IJPH.L vs. IDFF.L
IJPH.L (iShares MSCI Japan GBP Hedged UCITS ETF) and IDFF.L (iShares MSCI AC Far East ex-Japan UCITS ETF) are both Japan Equities funds from iShares - IJPH.L tracks the MSCI Japan 100% Hedged to GBP Index while IDFF.L tracks the iShares MSCI AC Far East ex-Japan UCITS ETF. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, IJPH.L returned 15.19%/yr vs 9.62%/yr for IDFF.L. At a 0.50 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. IJPH.L charges 0.64%/yr vs 0.74%/yr for IDFF.L.
Performance
IJPH.L vs. IDFF.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
IJPH.L is traded in GBP, while IDFF.L is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the IDFF.L values have been converted to GBP using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IJPH.L achieves a 22.15% return, which is significantly lower than IDFF.L's 28.62% return. Over the past 10 years, IJPH.L has outperformed IDFF.L with an annualized return of 15.19%, while IDFF.L has yielded a comparatively lower 9.62% annualized return.
IJPH.L
- 1D
- -1.00%
- 1M
- 1.08%
- 6M
- 14.52%
- YTD
- 22.15%
- 1Y
- 52.01%
- 3Y*
- 28.65%
- 5Y*
- 21.31%
- 10Y*
- 15.19%
IDFF.L
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- -7.57%
- 6M
- 20.19%
- YTD
- 28.62%
- 1Y
- 49.10%
- 3Y*
- 23.30%
- 5Y*
- 7.86%
- 10Y*
- 9.62%
IJPH.L vs. IDFF.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IJPH.L iShares MSCI Japan GBP Hedged UCITS ETF | 22.15% | 29.37% | 23.82% | 34.19% | -4.30% | 11.94% | 9.27% | 15.94% | -15.89% | 19.45% |
IDFF.L iShares MSCI AC Far East ex-Japan UCITS ETF | 28.62% | 29.55% | 14.11% | -3.61% | -12.49% | -8.34% | 22.21% | 12.81% | -10.15% | 29.45% |
Correlation
The correlation between IJPH.L and IDFF.L is 0.58, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.58 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.44 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.44 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.49 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 31, 2012 | 0.50 |
The correlation between IJPH.L and IDFF.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.44 (3 years) to 0.58 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IJPH.L vs. IDFF.L — Risk / Return Rank
IJPH.L
IDFF.L
IJPH.L vs. IDFF.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI Japan GBP Hedged UCITS ETF (IJPH.L) and iShares MSCI AC Far East ex-Japan UCITS ETF (IDFF.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| IJPH.L | IDFF.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.37 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.71 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.44 | 1.38 | +0.06 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 5.37 | 4.40 | +0.97 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 18.17 | 12.07 | +6.11 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
IJPH.L vs. IDFF.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IJPH.L drawdown since its inception was -34.55%, smaller than the maximum IDFF.L drawdown of -51.16%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IJPH.L and IDFF.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IJPH.L | IDFF.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -34.55% | -51.16% | +16.61% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.64% | -11.18% | +1.54% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -21.95% | -19.80% | -2.15% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -21.95% | -32.77% | +10.82% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -34.55% | -39.79% | +5.24% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.26% | -11.18% | +7.92% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.43% | -12.96% | +5.53% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.85% | 4.09% | -1.24% |
Volatility
IJPH.L vs. IDFF.L - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares MSCI Japan GBP Hedged UCITS ETF (IJPH.L) is 6.94%, while iShares MSCI AC Far East ex-Japan UCITS ETF (IDFF.L) has a volatility of 10.40%. This indicates that IJPH.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IDFF.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IJPH.L | IDFF.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.94% | 10.40% | -3.46% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 16.78% | 20.87% | -4.09% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 21.08% | 23.62% | -2.54% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 19.22% | 20.66% | -1.44% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.92% | 20.11% | -1.19% |
IJPH.L vs. IDFF.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
IJPH.L has a 0.64% expense ratio, which is lower than IDFF.L's 0.74% expense ratio.
Dividends
IJPH.L vs. IDFF.L - Dividend Comparison
IJPH.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while IDFF.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.10%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IDFF.L iShares MSCI AC Far East ex-Japan UCITS ETF | 1.10% | 1.46% | 1.85% | 1.85% | 2.07% | 1.39% | 1.13% | 1.67% | 2.04% | 1.50% | 1.92% | 2.29% |
IJPH.L iShares MSCI Japan GBP Hedged UCITS ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
IJPH.L and IDFF.L have a correlation of 0.58, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, IJPH.L is cheaper at 0.64% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
IJPH.L is cheaper with a 0.64% expense ratio, compared with 0.74% for IDFF.L.
IJPH.L tracks MSCI Japan 100% Hedged to GBP Index, while IDFF.L tracks iShares MSCI AC Far East ex-Japan UCITS ETF. Their fees differ too: 0.64% for IJPH.L and 0.74% for IDFF.L.
Find the right allocation for IJPH.L and IDFF.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer