PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IKO.AX vs. FUEL.AX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

IKO.AX vs. FUEL.AX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a A$10,000 investment in iShares MSCI South Korea ETF (AU) (IKO.AX) and Betashares Global Energy Companies Currency Hedged ETF (FUEL.AX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IKO.AX achieves a 56.61% return, which is significantly higher than FUEL.AX's 24.77% return. Over the past 10 years, IKO.AX has outperformed FUEL.AX with an annualized return of 14.32%, while FUEL.AX has yielded a comparatively lower 5.97% annualized return.


IKO.AX

1D
-4.69%
1M
-23.45%
6M
37.47%
YTD
56.61%
1Y
108.64%
3Y*
35.31%
5Y*
15.55%
10Y*
14.32%

FUEL.AX

1D
0.25%
1M
2.61%
6M
21.01%
YTD
24.77%
1Y
32.20%
3Y*
13.02%
5Y*
15.37%
10Y*
5.97%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IKO.AX vs. FUEL.AX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
IKO.AX
iShares MSCI South Korea ETF (AU)
56.61%80.87%-12.63%16.96%-20.13%-2.25%29.64%7.29%-11.42%30.24%
FUEL.AX
Betashares Global Energy Companies Currency Hedged ETF
24.77%10.28%-1.04%-2.17%37.74%29.02%-32.28%10.04%-11.41%2.28%

Correlation

The correlation between IKO.AX and FUEL.AX is -0.12, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.12

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.07

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.12

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.21

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 16, 2016

0.21

The correlation between IKO.AX and FUEL.AX shifts across timeframes, from -0.12 (1 year) to 0.21 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IKO.AX vs. FUEL.AX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IKO.AX
IKO.AX Risk / Return Rank: 8585
Overall Rank
IKO.AX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8989
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IKO.AX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7777
Sortino Ratio Rank
IKO.AX Omega Ratio Rank: 8282
Omega Ratio Rank
IKO.AX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8989
Calmar Ratio Rank
IKO.AX Martin Ratio Rank: 8888
Martin Ratio Rank

FUEL.AX
FUEL.AX Risk / Return Rank: 5757
Overall Rank
FUEL.AX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5454
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FUEL.AX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5555
Sortino Ratio Rank
FUEL.AX Omega Ratio Rank: 5757
Omega Ratio Rank
FUEL.AX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6565
Calmar Ratio Rank
FUEL.AX Martin Ratio Rank: 5656
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IKO.AX vs. FUEL.AX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI South Korea ETF (AU) (IKO.AX) and Betashares Global Energy Companies Currency Hedged ETF (FUEL.AX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


IKO.AXFUEL.AXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.86

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.56

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.37

1.27

+0.10

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.01

2.42

+1.59

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

13.84

7.19

+6.65

IKO.AX vs. FUEL.AX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IKO.AX Sharpe Ratio is 2.26, which is higher than the FUEL.AX Sharpe Ratio of 1.40. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IKO.AX and FUEL.AX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

IKO.AX vs. FUEL.AX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IKO.AX drawdown since its inception was -57.74%, smaller than the maximum FUEL.AX drawdown of -65.66%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IKO.AX and FUEL.AX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IKO.AXFUEL.AXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-57.74%

-65.66%

+7.92%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-25.76%

-12.87%

-12.89%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-25.76%

-22.90%

-2.86%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-39.03%

-23.54%

-15.49%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-39.50%

-65.66%

+26.16%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-25.76%

-7.42%

-18.34%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-17.29%

-13.62%

-3.67%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

7.57%

4.40%

+3.17%

Volatility

IKO.AX vs. FUEL.AX - Volatility Comparison

iShares MSCI South Korea ETF (AU) (IKO.AX) has a higher volatility of 21.96% compared to Betashares Global Energy Companies Currency Hedged ETF (FUEL.AX) at 5.61%. This indicates that IKO.AX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FUEL.AX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IKO.AXFUEL.AXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

21.96%

5.61%

+16.35%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

42.76%

19.38%

+23.38%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

45.79%

22.34%

+23.45%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

27.07%

24.25%

+2.82%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

23.43%

26.38%

-2.95%

Dividends

IKO.AX vs. FUEL.AX - Dividend Comparison

IKO.AX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.14%, more than FUEL.AX's 3.36% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FUEL.AX
Betashares Global Energy Companies Currency Hedged ETF
3.36%0.00%2.16%0.00%0.00%4.04%1.64%1.25%1.92%3.02%0.00%0.00%
IKO.AX
iShares MSCI South Korea ETF (AU)
6.14%0.93%3.03%1.08%1.86%0.87%1.84%1.44%0.00%0.75%1.85%1.07%

Frequently Asked Questions


IKO.AX and FUEL.AX have a correlation of -0.12, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

IKO.AX tracks iShares MSCI South Korea Index, while FUEL.AX tracks Betashares Global Energy Companies Currency Hedged Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and BetaShares.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IKO.AX and FUEL.AX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer