PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo

Documentation

Upgrade your plan
ILB.AX vs. WRLD.AX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

ILB.AX vs. WRLD.AX

Last updated Jul 16, 2026
Documentation

ILB.AX (iShares Government Inflation ETF) and WRLD.AX (Betashares Managed Risk Global Shares Complex ETF) are both Global Equities funds. ILB.AX is passively managed, while WRLD.AX is actively managed. Over the past 10 years, ILB.AX returned 1.99%/yr vs 10.04%/yr for WRLD.AX. At a 0.02 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.

Performance

ILB.AX vs. WRLD.AX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a A$10,000 investment in iShares Government Inflation ETF (ILB.AX) and Betashares Managed Risk Global Shares Complex ETF (WRLD.AX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ILB.AX achieves a 1.76% return, which is significantly lower than WRLD.AX's 4.57% return. Over the past 10 years, ILB.AX has underperformed WRLD.AX with an annualized return of 1.99%, while WRLD.AX has yielded a comparatively higher 10.04% annualized return.

ILB.AX

1D
-0.06%
1M
-0.45%
6M
1.64%
YTD
1.76%
1Y
3.25%
3Y*
2.59%
5Y*
0.08%
10Y*
1.99%

WRLD.AX

1D
-0.04%
1M
2.32%
6M
3.52%
YTD
4.57%
1Y
13.29%
3Y*
16.18%
5Y*
10.33%
10Y*
10.04%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ILB.AX vs. WRLD.AX - Yearly Performance Comparison

2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
ILB.AX
iShares Government Inflation ETF		1.76%2.96%-0.96%8.89%-10.83%1.13%6.23%9.07%3.00%2.70%
WRLD.AX
Betashares Managed Risk Global Shares Complex ETF		4.57%9.59%29.10%13.20%-10.32%23.66%-3.31%22.48%-0.50%10.96%

Correlation

The correlation between ILB.AX and WRLD.AX is 0.02, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.02

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

-0.02

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.06

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.02

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 16, 2015

0.02

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

iShares Government Inflation ETF

Betashares Managed Risk Global Shares Complex ETF

Return for Risk

ILB.AX vs. WRLD.AX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.
ILB.AX
ILB.AX Risk / Return Rank: 1919
Overall Rank
ILB.AX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2121
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ILB.AX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1919
Sortino Ratio Rank
ILB.AX Omega Ratio Rank: 1818
Omega Ratio Rank
ILB.AX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1919
Calmar Ratio Rank
ILB.AX Martin Ratio Rank: 1818
Martin Ratio Rank
WRLD.AX
WRLD.AX Risk / Return Rank: 4444
Overall Rank
WRLD.AX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5252
Sharpe Ratio Rank
WRLD.AX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5151
Sortino Ratio Rank
WRLD.AX Omega Ratio Rank: 5050
Omega Ratio Rank
WRLD.AX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3333
Calmar Ratio Rank
WRLD.AX Martin Ratio Rank: 3333
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ILB.AX vs. WRLD.AX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Government Inflation ETF (ILB.AX) and Betashares Managed Risk Global Shares Complex ETF (WRLD.AX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

ILB.AXWRLD.AXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility
0.59
1.46

-0.87

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk
0.88
2.08

-1.20

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.10

1.26

-0.16

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.68

1.41

-0.72

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1.57

4.01

-2.45

ILB.AX vs. WRLD.AX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ILB.AX Sharpe Ratio is 0.59, which is lower than the WRLD.AX Sharpe Ratio of 1.46. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ILB.AX and WRLD.AX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Loading charts...

Drawdowns

ILB.AX vs. WRLD.AX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ILB.AX drawdown since its inception was -17.45%, which is greater than WRLD.AX's maximum drawdown of -16.14%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ILB.AX and WRLD.AX.

Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators

ILB.AXWRLD.AXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-17.45%

-16.14%

-1.31%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-4.40%

-9.22%

+4.82%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-4.40%

-13.70%

+9.30%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-17.45%

-14.47%

-2.98%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-17.45%

-16.14%

-1.31%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.93%

-0.50%

-0.43%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.59%

-4.19%

+0.60%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.95%

3.26%

-1.31%

Volatility

ILB.AX vs. WRLD.AX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares Government Inflation ETF (ILB.AX) is 0.81%, while Betashares Managed Risk Global Shares Complex ETF (WRLD.AX) has a volatility of 1.76%. This indicates that ILB.AX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than WRLD.AX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Loading charts...

Volatility by Period

ILB.AXWRLD.AXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.81%

1.76%

-0.95%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

3.51%

6.83%

-3.32%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

5.05%

8.86%

-3.81%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

7.38%

11.35%

-3.97%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

7.33%

11.00%

-3.67%

Dividends

ILB.AX vs. WRLD.AX - Dividend Comparison

ILB.AX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.64%, while WRLD.AX has not paid dividends to shareholders.

PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ILB.AX
iShares Government Inflation ETF		1.64%1.56%1.65%1.56%0.85%0.53%0.83%1.40%0.74%0.70%1.22%1.63%
WRLD.AX
Betashares Managed Risk Global Shares Complex ETF		0.00%0.00%0.00%0.17%4.66%0.00%0.00%1.66%0.90%0.00%0.51%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

ILB.AX and WRLD.AX have a correlation of 0.02, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

They also come from different issuers: iShares and BetaShares.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ILB.AX and WRLD.AX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer