PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IJPD.L vs. IDFF.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

IJPD.L vs. IDFF.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares MSCI Japan USD Hedged UCITS ETF Accumulating (IJPD.L) and iShares MSCI AC Far East ex-Japan UCITS ETF (IDFF.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IJPD.L achieves a 22.10% return, which is significantly lower than IDFF.L's 26.95% return. Over the past 10 years, IJPD.L has outperformed IDFF.L with an annualized return of 16.33%, while IDFF.L has yielded a comparatively lower 9.66% annualized return.


IJPD.L

1D
-1.07%
1M
0.56%
6M
14.39%
YTD
22.10%
1Y
52.00%
3Y*
28.86%
5Y*
21.89%
10Y*
16.33%

IDFF.L

1D
-1.70%
1M
-8.33%
6M
18.87%
YTD
26.95%
1Y
48.14%
3Y*
24.00%
5Y*
7.12%
10Y*
9.66%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IJPD.L vs. IDFF.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
IJPD.L
iShares MSCI Japan USD Hedged UCITS ETF Accumulating
22.10%29.04%24.14%35.59%-3.08%12.22%10.80%18.74%-14.26%20.81%
IDFF.L
iShares MSCI AC Far East ex-Japan UCITS ETF
26.95%39.49%12.16%1.47%-21.79%-9.20%25.91%17.27%-15.18%41.70%

Correlation

The correlation between IJPD.L and IDFF.L is 0.59, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.59

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.45

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.49

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.53

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 30, 2013

0.54

The correlation between IJPD.L and IDFF.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.45 (3 years) to 0.59 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IJPD.L vs. IDFF.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IJPD.L
IJPD.L Risk / Return Rank: 9191
Overall Rank
IJPD.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9191
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IJPD.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 9090
Sortino Ratio Rank
IJPD.L Omega Ratio Rank: 8989
Omega Ratio Rank
IJPD.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 9494
Calmar Ratio Rank
IJPD.L Martin Ratio Rank: 9292
Martin Ratio Rank

IDFF.L
IDFF.L Risk / Return Rank: 7676
Overall Rank
IDFF.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7676
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IDFF.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 6969
Sortino Ratio Rank
IDFF.L Omega Ratio Rank: 7474
Omega Ratio Rank
IDFF.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 8686
Calmar Ratio Rank
IDFF.L Martin Ratio Rank: 7575
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IJPD.L vs. IDFF.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI Japan USD Hedged UCITS ETF Accumulating (IJPD.L) and iShares MSCI AC Far East ex-Japan UCITS ETF (IDFF.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


IJPD.LIDFF.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.56

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.91

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.45

1.35

+0.10

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

5.55

3.79

+1.76

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

18.34

11.11

+7.23

IJPD.L vs. IDFF.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IJPD.L Sharpe Ratio is 2.49, which is comparable to the IDFF.L Sharpe Ratio of 1.93. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IJPD.L and IDFF.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

IJPD.L vs. IDFF.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IJPD.L drawdown since its inception was -31.09%, smaller than the maximum IDFF.L drawdown of -64.08%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IJPD.L and IDFF.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IJPD.LIDFF.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-31.09%

-64.08%

+32.99%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.32%

-12.63%

+3.31%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-21.80%

-19.77%

-2.03%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-21.80%

-43.71%

+21.91%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-31.09%

-50.09%

+19.00%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.28%

-10.89%

+7.61%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.71%

-18.18%

+11.47%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.83%

4.32%

-1.49%

Volatility

IJPD.L vs. IDFF.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares MSCI Japan USD Hedged UCITS ETF Accumulating (IJPD.L) is 6.63%, while iShares MSCI AC Far East ex-Japan UCITS ETF (IDFF.L) has a volatility of 10.68%. This indicates that IJPD.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IDFF.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IJPD.LIDFF.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.63%

10.68%

-4.05%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

16.49%

22.07%

-5.58%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

20.77%

24.77%

-4.00%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.97%

22.32%

-3.35%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.64%

20.81%

-2.17%

IJPD.L vs. IDFF.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

IJPD.L has a 0.64% expense ratio, which is lower than IDFF.L's 0.74% expense ratio.


Dividends

IJPD.L vs. IDFF.L - Dividend Comparison

IJPD.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while IDFF.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.10%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
IDFF.L
iShares MSCI AC Far East ex-Japan UCITS ETF
1.10%1.46%1.85%1.85%2.07%1.39%1.13%1.67%2.04%1.50%1.92%2.29%
IJPD.L
iShares MSCI Japan USD Hedged UCITS ETF Accumulating
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


IJPD.L and IDFF.L have a correlation of 0.59, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, IJPD.L is cheaper at 0.64% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

IJPD.L is cheaper with a 0.64% expense ratio, compared with 0.74% for IDFF.L.

IJPD.L tracks MSCI Japan 100% Hedged to USD Net TR Index, while IDFF.L tracks iShares MSCI AC Far East ex-Japan UCITS ETF. Their fees differ too: 0.64% for IJPD.L and 0.74% for IDFF.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IJPD.L and IDFF.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer