PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IJPA.L vs. HSJP.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

IJPA.L vs. HSJP.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares Core MSCI Japan IMI UCITS ETF USD Acc (IJPA.L) and HSBC Japan Sustainable Equity UCITS ETF USD (HSJP.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

IJPA.L is traded in USD, while HSJP.L is traded in GBP. To make them comparable, the HSJP.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IJPA.L achieves a 15.68% return, which is significantly higher than HSJP.L's 12.94% return.


IJPA.L

1D
-0.05%
1M
5.18%
YTD
15.68%
6M
16.60%
1Y
32.47%
3Y*
18.69%
5Y*
8.86%
10Y*
9.30%

HSJP.L

1D
0.22%
1M
7.27%
YTD
12.94%
6M
14.11%
1Y
28.86%
3Y*
19.73%
5Y*
9.94%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IJPA.L vs. HSJP.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
IJPA.L
iShares Core MSCI Japan IMI UCITS ETF USD Acc
15.68%27.28%6.62%19.34%-16.16%0.16%19.14%
HSJP.L
HSBC Japan Sustainable Equity UCITS ETF USD
12.94%27.16%12.03%19.23%-15.43%3.60%23.31%

Correlation

The correlation between IJPA.L and HSJP.L is 0.92, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.92

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.93

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.92

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 8, 2020

0.92

The correlation between IJPA.L and HSJP.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.92 to 0.93 - a consistent structural relationship.

IJPA.L vs. HSJP.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
IJPA.L
HSJP.L

Industrials

25.2%
19.9%

Technology

19.8%
19.0%

Financial Services

15.7%
20.9%

Consumer Cyclical

12.2%
17.3%

Healthcare

5.8%
5.5%

Communication Services

5.7%
9.6%

Basic Materials

5.1%
1.0%

Consumer Defensive

4.0%
4.3%

Real Estate

3.0%
2.3%

Utilities

1.2%
0.0%

Energy

0.9%
0.1%

Industrials

IJPA.L
25.2%
HSJP.L
19.9%

Technology

IJPA.L
19.8%
HSJP.L
19.0%

Financial Services

IJPA.L
15.7%
HSJP.L
20.9%

Consumer Cyclical

IJPA.L
12.2%
HSJP.L
17.3%

Healthcare

IJPA.L
5.8%
HSJP.L
5.5%

Communication Services

IJPA.L
5.7%
HSJP.L
9.6%

Basic Materials

IJPA.L
5.1%
HSJP.L
1.0%

Consumer Defensive

IJPA.L
4.0%
HSJP.L
4.3%

Real Estate

IJPA.L
3.0%
HSJP.L
2.3%

Utilities

IJPA.L
1.2%
HSJP.L
0.0%

Energy

IJPA.L
0.9%
HSJP.L
0.1%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IJPA.L vs. HSJP.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IJPA.L
IJPA.L Risk / Return Rank: 5151
Overall Rank
IJPA.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4747
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IJPA.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 5151
Sortino Ratio Rank
IJPA.L Omega Ratio Rank: 5151
Omega Ratio Rank
IJPA.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 5555
Calmar Ratio Rank
IJPA.L Martin Ratio Rank: 5252
Martin Ratio Rank

HSJP.L
HSJP.L Risk / Return Rank: 4747
Overall Rank
HSJP.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4747
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HSJP.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 4646
Sortino Ratio Rank
HSJP.L Omega Ratio Rank: 4949
Omega Ratio Rank
HSJP.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 5050
Calmar Ratio Rank
HSJP.L Martin Ratio Rank: 4545
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IJPA.L vs. HSJP.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Core MSCI Japan IMI UCITS ETF USD Acc (IJPA.L) and HSBC Japan Sustainable Equity UCITS ETF USD (HSJP.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


IJPA.LHSJP.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.20

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.38

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.31

1.27

+0.04

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.66

1.95

+0.71

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.86

5.96

+2.90

IJPA.L vs. HSJP.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IJPA.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.63, which is comparable to the HSJP.L Sharpe Ratio of 1.43. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IJPA.L and HSJP.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


IJPA.LHSJP.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.63

1.43

+0.20

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.50

0.55

-0.04

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.55

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.46

0.72

-0.26

Drawdowns

IJPA.L vs. HSJP.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IJPA.L drawdown since its inception was -32.47%, which is greater than HSJP.L's maximum drawdown of -30.78%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IJPA.L and HSJP.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IJPA.LHSJP.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-32.47%

-30.78%

-1.69%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.15%

-14.72%

+2.57%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-13.96%

-14.72%

+0.76%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-32.47%

-30.78%

-1.69%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-32.47%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.05%

-2.00%

+1.95%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.06%

-7.67%

-0.39%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.66%

4.83%

-1.17%

Volatility

IJPA.L vs. HSJP.L - Volatility Comparison

iShares Core MSCI Japan IMI UCITS ETF USD Acc (IJPA.L) has a higher volatility of 4.48% compared to HSBC Japan Sustainable Equity UCITS ETF USD (HSJP.L) at 4.10%. This indicates that IJPA.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than HSJP.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IJPA.LHSJP.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.48%

4.10%

+0.38%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

16.36%

16.25%

+0.11%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

19.88%

20.12%

-0.24%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.60%

18.19%

-0.59%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.86%

17.86%

-1.00%

IJPA.L vs. HSJP.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

IJPA.L has a 0.12% expense ratio, which is lower than HSJP.L's 0.18% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

IJPA.L vs. HSJP.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither IJPA.L nor HSJP.L has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.92, IJPA.L and HSJP.L move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

On fees, IJPA.L is cheaper at 0.12% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

IJPA.L is cheaper with a 0.12% expense ratio, compared with 0.18% for HSJP.L.

IJPA.L tracks MSCI Japan Investable Market Index (IMI), while HSJP.L tracks TOPIX TR JPY. They also come from different issuers: iShares and HSBC. Their fees differ too: 0.12% for IJPA.L and 0.18% for HSJP.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IJPA.L and HSJP.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer