IIXIX vs. DBLSX

Last updated Jun 23, 2026

IIXIX (Catalyst Insider Income Fund) and DBLSX (DoubleLine Low Duration Bond Fund) are both Short-Term Bond funds. Over the past 10 years, IIXIX returned 3.41%/yr vs 2.86%/yr for DBLSX. At a 0.22 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. IIXIX charges 0.75%/yr vs 0.41%/yr for DBLSX.

Performance

IIXIX vs. DBLSX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Catalyst Insider Income Fund (IIXIX) and DoubleLine Low Duration Bond Fund (DBLSX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IIXIX achieves a 1.05% return, which is significantly lower than DBLSX's 1.17% return. Over the past 10 years, IIXIX has outperformed DBLSX with an annualized return of 3.41%, while DBLSX has yielded a comparatively lower 2.86% annualized return.

IIXIX

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 0.26%
• YTD: 1.05%
• 6M: 1.62%
• 1Y: 4.10%
• 3Y*: 6.09%
• 5Y*: 2.51%
• 10Y*: 3.41%

DBLSX

• 1D: 0.10%
• 1M: 0.35%
• YTD: 1.17%
• 6M: 1.27%
• 1Y: 4.19%
• 3Y*: 5.48%
• 5Y*: 3.19%
• 10Y*: 2.86%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IIXIX vs. DBLSX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
IIXIX Catalyst Insider Income Fund	1.05%	5.51%	7.10%	8.24%	-8.92%	1.79%	6.60%	5.69%	3.20%	2.13%
DBLSX DoubleLine Low Duration Bond Fund	1.17%	5.74%	5.32%	6.76%	-2.69%	0.70%	2.02%	4.73%	1.40%	2.65%

Correlation

The correlation between IIXIX and DBLSX is 0.40, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.40
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.28
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.32
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.24
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 31, 2014	0.22

The correlation between IIXIX and DBLSX shifts across timeframes, from 0.22 (all time) to 0.40 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

IIXIX vs. DBLSX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IIXIX

IIXIX Risk / Return Rank: 83
IIXIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 57
IIXIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 90
IIXIX Omega Ratio Rank: 92
IIXIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 85
IIXIX Martin Ratio Rank: 90

DBLSX

DBLSX Risk / Return Rank: 97
DBLSX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 98
DBLSX Sortino Ratio Rank: 98
DBLSX Omega Ratio Rank: 98
DBLSX Calmar Ratio Rank: 96
DBLSX Martin Ratio Rank: 98

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IIXIX vs. DBLSX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Catalyst Insider Income Fund (IIXIX) and DoubleLine Low Duration Bond Fund (DBLSX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	IIXIX	DBLSX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.05	3.60	-1.55
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	4.07	5.88	-1.81
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.66	2.01	-0.35
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.82	5.97	-2.15
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	16.53	27.36	-10.83

IIXIX vs. DBLSX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IIXIX Sharpe Ratio is 2.05, which is lower than the DBLSX Sharpe Ratio of 3.60. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IIXIX and DBLSX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

IIXIX vs. DBLSX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IIXIX drawdown since its inception was -11.43%, smaller than the maximum DBLSX drawdown of -57.22%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IIXIX and DBLSX.

Drawdown Indicators

	IIXIX	DBLSX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-11.43%	-57.22%	+45.79%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-1.08%	-0.72%	-0.36%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-1.76%	-0.72%	-1.04%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-11.27%	-4.71%	-6.56%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-11.43%	-57.22%	+45.79%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.11%	-44.94%	+44.83%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-1.84%	-31.55%	+29.71%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.25%	0.16%	+0.09%

Volatility

IIXIX vs. DBLSX - Volatility Comparison

Catalyst Insider Income Fund (IIXIX) has a higher volatility of 0.56% compared to DoubleLine Low Duration Bond Fund (DBLSX) at 0.36%. This indicates that IIXIX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DBLSX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	IIXIX	DBLSX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	0.56%	0.36%	+0.20%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	1.51%	0.92%	+0.59%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.01%	1.20%	+0.81%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	3.41%	1.40%	+2.01%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	3.51%	63.96%	-60.45%

IIXIX vs. DBLSX - Expense Ratio Comparison

IIXIX has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than DBLSX's 0.41% expense ratio.

Dividends

IIXIX vs. DBLSX - Dividend Comparison

IIXIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.68%, more than DBLSX's 4.54% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
DBLSX DoubleLine Low Duration Bond Fund	4.54%	4.64%	5.09%	4.49%	2.50%	1.72%	2.37%	3.21%	2.92%	2.42%	2.52%	2.47%
IIXIX Catalyst Insider Income Fund	4.68%	4.70%	4.05%	4.10%	3.17%	2.40%	3.50%	2.99%	2.41%	2.33%	2.20%	2.22%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both IIXIX and DBLSX in my portfolio?

IIXIX and DBLSX have a correlation of 0.40, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, IIXIX or DBLSX?

IIXIX has higher volatility (0.56%) compared to DBLSX (0.36%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IIXIX dropped -11.43% vs DBLSX's -57.22%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

DBLSX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.60 vs 2.05), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.