IITU.L vs. UC99.L
IITU.L (iShares S&P 500 Information Technology Sector UCITS ETF USD (Acc)) and UC99.L (UBS ETF (IE) Factor MSCI USA Quality UCITS ETF (USD) A-dis) are both exchange-traded funds - IITU.L is a Technology Equities fund tracking the S&P 500 Capped 35/20 Information Technology Index, while UC99.L is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the Russell 1000 TR USD. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, IITU.L returned 24.78%/yr vs 15.71%/yr for UC99.L. Their correlation of 0.89 suggests significant overlap in exposure. IITU.L charges 0.15%/yr vs 0.25%/yr for UC99.L.
Performance
IITU.L vs. UC99.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IITU.L achieves a 15.62% return, which is significantly higher than UC99.L's 10.79% return. Over the past 10 years, IITU.L has outperformed UC99.L with an annualized return of 24.78%, while UC99.L has yielded a comparatively lower 15.71% annualized return.
IITU.L
- 1D
- 1.20%
- 1M
- -5.66%
- 6M
- 18.73%
- YTD
- 15.62%
- 1Y
- 29.06%
- 3Y*
- 26.87%
- 5Y*
- 21.08%
- 10Y*
- 24.78%
- ALL TIME*
- 20.26%
UC99.L
- 1D
- -0.18%
- 1M
- -0.26%
- 6M
- 10.60%
- YTD
- 10.79%
- 1Y
- 23.86%
- 3Y*
- 17.49%
- 5Y*
- 12.76%
- 10Y*
- 15.71%
- ALL TIME*
- 17.33%
IITU.L vs. UC99.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IITU.L iShares S&P 500 Information Technology Sector UCITS ETF USD (Acc) | 15.62% | 14.44% | 40.85% | 50.70% | -20.63% | 35.67% | 38.34% | 44.21% | 4.28% | 25.57% |
UC99.L UBS ETF (IE) Factor MSCI USA Quality UCITS ETF (USD) A-dis | 10.79% | 9.22% | 23.54% | 28.83% | -14.41% | 29.84% | 17.71% | 33.68% | 1.70% | 14.02% |
Correlation
The correlation between IITU.L and UC99.L is 0.76, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.76 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.84 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.87 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.89 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 20, 2015 | 0.89 |
The correlation between IITU.L and UC99.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.76 (1 year) to 0.89 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
IITU.L vs. UC99.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
IITU.L
UC99.L
Technology
Communication Services
Energy
-
Industrials
Basic Materials
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Financial Services
-
Healthcare
-
Real Estate
-
-
Utilities
-
Technology
IITU.L
UC99.L
Communication Services
IITU.L
UC99.L
Energy
IITU.L
UC99.L
-
Industrials
IITU.L
UC99.L
Basic Materials
IITU.L
-
UC99.L
Consumer Cyclical
IITU.L
-
UC99.L
Consumer Defensive
IITU.L
-
UC99.L
Financial Services
IITU.L
-
UC99.L
Healthcare
IITU.L
-
UC99.L
Real Estate
IITU.L
-
UC99.L
-
Utilities
IITU.L
-
UC99.L
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IITU.L vs. UC99.L — Risk / Return Rank
IITU.L
UC99.L
IITU.L vs. UC99.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares S&P 500 Information Technology Sector UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (IITU.L) and UBS ETF (IE) Factor MSCI USA Quality UCITS ETF (USD) A-dis (UC99.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| IITU.L | UC99.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.54 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.79 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.24 | 1.34 | -0.10 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.73 | 2.56 | -0.83 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.14 | 9.16 | -5.03 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
IITU.L vs. UC99.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IITU.L drawdown since its inception was -41.09%, which is greater than UC99.L's maximum drawdown of -23.04%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IITU.L and UC99.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IITU.L | UC99.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -41.09% | -23.04% | -18.05% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -16.76% | -9.29% | -7.47% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -28.03% | -23.04% | -4.99% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -28.03% | -23.04% | -4.99% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -28.03% | -23.04% | -4.99% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -8.91% | -2.10% | -6.81% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.10% | -4.01% | -4.09% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 7.01% | 2.60% | +4.41% |
Volatility
IITU.L vs. UC99.L - Volatility Comparison
iShares S&P 500 Information Technology Sector UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (IITU.L) has a higher volatility of 7.33% compared to UBS ETF (IE) Factor MSCI USA Quality UCITS ETF (USD) A-dis (UC99.L) at 3.76%. This indicates that IITU.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than UC99.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IITU.L | UC99.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.33% | 3.76% | +3.57% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 16.37% | 9.00% | +7.37% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 21.39% | 12.53% | +8.86% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 26.39% | 16.11% | +10.28% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 23.72% | 16.39% | +7.33% |
IITU.L vs. UC99.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
IITU.L has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is lower than UC99.L's 0.25% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
IITU.L vs. UC99.L - Dividend Comparison
IITU.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while UC99.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.41%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IITU.L iShares S&P 500 Information Technology Sector UCITS ETF USD (Acc) | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
UC99.L UBS ETF (IE) Factor MSCI USA Quality UCITS ETF (USD) A-dis | 0.41% | 0.46% | 0.67% | 0.85% | 0.79% | 0.78% | 0.98% | 0.78% | 1.27% | 0.93% | 1.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
IITU.L and UC99.L have a correlation of 0.76, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, IITU.L is cheaper at 0.15% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
IITU.L is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for UC99.L.
IITU.L is categorized as Technology Equities, while UC99.L is Large Cap Blend Equities. IITU.L tracks S&P 500 Capped 35/20 Information Technology Index, while UC99.L tracks Russell 1000 TR USD. They also come from different issuers: iShares and UBS. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for IITU.L and 0.25% for UC99.L.
Find the right allocation for IITU.L and UC99.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer