ILBAX vs. FSMOX
ILBAX (Voya U.S. Bond Index Portfolio) and FSMOX (Fidelity SAI Investment Grade Securitized Fund) are both Intermediate Core Bond funds. Over the past 3 years, ILBAX returned 3.13%/yr vs 4.20%/yr for FSMOX. Their correlation of 0.91 suggests significant overlap in exposure. ILBAX charges 0.36%/yr vs 0.33%/yr for FSMOX.
Performance
ILBAX vs. FSMOX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ILBAX achieves a 0.29% return, which is significantly lower than FSMOX's 0.98% return.
ILBAX
- 1D
- 0.11%
- 1M
- 0.56%
- YTD
- 0.29%
- 6M
- 0.19%
- 1Y
- 4.24%
- 3Y*
- 3.13%
- 5Y*
- -0.60%
- 10Y*
- 1.00%
FSMOX
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.49%
- YTD
- 0.98%
- 6M
- 1.11%
- 1Y
- 7.15%
- 3Y*
- 4.20%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
ILBAX vs. FSMOX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
ILBAX Voya U.S. Bond Index Portfolio | 0.29% | 5.62% | 0.82% | 2.25% |
FSMOX Fidelity SAI Investment Grade Securitized Fund | 0.98% | 8.52% | 1.45% | 1.16% |
Correlation
The correlation between ILBAX and FSMOX is 0.83, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.83 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.90 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 18, 2023 | 0.91 |
The correlation between ILBAX and FSMOX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.83 to 0.91 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ILBAX vs. FSMOX — Risk / Return Rank
ILBAX
FSMOX
ILBAX vs. FSMOX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Voya U.S. Bond Index Portfolio (ILBAX) and Fidelity SAI Investment Grade Securitized Fund (FSMOX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| ILBAX | FSMOX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.66 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.05 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.20 | 1.33 | -0.13 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.51 | 2.54 | -1.03 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.25 | 8.25 | -4.00 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| ILBAX | FSMOX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.12 | 1.79 | -0.66 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.10 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.20 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.54 | 0.64 | -0.10 |
Drawdowns
ILBAX vs. FSMOX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ILBAX drawdown since its inception was -19.84%, which is greater than FSMOX's maximum drawdown of -8.65%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ILBAX and FSMOX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ILBAX | FSMOX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -19.84% | -8.65% | -11.19% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -3.14% | -2.84% | -0.30% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -6.59% | -8.47% | +1.88% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -18.79% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -19.84% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -6.35% | -1.16% | -5.19% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.72% | -1.76% | -1.96% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.16% | 0.87% | +0.29% |
Volatility
ILBAX vs. FSMOX - Volatility Comparison
Voya U.S. Bond Index Portfolio (ILBAX) and Fidelity SAI Investment Grade Securitized Fund (FSMOX) have volatilities of 1.54% and 1.48%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ILBAX | FSMOX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.54% | 1.48% | +0.06% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.88% | 2.87% | +0.01% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 4.22% | 4.04% | +0.18% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 6.15% | 6.21% | -0.06% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 5.01% | 6.21% | -1.20% |
ILBAX vs. FSMOX - Expense Ratio Comparison
ILBAX has a 0.36% expense ratio, which is higher than FSMOX's 0.33% expense ratio.
Dividends
ILBAX vs. FSMOX - Dividend Comparison
ILBAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.29%, less than FSMOX's 4.46% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FSMOX Fidelity SAI Investment Grade Securitized Fund | 4.46% | 4.44% | 5.07% | 1.21% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
ILBAX Voya U.S. Bond Index Portfolio | 3.29% | 2.90% | 4.06% | 3.15% | 1.81% | 2.90% | 3.20% | 2.39% | 2.36% | 2.39% | 2.27% | 2.53% |
Frequently Asked Questions
ILBAX and FSMOX have a correlation of 0.83, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
ILBAX has higher volatility (1.54%) compared to FSMOX (1.48%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ILBAX dropped -19.84% vs FSMOX's -8.65%.
FSMOX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.79 vs 1.12), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for ILBAX and FSMOX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer