PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo

Documentation

Upgrade your plan
IJH.AX vs. IKO.AX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

IJH.AX vs. IKO.AX

Last updated Jul 18, 2026
Documentation

IJH.AX (iShares S&P Mid-Cap ETF) and IKO.AX (iShares MSCI South Korea ETF (AU)) are both exchange-traded funds - IJH.AX is a Mid Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the iShares S&P Mid-Cap Index, while IKO.AX is a Global Equities fund tracking the iShares MSCI South Korea Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, IJH.AX returned 19.36%/yr vs 14.32%/yr for IKO.AX. At a 0.34 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.

Performance

IJH.AX vs. IKO.AX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a A$10,000 investment in iShares S&P Mid-Cap ETF (IJH.AX) and iShares MSCI South Korea ETF (AU) (IKO.AX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IJH.AX achieves a 8.92% return, which is significantly lower than IKO.AX's 56.61% return. Over the past 10 years, IJH.AX has outperformed IKO.AX with an annualized return of 19.36%, while IKO.AX has yielded a comparatively lower 14.32% annualized return.

IJH.AX

1D
-0.07%
1M
0.38%
6M
3.26%
YTD
8.92%
1Y
12.54%
3Y*
12.34%
5Y*
15.20%
10Y*
19.36%

IKO.AX

1D
-4.69%
1M
-23.45%
6M
37.47%
YTD
56.61%
1Y
108.64%
3Y*
35.31%
5Y*
15.55%
10Y*
14.32%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IJH.AX vs. IKO.AX - Yearly Performance Comparison

2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
IJH.AX
iShares S&P Mid-Cap ETF		8.92%0.34%23.20%16.67%9.71%52.15%25.00%56.41%-4.12%6.48%
IKO.AX
iShares MSCI South Korea ETF (AU)		56.61%80.87%-12.63%16.96%-20.13%-2.25%29.64%7.29%-11.42%30.24%

Correlation

The correlation between IJH.AX and IKO.AX is 0.21, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.21

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.28

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.30

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.34

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 31, 2012

0.34

The correlation between IJH.AX and IKO.AX shifts across timeframes, from 0.21 (1 year) to 0.34 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

iShares S&P Mid-Cap ETF

iShares MSCI South Korea ETF (AU)

Often compared with IJH.AX:
IJH.AX vs. AUMF.AXIJH.AX vs. BILL.AXIJH.AX vs. GLDN.AXIJH.AX vs. GLIN.AXIJH.AX vs. ILB.AXIJH.AX vs. IOZ.AXIJH.AX vs. IVV.AX
Often compared with IKO.AX:
IKO.AX vs. CORE.AXIKO.AX vs. ESGI.AXIKO.AX vs. ESTX.AXIKO.AX vs. F100.AXIKO.AX vs. GLIN.AXIKO.AX vs. HGEN.AXIKO.AX vs. HJPN.AX

Return for Risk

IJH.AX vs. IKO.AX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.
IJH.AX
IJH.AX Risk / Return Rank: 3030
Overall Rank
IJH.AX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3131
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IJH.AX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3030
Sortino Ratio Rank
IJH.AX Omega Ratio Rank: 2929
Omega Ratio Rank
IJH.AX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3030
Calmar Ratio Rank
IJH.AX Martin Ratio Rank: 3232
Martin Ratio Rank
IKO.AX
IKO.AX Risk / Return Rank: 8585
Overall Rank
IKO.AX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8989
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IKO.AX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7777
Sortino Ratio Rank
IKO.AX Omega Ratio Rank: 8282
Omega Ratio Rank
IKO.AX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8989
Calmar Ratio Rank
IKO.AX Martin Ratio Rank: 8888
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IJH.AX vs. IKO.AX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares S&P Mid-Cap ETF (IJH.AX) and iShares MSCI South Korea ETF (AU) (IKO.AX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

IJH.AXIKO.AXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility
0.86
2.26

-1.40

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk
1.28
2.60

-1.32

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.16

1.37

-0.21

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.16

4.01

-2.85

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

3.44

13.84

-10.40

IJH.AX vs. IKO.AX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IJH.AX Sharpe Ratio is 0.86, which is lower than the IKO.AX Sharpe Ratio of 2.26. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IJH.AX and IKO.AX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Loading charts...

Drawdowns

IJH.AX vs. IKO.AX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IJH.AX drawdown since its inception was -34.08%, smaller than the maximum IKO.AX drawdown of -57.74%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IJH.AX and IKO.AX.

Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators

IJH.AXIKO.AXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-34.08%

-57.74%

+23.66%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.43%

-25.76%

+15.33%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-20.00%

-25.76%

+5.76%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-20.00%

-39.03%

+19.03%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-34.08%

-39.50%

+5.42%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.07%

-25.76%

+22.69%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.92%

-17.29%

+13.37%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.58%

7.57%

-3.99%

Volatility

IJH.AX vs. IKO.AX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares S&P Mid-Cap ETF (IJH.AX) is 2.63%, while iShares MSCI South Korea ETF (AU) (IKO.AX) has a volatility of 21.96%. This indicates that IJH.AX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IKO.AX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Loading charts...

Volatility by Period

IJH.AXIKO.AXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.63%

21.96%

-19.33%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.19%

42.76%

-31.57%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.21%

45.79%

-31.58%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.11%

27.07%

-9.96%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.46%

23.43%

-4.97%

Dividends

IJH.AX vs. IKO.AX - Dividend Comparison

IJH.AX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.81%, less than IKO.AX's 6.14% yield.

PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
IJH.AX
iShares S&P Mid-Cap ETF		0.81%0.79%1.13%1.49%16.43%14.04%17.94%19.86%0.00%0.00%3.05%0.00%
IKO.AX
iShares MSCI South Korea ETF (AU)		6.14%0.93%3.03%1.08%1.86%0.87%1.84%1.44%0.00%0.75%1.85%1.07%

Frequently Asked Questions

IJH.AX and IKO.AX have a correlation of 0.21, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

IJH.AX is categorized as Mid Cap Blend Equities, while IKO.AX is Global Equities. IJH.AX tracks iShares S&P Mid-Cap Index, while IKO.AX tracks iShares MSCI South Korea Index.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IJH.AX and IKO.AX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer