ILGCX vs. CMTFX
Compare and contrast key facts about Columbia Integrated Large Cap Growth Fund Class A (ILGCX) and Columbia Global Technology Growth Fund (CMTFX).
ILGCX is an actively managed fund by Columbia. It was launched on May 27, 2014. CMTFX is managed by Columbia. It was launched on Nov 8, 2000.
Performance
ILGCX vs. CMTFX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
ILGCX vs. CMTFX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ILGCX Columbia Integrated Large Cap Growth Fund Class A | -8.30% | 14.93% | 31.88% | 41.54% | -20.15% |
CMTFX Columbia Global Technology Growth Fund | -10.17% | 25.10% | 31.72% | 56.85% | -29.20% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ILGCX achieves a -8.30% return, which is significantly higher than CMTFX's -10.17% return.
ILGCX
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- -2.85%
- YTD
- -8.30%
- 6M
- -6.63%
- 1Y
- 17.46%
- 3Y*
- 22.32%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
CMTFX
- 1D
- -1.69%
- 1M
- -9.74%
- YTD
- -10.17%
- 6M
- -8.43%
- 1Y
- 28.08%
- 3Y*
- 24.15%
- 5Y*
- 12.80%
- 10Y*
- 20.54%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
ILGCX vs. CMTFX - Expense Ratio Comparison
ILGCX has a 0.79% expense ratio, which is lower than CMTFX's 0.92% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
ILGCX vs. CMTFX — Risk / Return Rank
ILGCX
CMTFX
ILGCX vs. CMTFX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Columbia Integrated Large Cap Growth Fund Class A (ILGCX) and Columbia Global Technology Growth Fund (CMTFX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| ILGCX | CMTFX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.65 | 1.03 | -0.39 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.08 | 1.58 | -0.50 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.15 | 1.22 | -0.07 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.94 | 1.70 | -0.76 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.37 | 6.04 | -2.67 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| ILGCX | CMTFX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.65 | 1.03 | -0.39 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.50 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.84 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.54 | 0.44 | +0.11 |
Correlation
The correlation between ILGCX and CMTFX is 0.95, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
ILGCX vs. CMTFX - Dividend Comparison
ILGCX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 151.73%, more than CMTFX's 3.44% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ILGCX Columbia Integrated Large Cap Growth Fund Class A | 151.73% | 38.35% | 13.20% | 0.02% | 33.99% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
CMTFX Columbia Global Technology Growth Fund | 3.44% | 3.09% | 1.02% | 2.23% | 3.36% | 4.19% | 0.87% | 2.44% | 5.89% | 3.60% | 0.35% | 1.74% |
Drawdowns
ILGCX vs. CMTFX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ILGCX drawdown since its inception was -25.89%, smaller than the maximum CMTFX drawdown of -68.28%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ILGCX and CMTFX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| ILGCX | CMTFX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -25.89% | -68.28% | +42.39% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.13% | -14.35% | +2.22% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -39.42% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -39.42% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -10.69% | -14.35% | +3.66% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.94% | -16.40% | +9.46% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.32% | 4.04% | +0.28% |
Volatility
ILGCX vs. CMTFX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Columbia Integrated Large Cap Growth Fund Class A (ILGCX) is 4.06%, while Columbia Global Technology Growth Fund (CMTFX) has a volatility of 7.45%. This indicates that ILGCX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CMTFX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| ILGCX | CMTFX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.06% | 7.45% | -3.39% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.36% | 16.24% | -4.88% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 22.12% | 27.01% | -4.89% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 21.58% | 25.81% | -4.23% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.58% | 24.66% | -3.08% |