PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IJPD.L vs. JPSG.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

IJPD.L vs. JPSG.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares MSCI Japan USD Hedged UCITS ETF Accumulating (IJPD.L) and iShares MSCI Japan SRI UCITS ETF GBP Hedged (Acc) (JPSG.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

IJPD.L is traded in USD, while JPSG.L is traded in GBP. To make them comparable, the JPSG.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IJPD.L achieves a 18.28% return, which is significantly higher than JPSG.L's 11.80% return.


IJPD.L

1D
-2.48%
1M
-4.39%
6M
10.41%
YTD
18.28%
1Y
46.30%
3Y*
26.92%
5Y*
21.11%
10Y*
15.96%

JPSG.L

1D
-1.64%
1M
4.01%
6M
7.70%
YTD
11.80%
1Y
32.43%
3Y*
20.93%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IJPD.L vs. JPSG.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
IJPD.L
iShares MSCI Japan USD Hedged UCITS ETF Accumulating
18.28%29.04%24.14%29.88%
JPSG.L
iShares MSCI Japan SRI UCITS ETF GBP Hedged (Acc)
11.80%32.57%15.36%25.70%

Correlation

The correlation between IJPD.L and JPSG.L is 0.81, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.81

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.85

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 27, 2023

0.85

The correlation between IJPD.L and JPSG.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.81 to 0.85 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IJPD.L vs. JPSG.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IJPD.L
IJPD.L Risk / Return Rank: 8989
Overall Rank
IJPD.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8787
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IJPD.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 8686
Sortino Ratio Rank
IJPD.L Omega Ratio Rank: 8686
Omega Ratio Rank
IJPD.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 9393
Calmar Ratio Rank
IJPD.L Martin Ratio Rank: 9191
Martin Ratio Rank

JPSG.L
JPSG.L Risk / Return Rank: 7373
Overall Rank
JPSG.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6969
Sharpe Ratio Rank
JPSG.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 7070
Sortino Ratio Rank
JPSG.L Omega Ratio Rank: 6868
Omega Ratio Rank
JPSG.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 8383
Calmar Ratio Rank
JPSG.L Martin Ratio Rank: 7575
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IJPD.L vs. JPSG.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI Japan USD Hedged UCITS ETF Accumulating (IJPD.L) and iShares MSCI Japan SRI UCITS ETF GBP Hedged (Acc) (JPSG.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


IJPD.LJPSG.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.68

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.83

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.40

1.28

+0.12

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.95

2.89

+2.05

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

16.11

9.09

+7.02

IJPD.L vs. JPSG.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IJPD.L Sharpe Ratio is 2.21, which is higher than the JPSG.L Sharpe Ratio of 1.54. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IJPD.L and JPSG.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

IJPD.L vs. JPSG.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IJPD.L drawdown since its inception was -31.09%, which is greater than JPSG.L's maximum drawdown of -20.59%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IJPD.L and JPSG.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IJPD.LJPSG.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-31.09%

-20.59%

-10.50%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.32%

-11.17%

+1.85%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-21.80%

-20.59%

-1.21%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-21.80%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-31.09%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-6.31%

-1.77%

-4.54%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.71%

-3.75%

-2.96%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.87%

3.56%

-0.69%

Volatility

IJPD.L vs. JPSG.L - Volatility Comparison

iShares MSCI Japan USD Hedged UCITS ETF Accumulating (IJPD.L) has a higher volatility of 6.81% compared to iShares MSCI Japan SRI UCITS ETF GBP Hedged (Acc) (JPSG.L) at 5.61%. This indicates that IJPD.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than JPSG.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IJPD.LJPSG.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.81%

5.61%

+1.20%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

16.69%

15.97%

+0.72%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

20.90%

21.11%

-0.21%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.00%

21.03%

-2.03%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.66%

21.03%

-2.37%

IJPD.L vs. JPSG.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

IJPD.L has a 0.64% expense ratio, which is higher than JPSG.L's 0.25% expense ratio.


Dividends

IJPD.L vs. JPSG.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither IJPD.L nor JPSG.L has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


IJPD.L and JPSG.L have a correlation of 0.81, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, JPSG.L is cheaper at 0.25% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

JPSG.L is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.64% for IJPD.L.

IJPD.L tracks MSCI Japan 100% Hedged to USD Net TR Index, while JPSG.L tracks MSCI Japan SRI Select Reduced Fossil Fuel Index. Their fees differ too: 0.64% for IJPD.L and 0.25% for JPSG.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IJPD.L and JPSG.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer