PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IJPD.L vs. ^NDX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

IJPD.L vs. ^NDX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares MSCI Japan USD Hedged UCITS ETF Accumulating (IJPD.L) and NASDAQ 100 Index (^NDX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IJPD.L achieves a 22.38% return, which is significantly higher than ^NDX's 16.60% return. Over the past 10 years, IJPD.L has underperformed ^NDX with an annualized return of 17.57%, while ^NDX has yielded a comparatively higher 21.50% annualized return.


IJPD.L

1D
0.79%
1M
3.23%
YTD
22.38%
6M
22.63%
1Y
54.81%
3Y*
28.66%
5Y*
21.48%
10Y*
17.57%

^NDX

1D
0.75%
1M
-1.87%
YTD
16.60%
6M
14.75%
1Y
32.39%
3Y*
26.08%
5Y*
15.46%
10Y*
21.50%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IJPD.L vs. ^NDX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
IJPD.L
iShares MSCI Japan USD Hedged UCITS ETF Accumulating
22.38%29.04%24.14%35.59%-3.08%12.22%10.80%18.74%-14.26%20.81%
^NDX
NASDAQ 100 Index
16.60%20.17%24.88%53.81%-32.97%26.63%47.58%37.96%-1.04%31.52%

Correlation

The correlation between IJPD.L and ^NDX is 0.44, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.44

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.35

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.37

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.38

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 30, 2013

0.39

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IJPD.L vs. ^NDX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IJPD.L
IJPD.L Risk / Return Rank: 9191
Overall Rank
IJPD.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9090
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IJPD.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 9090
Sortino Ratio Rank
IJPD.L Omega Ratio Rank: 8989
Omega Ratio Rank
IJPD.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 9393
Calmar Ratio Rank
IJPD.L Martin Ratio Rank: 9292
Martin Ratio Rank

^NDX
^NDX Risk / Return Rank: 7777
Overall Rank
^NDX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7878
Sharpe Ratio Rank
^NDX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7777
Sortino Ratio Rank
^NDX Omega Ratio Rank: 7979
Omega Ratio Rank
^NDX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7979
Calmar Ratio Rank
^NDX Martin Ratio Rank: 7474
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IJPD.L vs. ^NDX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI Japan USD Hedged UCITS ETF Accumulating (IJPD.L) and NASDAQ 100 Index (^NDX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


IJPD.L^NDXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.85

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.27

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.49

1.32

+0.17

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

5.85

2.68

+3.17

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

19.83

9.84

+9.99

IJPD.L vs. ^NDX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IJPD.L Sharpe Ratio is 2.66, which is higher than the ^NDX Sharpe Ratio of 1.81. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IJPD.L and ^NDX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

IJPD.L vs. ^NDX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IJPD.L drawdown since its inception was -31.09%, smaller than the maximum ^NDX drawdown of -82.90%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IJPD.L and ^NDX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IJPD.L^NDXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-31.09%

-82.90%

+51.81%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.32%

-12.12%

+2.80%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-21.80%

-22.93%

+1.13%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-21.80%

-35.56%

+13.76%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-31.09%

-35.56%

+4.47%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.05%

-3.98%

+0.93%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.72%

-24.59%

+17.87%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.76%

3.30%

-0.54%

Volatility

IJPD.L vs. ^NDX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares MSCI Japan USD Hedged UCITS ETF Accumulating (IJPD.L) is 6.40%, while NASDAQ 100 Index (^NDX) has a volatility of 8.92%. This indicates that IJPD.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ^NDX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IJPD.L^NDXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.40%

8.92%

-2.52%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

16.21%

14.53%

+1.68%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

20.50%

17.97%

+2.53%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.95%

22.90%

-3.95%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.74%

22.64%

-3.90%

Frequently Asked Questions


IJPD.L and ^NDX have a correlation of 0.44, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IJPD.L and ^NDX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer