PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IITU.L vs. UC99.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

IITU.L vs. UC99.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in iShares S&P 500 Information Technology Sector UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (IITU.L) and UBS ETF (IE) Factor MSCI USA Quality UCITS ETF (USD) A-dis (UC99.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IITU.L achieves a 15.62% return, which is significantly higher than UC99.L's 10.79% return. Over the past 10 years, IITU.L has outperformed UC99.L with an annualized return of 24.78%, while UC99.L has yielded a comparatively lower 15.71% annualized return.


IITU.L

1D
1.20%
1M
-5.66%
6M
18.73%
YTD
15.62%
1Y
29.06%
3Y*
26.87%
5Y*
21.08%
10Y*
24.78%
ALL TIME*
20.26%

UC99.L

1D
-0.18%
1M
-0.26%
6M
10.60%
YTD
10.79%
1Y
23.86%
3Y*
17.49%
5Y*
12.76%
10Y*
15.71%
ALL TIME*
17.33%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IITU.L vs. UC99.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
IITU.L
iShares S&P 500 Information Technology Sector UCITS ETF USD (Acc)
15.62%14.44%40.85%50.70%-20.63%35.67%38.34%44.21%4.28%25.57%
UC99.L
UBS ETF (IE) Factor MSCI USA Quality UCITS ETF (USD) A-dis
10.79%9.22%23.54%28.83%-14.41%29.84%17.71%33.68%1.70%14.02%

Correlation

The correlation between IITU.L and UC99.L is 0.76, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.76

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.84

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.87

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.89

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 20, 2015

0.89

The correlation between IITU.L and UC99.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.76 (1 year) to 0.89 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

IITU.L vs. UC99.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
IITU.L
UC99.L

Technology

99.5%
50.1%

Communication Services

0.5%
3.9%

Energy

0.1%

-

Industrials

0.0%
13.9%

Basic Materials

-

1.7%

Consumer Cyclical

-

2.9%

Consumer Defensive

-

3.6%

Financial Services

-

9.5%

Healthcare

-

14.4%

Real Estate

-

-

Utilities

-

0.1%

Technology

IITU.L
99.5%
UC99.L
50.1%

Communication Services

IITU.L
0.5%
UC99.L
3.9%

Energy

IITU.L
0.1%
UC99.L

-

Industrials

IITU.L
0.0%
UC99.L
13.9%

Basic Materials

IITU.L

-

UC99.L
1.7%

Consumer Cyclical

IITU.L

-

UC99.L
2.9%

Consumer Defensive

IITU.L

-

UC99.L
3.6%

Financial Services

IITU.L

-

UC99.L
9.5%

Healthcare

IITU.L

-

UC99.L
14.4%

Real Estate

IITU.L

-

UC99.L

-

Utilities

IITU.L

-

UC99.L
0.1%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IITU.L vs. UC99.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IITU.L
IITU.L Risk / Return Rank: 4646
Overall Rank
IITU.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5252
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IITU.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 5050
Sortino Ratio Rank
IITU.L Omega Ratio Rank: 4848
Omega Ratio Rank
IITU.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 4444
Calmar Ratio Rank
IITU.L Martin Ratio Rank: 3636
Martin Ratio Rank

UC99.L
UC99.L Risk / Return Rank: 7575
Overall Rank
UC99.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7979
Sharpe Ratio Rank
UC99.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 7979
Sortino Ratio Rank
UC99.L Omega Ratio Rank: 7777
Omega Ratio Rank
UC99.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 6969
Calmar Ratio Rank
UC99.L Martin Ratio Rank: 7070
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IITU.L vs. UC99.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares S&P 500 Information Technology Sector UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (IITU.L) and UBS ETF (IE) Factor MSCI USA Quality UCITS ETF (USD) A-dis (UC99.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


IITU.LUC99.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.54

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.79

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.24

1.34

-0.10

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.73

2.56

-0.83

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.14

9.16

-5.03

IITU.L vs. UC99.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IITU.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.35, which is comparable to the UC99.L Sharpe Ratio of 1.90. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IITU.L and UC99.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

IITU.L vs. UC99.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IITU.L drawdown since its inception was -41.09%, which is greater than UC99.L's maximum drawdown of -23.04%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IITU.L and UC99.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IITU.LUC99.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-41.09%

-23.04%

-18.05%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-16.76%

-9.29%

-7.47%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-28.03%

-23.04%

-4.99%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-28.03%

-23.04%

-4.99%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-28.03%

-23.04%

-4.99%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-8.91%

-2.10%

-6.81%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.10%

-4.01%

-4.09%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

7.01%

2.60%

+4.41%

Volatility

IITU.L vs. UC99.L - Volatility Comparison

iShares S&P 500 Information Technology Sector UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (IITU.L) has a higher volatility of 7.33% compared to UBS ETF (IE) Factor MSCI USA Quality UCITS ETF (USD) A-dis (UC99.L) at 3.76%. This indicates that IITU.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than UC99.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IITU.LUC99.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.33%

3.76%

+3.57%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

16.37%

9.00%

+7.37%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

21.39%

12.53%

+8.86%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

26.39%

16.11%

+10.28%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

23.72%

16.39%

+7.33%

IITU.L vs. UC99.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

IITU.L has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is lower than UC99.L's 0.25% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

IITU.L vs. UC99.L - Dividend Comparison

IITU.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while UC99.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.41%.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
IITU.L
iShares S&P 500 Information Technology Sector UCITS ETF USD (Acc)
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
UC99.L
UBS ETF (IE) Factor MSCI USA Quality UCITS ETF (USD) A-dis
0.41%0.46%0.67%0.85%0.79%0.78%0.98%0.78%1.27%0.93%1.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


IITU.L and UC99.L have a correlation of 0.76, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, IITU.L is cheaper at 0.15% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

IITU.L is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for UC99.L.

IITU.L is categorized as Technology Equities, while UC99.L is Large Cap Blend Equities. IITU.L tracks S&P 500 Capped 35/20 Information Technology Index, while UC99.L tracks Russell 1000 TR USD. They also come from different issuers: iShares and UBS. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for IITU.L and 0.25% for UC99.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IITU.L and UC99.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer