IIVGX vs. FGJEX
IIVGX (Voya Growth and Income Portfolio) and FGJEX (Fidelity Advisor Growth & Income Fund Class Z) are both Large Cap Blend Equities funds. Over the past year, IIVGX returned 21.45% vs 23.50% for FGJEX. A 0.78 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. IIVGX charges 0.66%/yr vs 0.46%/yr for FGJEX.
Performance
IIVGX vs. FGJEX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IIVGX achieves a 10.58% return, which is significantly higher than FGJEX's 7.66% return.
IIVGX
- 1D
- 0.70%
- 1M
- 7.99%
- YTD
- 10.58%
- 6M
- 4.35%
- 1Y
- 21.45%
- 3Y*
- 20.02%
- 5Y*
- 12.93%
- 10Y*
- 14.70%
FGJEX
- 1D
- -0.01%
- 1M
- 2.59%
- YTD
- 7.66%
- 6M
- 9.23%
- 1Y
- 23.50%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
IIVGX vs. FGJEX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
IIVGX Voya Growth and Income Portfolio | 10.58% | 19.07% |
FGJEX Fidelity Advisor Growth & Income Fund Class Z | 7.66% | 24.15% |
Correlation
The correlation between IIVGX and FGJEX is 0.76, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.76 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 29, 2025 | 0.78 |
The correlation between IIVGX and FGJEX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.76 to 0.78 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IIVGX vs. FGJEX — Risk / Return Rank
IIVGX
FGJEX
IIVGX vs. FGJEX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Voya Growth and Income Portfolio (IIVGX) and Fidelity Advisor Growth & Income Fund Class Z (FGJEX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| IIVGX | FGJEX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.54 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.90 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.33 | 1.42 | -0.09 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.50 | 2.91 | -1.41 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.56 | 12.20 | -7.64 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| IIVGX | FGJEX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.74 | 2.28 | -0.54 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.76 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.81 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.31 | 2.81 | -2.50 |
Drawdowns
IIVGX vs. FGJEX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IIVGX drawdown since its inception was -65.60%, which is greater than FGJEX's maximum drawdown of -8.32%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IIVGX and FGJEX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IIVGX | FGJEX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -65.60% | -8.32% | -57.28% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -16.12% | -8.32% | -7.80% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -19.16% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -21.65% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -35.04% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -0.01% | +0.01% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -16.98% | -1.06% | -15.92% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.10% | 1.98% | +3.12% |
Volatility
IIVGX vs. FGJEX - Volatility Comparison
Voya Growth and Income Portfolio (IIVGX) has a higher volatility of 3.07% compared to Fidelity Advisor Growth & Income Fund Class Z (FGJEX) at 2.38%. This indicates that IIVGX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FGJEX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IIVGX | FGJEX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.07% | 2.38% | +0.69% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.53% | 7.97% | +3.56% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.91% | 10.65% | +3.26% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.39% | 10.84% | +6.55% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.29% | 10.84% | +7.45% |
IIVGX vs. FGJEX - Expense Ratio Comparison
IIVGX has a 0.66% expense ratio, which is higher than FGJEX's 0.46% expense ratio.
Dividends
IIVGX vs. FGJEX - Dividend Comparison
IIVGX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.82%, less than FGJEX's 9.18% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FGJEX Fidelity Advisor Growth & Income Fund Class Z | 9.18% | 9.59% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
IIVGX Voya Growth and Income Portfolio | 2.82% | 1.34% | 15.44% | 10.54% | 17.53% | 65.29% | 10.87% | 11.92% | 13.24% | 14.09% | 10.56% | 7.46% |
Frequently Asked Questions
IIVGX and FGJEX have a correlation of 0.76, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
IIVGX has higher volatility (3.07%) compared to FGJEX (2.38%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IIVGX dropped -65.60% vs FGJEX's -8.32%.
FGJEX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.28 vs 1.74), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for IIVGX and FGJEX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer