PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo

Documentation

Upgrade your plan
IKO.AX vs. GGUS.AX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

IKO.AX vs. GGUS.AX

Last updated Jul 18, 2026
Documentation

IKO.AX (iShares MSCI South Korea ETF (AU)) and GGUS.AX (Betashares Geared US Equities Currency Hedged Complex ETF) are both Global Equities funds. IKO.AX is passively managed, while GGUS.AX is actively managed. Over the past 10 years, IKO.AX returned 14.32%/yr vs 20.86%/yr for GGUS.AX. At a 0.45 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.

Performance

IKO.AX vs. GGUS.AX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a A$10,000 investment in iShares MSCI South Korea ETF (AU) (IKO.AX) and Betashares Geared US Equities Currency Hedged Complex ETF (GGUS.AX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IKO.AX achieves a 56.61% return, which is significantly higher than GGUS.AX's 15.21% return. Over the past 10 years, IKO.AX has underperformed GGUS.AX with an annualized return of 14.32%, while GGUS.AX has yielded a comparatively higher 20.86% annualized return.

IKO.AX

1D
-4.69%
1M
-23.45%
6M
37.47%
YTD
56.61%
1Y
108.64%
3Y*
35.31%
5Y*
15.55%
10Y*
14.32%

GGUS.AX

1D
-2.97%
1M
-2.35%
6M
12.93%
YTD
15.21%
1Y
36.63%
3Y*
29.41%
5Y*
13.72%
10Y*
20.86%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IKO.AX vs. GGUS.AX - Yearly Performance Comparison

2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
IKO.AX
iShares MSCI South Korea ETF (AU)		56.61%80.87%-12.63%16.96%-20.13%-2.25%29.64%7.29%-11.42%30.24%
GGUS.AX
Betashares Geared US Equities Currency Hedged Complex ETF		15.21%18.83%45.64%49.70%-47.20%68.07%17.37%70.51%-21.12%45.08%

Correlation

The correlation between IKO.AX and GGUS.AX is 0.51, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.51

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.46

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.47

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.46

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 17, 2015

0.45

The correlation between IKO.AX and GGUS.AX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.45 to 0.51 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

iShares MSCI South Korea ETF (AU)

Betashares Geared US Equities Currency Hedged Complex ETF

Often compared with IKO.AX:
IKO.AX vs. CORE.AXIKO.AX vs. ESGI.AXIKO.AX vs. ESTX.AXIKO.AX vs. F100.AXIKO.AX vs. GLIN.AXIKO.AX vs. HGEN.AXIKO.AX vs. HJPN.AX
Often compared with GGUS.AX:
GGUS.AX vs. DHHF.AXGGUS.AX vs. EX20.AXGGUS.AX vs. F100.AXGGUS.AX vs. FOOD.AXGGUS.AX vs. FUEL.AXGGUS.AX vs. GEAR.AXGGUS.AX vs. GNDQ.AX

Return for Risk

IKO.AX vs. GGUS.AX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.
IKO.AX
IKO.AX Risk / Return Rank: 8585
Overall Rank
IKO.AX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8989
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IKO.AX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7777
Sortino Ratio Rank
IKO.AX Omega Ratio Rank: 8282
Omega Ratio Rank
IKO.AX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8989
Calmar Ratio Rank
IKO.AX Martin Ratio Rank: 8888
Martin Ratio Rank
GGUS.AX
GGUS.AX Risk / Return Rank: 4646
Overall Rank
GGUS.AX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4343
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GGUS.AX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4242
Sortino Ratio Rank
GGUS.AX Omega Ratio Rank: 4747
Omega Ratio Rank
GGUS.AX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4343
Calmar Ratio Rank
GGUS.AX Martin Ratio Rank: 5454
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IKO.AX vs. GGUS.AX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI South Korea ETF (AU) (IKO.AX) and Betashares Geared US Equities Currency Hedged Complex ETF (GGUS.AX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

IKO.AXGGUS.AXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility
2.26
1.17

+1.08

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk
2.60
1.67

+0.92

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.37

1.23

+0.14

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.01

1.71

+2.30

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

13.84

6.88

+6.95

IKO.AX vs. GGUS.AX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IKO.AX Sharpe Ratio is 2.26, which is higher than the GGUS.AX Sharpe Ratio of 1.17. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IKO.AX and GGUS.AX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Loading charts...

Drawdowns

IKO.AX vs. GGUS.AX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IKO.AX drawdown since its inception was -57.74%, smaller than the maximum GGUS.AX drawdown of -64.26%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IKO.AX and GGUS.AX.

Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators

IKO.AXGGUS.AXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-57.74%

-64.26%

+6.52%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-25.76%

-20.90%

-4.86%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-25.76%

-46.78%

+21.02%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-39.03%

-55.53%

+16.50%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-39.50%

-64.26%

+24.76%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-25.76%

-4.40%

-21.36%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-17.29%

-13.41%

-3.88%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

7.57%

5.25%

+2.32%

Volatility

IKO.AX vs. GGUS.AX - Volatility Comparison

iShares MSCI South Korea ETF (AU) (IKO.AX) has a higher volatility of 21.96% compared to Betashares Geared US Equities Currency Hedged Complex ETF (GGUS.AX) at 6.38%. This indicates that IKO.AX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GGUS.AX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Loading charts...

Volatility by Period

IKO.AXGGUS.AXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

21.96%

6.38%

+15.58%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

42.76%

25.73%

+17.03%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

45.79%

30.52%

+15.27%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

27.07%

41.72%

-14.65%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

23.43%

40.74%

-17.31%

Dividends

IKO.AX vs. GGUS.AX - Dividend Comparison

IKO.AX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.14%, while GGUS.AX has not paid dividends to shareholders.

PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
GGUS.AX
Betashares Geared US Equities Currency Hedged Complex ETF		0.00%1.69%0.00%0.00%6.12%2.52%0.00%0.12%0.96%0.62%0.89%0.00%
IKO.AX
iShares MSCI South Korea ETF (AU)		6.14%0.93%3.03%1.08%1.86%0.87%1.84%1.44%0.00%0.75%1.85%1.07%

Frequently Asked Questions

IKO.AX and GGUS.AX have a correlation of 0.51, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

They also come from different issuers: iShares and BetaShares.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IKO.AX and GGUS.AX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer