PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IJPD.L vs. N4US.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

IJPD.L vs. N4US.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares MSCI Japan USD Hedged UCITS ETF Accumulating (IJPD.L) and Invesco JPX-Nikkei 400 UCITS ETF USD Hedged (Acc) (N4US.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with IJPD.L having a 18.28% return and N4US.L slightly higher at 18.80%. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with IJPD.L having a 15.96% annualized return and N4US.L not far ahead at 16.34%.


IJPD.L

1D
-2.48%
1M
-4.39%
6M
10.41%
YTD
18.28%
1Y
46.30%
3Y*
26.92%
5Y*
21.11%
10Y*
15.96%

N4US.L

1D
-2.01%
1M
-2.75%
6M
11.38%
YTD
18.80%
1Y
45.47%
3Y*
27.49%
5Y*
21.88%
10Y*
16.34%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IJPD.L vs. N4US.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
IJPD.L
iShares MSCI Japan USD Hedged UCITS ETF Accumulating
18.28%29.04%24.14%35.59%-3.08%12.22%10.80%18.74%-14.26%20.81%
N4US.L
Invesco JPX-Nikkei 400 UCITS ETF USD Hedged (Acc)
18.80%30.25%23.77%35.97%-1.05%11.18%10.79%19.49%-15.75%22.99%

Correlation

The correlation between IJPD.L and N4US.L is 0.98 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.98

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.98

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.98

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.97

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 10, 2015

0.97

The correlation between IJPD.L and N4US.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.97 to 0.98 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IJPD.L vs. N4US.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IJPD.L
IJPD.L Risk / Return Rank: 8989
Overall Rank
IJPD.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8787
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IJPD.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 8686
Sortino Ratio Rank
IJPD.L Omega Ratio Rank: 8686
Omega Ratio Rank
IJPD.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 9393
Calmar Ratio Rank
IJPD.L Martin Ratio Rank: 9191
Martin Ratio Rank

N4US.L
N4US.L Risk / Return Rank: 9090
Overall Rank
N4US.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9090
Sharpe Ratio Rank
N4US.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 8989
Sortino Ratio Rank
N4US.L Omega Ratio Rank: 8888
Omega Ratio Rank
N4US.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 9393
Calmar Ratio Rank
N4US.L Martin Ratio Rank: 9292
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IJPD.L vs. N4US.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI Japan USD Hedged UCITS ETF Accumulating (IJPD.L) and Invesco JPX-Nikkei 400 UCITS ETF USD Hedged (Acc) (N4US.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


IJPD.LN4US.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.11

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.09

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.40

1.42

-0.02

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.95

4.84

+0.10

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

16.11

16.48

-0.37

IJPD.L vs. N4US.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IJPD.L Sharpe Ratio is 2.21, which is comparable to the N4US.L Sharpe Ratio of 2.32. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IJPD.L and N4US.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

IJPD.L vs. N4US.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IJPD.L drawdown since its inception was -31.09%, roughly equal to the maximum N4US.L drawdown of -30.94%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IJPD.L and N4US.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IJPD.LN4US.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-31.09%

-30.94%

-0.15%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.32%

-9.35%

+0.03%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-21.80%

-21.38%

-0.42%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-21.80%

-21.38%

-0.42%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-31.09%

-30.94%

-0.15%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-6.31%

-4.48%

-1.83%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.71%

-6.78%

+0.07%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.87%

2.75%

+0.12%

Volatility

IJPD.L vs. N4US.L - Volatility Comparison

iShares MSCI Japan USD Hedged UCITS ETF Accumulating (IJPD.L) has a higher volatility of 6.81% compared to Invesco JPX-Nikkei 400 UCITS ETF USD Hedged (Acc) (N4US.L) at 6.15%. This indicates that IJPD.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than N4US.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IJPD.LN4US.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.81%

6.15%

+0.66%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

16.69%

15.63%

+1.06%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

20.90%

19.57%

+1.33%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.00%

18.50%

+0.50%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.66%

18.38%

+0.28%

IJPD.L vs. N4US.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

IJPD.L has a 0.64% expense ratio, which is higher than N4US.L's 0.19% expense ratio.


Dividends

IJPD.L vs. N4US.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither IJPD.L nor N4US.L has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.98, IJPD.L and N4US.L move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

On fees, N4US.L is cheaper at 0.19% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

N4US.L is cheaper with a 0.19% expense ratio, compared with 0.64% for IJPD.L.

IJPD.L tracks MSCI Japan 100% Hedged to USD Net TR Index, while N4US.L tracks JPX-Nikkei 400 USD Hedged Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.64% for IJPD.L and 0.19% for N4US.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IJPD.L and N4US.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer