PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ILGCX vs. BPTRX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

ILGCX vs. BPTRX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Columbia Integrated Large Cap Growth Fund Class A (ILGCX) and Baron Partners Fund (BPTRX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


ILGCX

1D
1M
YTD
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

BPTRX

1D
-1.21%
1M
4.90%
YTD
-0.19%
6M
19.80%
1Y
31.83%
3Y*
22.85%
5Y*
13.31%
10Y*
24.08%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ILGCX vs. BPTRX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
ILGCX
Columbia Integrated Large Cap Growth Fund Class A
-8.30%14.93%31.88%41.54%-20.15%
BPTRX
Baron Partners Fund
-0.19%24.54%32.75%43.09%-35.45%

Correlation

The correlation between ILGCX and BPTRX is 0.46, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.46

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.61

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 10, 2022

0.71

Over the past year, the correlation between ILGCX and BPTRX has dropped to 0.46 - well below their long-term average of 0.71, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ILGCX vs. BPTRX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ILGCX

BPTRX
BPTRX Risk / Return Rank: 3535
Overall Rank
BPTRX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1717
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BPTRX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3434
Sortino Ratio Rank
BPTRX Omega Ratio Rank: 3030
Omega Ratio Rank
BPTRX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6262
Calmar Ratio Rank
BPTRX Martin Ratio Rank: 3232
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ILGCX vs. BPTRX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Columbia Integrated Large Cap Growth Fund Class A (ILGCX) and Baron Partners Fund (BPTRX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

ILGCX vs. BPTRX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


ILGCXBPTRXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.18

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.40

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.74

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.55

Drawdowns

ILGCX vs. BPTRX - Drawdown Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ILGCXBPTRXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-64.11%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.71%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-33.34%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-49.87%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-51.26%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.63%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-13.78%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.41%

Volatility

ILGCX vs. BPTRX - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ILGCXBPTRXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.43%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

21.24%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

27.58%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

33.62%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

32.70%

ILGCX vs. BPTRX - Expense Ratio Comparison

ILGCX has a 0.79% expense ratio, which is lower than BPTRX's 1.36% expense ratio.


Dividends

ILGCX vs. BPTRX - Dividend Comparison

ILGCX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 151.73%, more than BPTRX's 3.37% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BPTRX
Baron Partners Fund
3.37%3.36%0.76%0.00%3.19%7.72%3.67%0.26%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.35%
ILGCX
Columbia Integrated Large Cap Growth Fund Class A
151.73%38.35%13.20%0.02%33.99%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


ILGCX and BPTRX have a correlation of 0.46, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ILGCX and BPTRX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer