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9999
Calmar Ratio Rank
HOBEX Martin Ratio Rank: 9898
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ILMBX vs. HOBEX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Voya Limited Maturity Bond Portfolio (ILMBX) and Holbrook Income Fund (HOBEX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

ILMBXHOBEXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility
1.35
2.74

-1.39

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk
2.18
7.16

-4.99

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.33

2.43

-1.10

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.37

9.35

-6.98

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.23

33.19

-23.95

ILMBX vs. HOBEX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ILMBX Sharpe Ratio is 1.35, which is lower than the HOBEX Sharpe Ratio of 2.74. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ILMBX and HOBEX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Loading charts...

Drawdowns

ILMBX vs. HOBEX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ILMBX drawdown since its inception was -10.01%, smaller than the maximum HOBEX drawdown of -23.58%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ILMBX and HOBEX.

Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators

ILMBXHOBEXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-10.01%

-23.58%

+13.57%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-1.34%

-0.61%

-0.73%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-1.34%

-2.74%

+1.40%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-7.36%

-4.57%

-2.79%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-7.36%

—

—

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.32%

-0.20%

-0.12%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.16%

-1.06%

-0.10%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.33%

0.17%

+0.16%

Volatility

ILMBX vs. HOBEX - Volatility Comparison

Voya Limited Maturity Bond Portfolio (ILMBX) has a higher volatility of 0.71% compared to Holbrook Income Fund (HOBEX) at 0.49%. This indicates that ILMBX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than HOBEX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Loading charts...

Volatility by Period

ILMBXHOBEXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.71%

0.49%

+0.22%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

1.91%

1.54%

+0.37%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.36%

2.07%

+0.29%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

2.39%

2.61%

-0.22%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

1.98%

5.71%

-3.73%

ILMBX vs. HOBEX - Expense Ratio Comparison

ILMBX has a 0.53% expense ratio, which is lower than HOBEX's 1.60% expense ratio.

Dividends

ILMBX vs. HOBEX - Dividend Comparison

ILMBX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.49%, less than HOBEX's 5.81% yield.

PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
HOBEX
Holbrook Income Fund		5.81%5.94%6.58%5.05%4.83%4.00%5.44%3.05%3.84%1.69%0.00%0.00%
ILMBX
Voya Limited Maturity Bond Portfolio		3.49%3.15%4.26%3.45%1.30%1.09%1.96%1.59%1.45%1.70%2.40%0.95%

Frequently Asked Questions

ILMBX and HOBEX have a correlation of 0.41, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

ILMBX has higher volatility (0.71%) compared to HOBEX (0.49%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ILMBX dropped -10.01% vs HOBEX's -23.58%.

HOBEX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.74 vs 1.35), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ILMBX and HOBEX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer