PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IJPA.L vs. JPSR.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

IJPA.L vs. JPSR.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares Core MSCI Japan IMI UCITS ETF USD Acc (IJPA.L) and UBS ETF (LU) MSCI Japan Socially Responsible UCITS ETF (JPY) A-dis (JPSR.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

IJPA.L is traded in USD, while JPSR.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the JPSR.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IJPA.L achieves a 15.68% return, which is significantly higher than JPSR.L's 11.00% return. Over the past 10 years, IJPA.L has outperformed JPSR.L with an annualized return of 9.30%, while JPSR.L has yielded a comparatively lower 7.92% annualized return.


IJPA.L

1D
-0.05%
1M
5.18%
YTD
15.68%
6M
16.60%
1Y
32.47%
3Y*
18.69%
5Y*
8.86%
10Y*
9.30%

JPSR.L

1D
-0.17%
1M
7.22%
YTD
11.00%
6M
12.29%
1Y
26.80%
3Y*
14.98%
5Y*
6.33%
10Y*
7.92%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IJPA.L vs. JPSR.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
IJPA.L
iShares Core MSCI Japan IMI UCITS ETF USD Acc
15.68%27.28%6.62%19.34%-16.16%0.16%14.98%18.46%-14.15%25.83%
JPSR.L
UBS ETF (LU) MSCI Japan Socially Responsible UCITS ETF (JPY) A-dis
11.00%27.19%6.83%13.38%-19.49%-4.25%21.47%25.98%-16.36%20.45%

Correlation

The correlation between IJPA.L and JPSR.L is 0.88, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.88

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.91

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.90

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.81

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 29, 2015

0.77

The correlation between IJPA.L and JPSR.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.77 (all time) to 0.91 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

IJPA.L vs. JPSR.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
IJPA.L
JPSR.L

Industrials

25.2%
21.7%

Technology

19.8%
22.8%

Financial Services

15.7%
18.2%

Consumer Cyclical

12.2%
8.1%

Healthcare

5.8%
6.7%

Communication Services

5.7%
13.0%

Basic Materials

5.1%
2.6%

Consumer Defensive

4.0%
2.9%

Real Estate

3.0%
4.0%

Utilities

1.2%

-

Energy

0.9%

-

Industrials

IJPA.L
25.2%
JPSR.L
21.7%

Technology

IJPA.L
19.8%
JPSR.L
22.8%

Financial Services

IJPA.L
15.7%
JPSR.L
18.2%

Consumer Cyclical

IJPA.L
12.2%
JPSR.L
8.1%

Healthcare

IJPA.L
5.8%
JPSR.L
6.7%

Communication Services

IJPA.L
5.7%
JPSR.L
13.0%

Basic Materials

IJPA.L
5.1%
JPSR.L
2.6%

Consumer Defensive

IJPA.L
4.0%
JPSR.L
2.9%

Real Estate

IJPA.L
3.0%
JPSR.L
4.0%

Utilities

IJPA.L
1.2%
JPSR.L

-

Energy

IJPA.L
0.9%
JPSR.L

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IJPA.L vs. JPSR.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IJPA.L
IJPA.L Risk / Return Rank: 5151
Overall Rank
IJPA.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4747
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IJPA.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 5151
Sortino Ratio Rank
IJPA.L Omega Ratio Rank: 5151
Omega Ratio Rank
IJPA.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 5555
Calmar Ratio Rank
IJPA.L Martin Ratio Rank: 5252
Martin Ratio Rank

JPSR.L
JPSR.L Risk / Return Rank: 4949
Overall Rank
JPSR.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4646
Sharpe Ratio Rank
JPSR.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 4545
Sortino Ratio Rank
JPSR.L Omega Ratio Rank: 4848
Omega Ratio Rank
JPSR.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 5353
Calmar Ratio Rank
JPSR.L Martin Ratio Rank: 5151
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IJPA.L vs. JPSR.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Core MSCI Japan IMI UCITS ETF USD Acc (IJPA.L) and UBS ETF (LU) MSCI Japan Socially Responsible UCITS ETF (JPY) A-dis (JPSR.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


IJPA.LJPSR.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.25

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.45

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.31

1.26

+0.05

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.66

2.16

+0.50

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.86

7.08

+1.78

IJPA.L vs. JPSR.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IJPA.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.63, which is comparable to the JPSR.L Sharpe Ratio of 1.38. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IJPA.L and JPSR.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


IJPA.LJPSR.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.63

1.38

+0.25

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.50

0.36

+0.15

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.55

0.50

+0.05

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.46

0.52

-0.05

Drawdowns

IJPA.L vs. JPSR.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IJPA.L drawdown since its inception was -32.47%, smaller than the maximum JPSR.L drawdown of -35.04%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IJPA.L and JPSR.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IJPA.LJPSR.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-32.47%

-35.04%

+2.57%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.15%

-12.54%

+0.39%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-13.96%

-14.63%

+0.67%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-32.47%

-35.04%

+2.57%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-32.47%

-35.04%

+2.57%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.05%

-0.17%

+0.12%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.06%

-10.43%

+2.37%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.66%

3.81%

-0.15%

Volatility

IJPA.L vs. JPSR.L - Volatility Comparison

iShares Core MSCI Japan IMI UCITS ETF USD Acc (IJPA.L) and UBS ETF (LU) MSCI Japan Socially Responsible UCITS ETF (JPY) A-dis (JPSR.L) have volatilities of 4.48% and 4.32%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IJPA.LJPSR.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.48%

4.32%

+0.16%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

16.36%

15.68%

+0.68%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

19.88%

19.60%

+0.28%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.60%

17.88%

-0.28%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.86%

18.47%

-1.61%

IJPA.L vs. JPSR.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

IJPA.L has a 0.12% expense ratio, which is lower than JPSR.L's 0.22% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

IJPA.L vs. JPSR.L - Dividend Comparison

IJPA.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while JPSR.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.03%.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
IJPA.L
iShares Core MSCI Japan IMI UCITS ETF USD Acc
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
JPSR.L
UBS ETF (LU) MSCI Japan Socially Responsible UCITS ETF (JPY) A-dis
1.03%1.74%1.67%1.60%1.71%1.36%1.36%1.51%1.58%1.42%1.16%

Frequently Asked Questions


IJPA.L and JPSR.L have a correlation of 0.88, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, IJPA.L is cheaper at 0.12% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

IJPA.L is cheaper with a 0.12% expense ratio, compared with 0.22% for JPSR.L.

IJPA.L tracks MSCI Japan Investable Market Index (IMI), while JPSR.L tracks TOPIX TR JPY. They also come from different issuers: iShares and UBS. Their fees differ too: 0.12% for IJPA.L and 0.22% for JPSR.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IJPA.L and JPSR.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer