ILB.AX vs. GNDQ.AX
ILB.AX (iShares Government Inflation ETF) and GNDQ.AX (Betashares Wealth Builder Nasdaq 100 Geared (30-40% LVR) Complex ETF) are both Global Equities funds. ILB.AX is passively managed, while GNDQ.AX is actively managed. Over the past year, ILB.AX returned 2.86% vs 21.89% for GNDQ.AX. At a 0.05 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
ILB.AX vs. GNDQ.AX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ILB.AX achieves a 1.74% return, which is significantly lower than GNDQ.AX's 9.74% return.
ILB.AX
- 1D
- -0.02%
- 1M
- -0.46%
- 6M
- 1.79%
- YTD
- 1.74%
- 1Y
- 2.86%
- 3Y*
- 2.56%
- 5Y*
- 0.07%
- 10Y*
- 1.95%
GNDQ.AX
- 1D
- -4.30%
- 1M
- -6.38%
- 6M
- 9.42%
- YTD
- 9.74%
- 1Y
- 21.89%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
ILB.AX vs. GNDQ.AX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
ILB.AX iShares Government Inflation ETF | 1.74% | 2.96% | -0.51% |
GNDQ.AX Betashares Wealth Builder Nasdaq 100 Geared (30-40% LVR) Complex ETF | 9.74% | 15.96% | 17.76% |
Correlation
The correlation between ILB.AX and GNDQ.AX is 0.09, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.09 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 15, 2024 | 0.05 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ILB.AX vs. GNDQ.AX — Risk / Return Rank
ILB.AX
GNDQ.AX
ILB.AX vs. GNDQ.AX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Government Inflation ETF (ILB.AX) and Betashares Wealth Builder Nasdaq 100 Geared (30-40% LVR) Complex ETF (GNDQ.AX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| ILB.AX | GNDQ.AX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.38 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.54 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.10 | 1.17 | -0.07 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.63 | 0.92 | -0.29 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.44 | 2.29 | -0.85 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
ILB.AX vs. GNDQ.AX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ILB.AX drawdown since its inception was -17.45%, smaller than the maximum GNDQ.AX drawdown of -30.89%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ILB.AX and GNDQ.AX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ILB.AX | GNDQ.AX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -17.45% | -30.89% | +13.44% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -4.40% | -23.50% | +19.10% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -4.40% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -17.45% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -17.45% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.94% | -9.40% | +8.46% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.58% | -6.91% | +3.33% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.95% | 9.51% | -7.56% |
Volatility
ILB.AX vs. GNDQ.AX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares Government Inflation ETF (ILB.AX) is 0.80%, while Betashares Wealth Builder Nasdaq 100 Geared (30-40% LVR) Complex ETF (GNDQ.AX) has a volatility of 8.57%. This indicates that ILB.AX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GNDQ.AX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ILB.AX | GNDQ.AX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.80% | 8.57% | -7.77% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 3.48% | 18.07% | -14.59% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 5.05% | 23.33% | -18.28% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 7.37% | 29.55% | -22.18% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 7.33% | 29.55% | -22.22% |
Dividends
ILB.AX vs. GNDQ.AX - Dividend Comparison
ILB.AX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.64%, more than GNDQ.AX's 1.56% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GNDQ.AX Betashares Wealth Builder Nasdaq 100 Geared (30-40% LVR) Complex ETF | 1.56% | 0.92% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
ILB.AX iShares Government Inflation ETF | 1.64% | 1.56% | 1.65% | 1.56% | 0.85% | 0.53% | 0.83% | 1.40% | 0.74% | 0.70% | 1.22% | 1.63% |
Frequently Asked Questions
ILB.AX and GNDQ.AX have a correlation of 0.09, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
They also come from different issuers: iShares and BetaShares.
Find the right allocation for ILB.AX and GNDQ.AX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer