ILC.AX vs. IKO.AX
ILC.AX (iShares S&P/ASX 20 ETF) and IKO.AX (iShares MSCI South Korea ETF (AU)) are both Global Equities funds from iShares - ILC.AX tracks the iShares S&P/ASX 20 Index while IKO.AX tracks the iShares MSCI South Korea Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, ILC.AX returned 9.58%/yr vs 14.97%/yr for IKO.AX. At a 0.36 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
ILC.AX vs. IKO.AX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ILC.AX achieves a 9.65% return, which is significantly lower than IKO.AX's 64.31% return. Over the past 10 years, ILC.AX has underperformed IKO.AX with an annualized return of 9.58%, while IKO.AX has yielded a comparatively higher 14.97% annualized return.
ILC.AX
- 1D
- 0.12%
- 1M
- 1.00%
- 6M
- 9.35%
- YTD
- 9.65%
- 1Y
- 10.72%
- 3Y*
- 12.47%
- 5Y*
- 8.97%
- 10Y*
- 9.58%
IKO.AX
- 1D
- -7.36%
- 1M
- -17.70%
- 6M
- 49.12%
- YTD
- 64.31%
- 1Y
- 119.84%
- 3Y*
- 37.01%
- 5Y*
- 16.67%
- 10Y*
- 14.97%
ILC.AX vs. IKO.AX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ILC.AX iShares S&P/ASX 20 ETF | 9.65% | 7.10% | 11.42% | 12.56% | 3.62% | 15.87% | 0.87% | 20.21% | -0.14% | 6.77% |
IKO.AX iShares MSCI South Korea ETF (AU) | 64.31% | 80.87% | -12.63% | 16.96% | -20.13% | -2.25% | 29.64% | 7.29% | -11.42% | 30.24% |
Correlation
The correlation between ILC.AX and IKO.AX is 0.38, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.38 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.35 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.39 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.37 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 7, 2010 | 0.36 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ILC.AX vs. IKO.AX — Risk / Return Rank
ILC.AX
IKO.AX
ILC.AX vs. IKO.AX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares S&P/ASX 20 ETF (ILC.AX) and iShares MSCI South Korea ETF (AU) (IKO.AX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| ILC.AX | IKO.AX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.71 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.55 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.15 | 1.40 | -0.25 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.60 | 5.18 | -3.58 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.57 | 15.73 | -12.16 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
ILC.AX vs. IKO.AX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ILC.AX drawdown since its inception was -31.95%, smaller than the maximum IKO.AX drawdown of -57.74%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ILC.AX and IKO.AX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ILC.AX | IKO.AX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -31.95% | -57.74% | +25.79% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.57% | -22.15% | +14.58% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -13.62% | -22.15% | +8.53% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -14.27% | -39.03% | +24.76% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -31.95% | -39.50% | +7.55% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.27% | -22.11% | +20.84% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.43% | -17.29% | +11.86% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.44% | 7.43% | -3.99% |
Volatility
ILC.AX vs. IKO.AX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares S&P/ASX 20 ETF (ILC.AX) is 3.06%, while iShares MSCI South Korea ETF (AU) (IKO.AX) has a volatility of 21.99%. This indicates that ILC.AX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IKO.AX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ILC.AX | IKO.AX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.06% | 21.99% | -18.93% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.86% | 42.47% | -31.61% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.06% | 45.53% | -30.47% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 13.78% | 27.00% | -13.22% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 15.10% | 23.38% | -8.28% |
Dividends
ILC.AX vs. IKO.AX - Dividend Comparison
ILC.AX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.73%, less than IKO.AX's 5.85% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IKO.AX iShares MSCI South Korea ETF (AU) | 5.85% | 0.93% | 3.03% | 1.08% | 1.86% | 0.87% | 1.84% | 1.44% | 0.00% | 0.75% | 1.85% | 1.07% |
ILC.AX iShares S&P/ASX 20 ETF | 3.73% | 4.04% | 4.49% | 4.01% | 6.95% | 3.91% | 1.96% | 5.38% | 4.99% | 4.99% | 4.55% | 5.50% |
Frequently Asked Questions
ILC.AX and IKO.AX have a correlation of 0.38, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
ILC.AX tracks iShares S&P/ASX 20 Index, while IKO.AX tracks iShares MSCI South Korea Index.
Find the right allocation for ILC.AX and IKO.AX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer