IITU.L vs. MVUS.L
IITU.L (iShares S&P 500 Information Technology Sector UCITS ETF USD (Acc)) and MVUS.L (iShares Edge S&P 500 Minimum Volatility UCITS ETF USD (Acc)) are both exchange-traded funds - IITU.L is a Technology Equities fund tracking the S&P 500 Capped 35/20 Information Technology Index, while MVUS.L is a S&P 500 fund tracking the S&P 500 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, IITU.L returned 26.66%/yr vs 11.06%/yr for MVUS.L. A 0.70 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. IITU.L charges 0.15%/yr vs 0.20%/yr for MVUS.L.
Performance
IITU.L vs. MVUS.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IITU.L achieves a 17.69% return, which is significantly higher than MVUS.L's 3.57% return. Over the past 10 years, IITU.L has outperformed MVUS.L with an annualized return of 26.66%, while MVUS.L has yielded a comparatively lower 11.06% annualized return.
IITU.L
- 1D
- 2.47%
- 1M
- 2.28%
- YTD
- 17.69%
- 6M
- 18.41%
- 1Y
- 44.34%
- 3Y*
- 28.72%
- 5Y*
- 23.93%
- 10Y*
- 26.66%
MVUS.L
- 1D
- 0.55%
- 1M
- 3.31%
- YTD
- 3.57%
- 6M
- 3.97%
- 1Y
- 11.64%
- 3Y*
- 10.73%
- 5Y*
- 9.79%
- 10Y*
- 11.06%
IITU.L vs. MVUS.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IITU.L iShares S&P 500 Information Technology Sector UCITS ETF USD (Acc) | 17.69% | 14.44% | 40.85% | 50.70% | -20.63% | 35.67% | 38.34% | 44.21% | 4.28% | 25.57% |
MVUS.L iShares Edge S&P 500 Minimum Volatility UCITS ETF USD (Acc) | 3.57% | 3.88% | 20.71% | 3.83% | -0.36% | 26.59% | 3.87% | 26.86% | -0.36% | 6.22% |
Correlation
The correlation between IITU.L and MVUS.L is 0.45, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.45 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.52 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.60 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.69 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 20, 2015 | 0.70 |
Over the past year, the correlation between IITU.L and MVUS.L has dropped to 0.45 - well below their long-term average of 0.70, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
IITU.L vs. MVUS.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
IITU.L
MVUS.L
Technology
Energy
Industrials
Basic Materials
-
Communication Services
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Financial Services
-
Healthcare
-
Real Estate
-
Utilities
-
Technology
IITU.L
MVUS.L
Energy
IITU.L
MVUS.L
Industrials
IITU.L
MVUS.L
Basic Materials
IITU.L
-
MVUS.L
Communication Services
IITU.L
-
MVUS.L
Consumer Cyclical
IITU.L
-
MVUS.L
Consumer Defensive
IITU.L
-
MVUS.L
Financial Services
IITU.L
-
MVUS.L
Healthcare
IITU.L
-
MVUS.L
Real Estate
IITU.L
-
MVUS.L
Utilities
IITU.L
-
MVUS.L
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IITU.L vs. MVUS.L — Risk / Return Rank
IITU.L
MVUS.L
IITU.L vs. MVUS.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares S&P 500 Information Technology Sector UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (IITU.L) and iShares Edge S&P 500 Minimum Volatility UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (MVUS.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| IITU.L | MVUS.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.74 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.80 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.36 | 1.25 | +0.11 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.63 | 2.15 | +0.48 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.67 | 6.71 | -0.04 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
IITU.L vs. MVUS.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IITU.L drawdown since its inception was -41.09%, roughly equal to the maximum MVUS.L drawdown of -39.22%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IITU.L and MVUS.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IITU.L | MVUS.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -41.09% | -39.22% | -1.87% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -16.76% | -5.39% | -11.37% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -28.03% | -20.40% | -7.63% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -28.03% | -20.40% | -7.63% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -28.03% | -24.85% | -3.18% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -7.27% | -0.88% | -6.39% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.11% | -7.20% | -0.91% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 6.63% | 1.73% | +4.90% |
Volatility
IITU.L vs. MVUS.L - Volatility Comparison
iShares S&P 500 Information Technology Sector UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (IITU.L) has a higher volatility of 8.62% compared to iShares Edge S&P 500 Minimum Volatility UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (MVUS.L) at 2.80%. This indicates that IITU.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MVUS.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IITU.L | MVUS.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.62% | 2.80% | +5.82% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 15.42% | 5.75% | +9.67% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 20.37% | 8.13% | +12.24% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 26.20% | 18.32% | +7.88% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 23.68% | 16.99% | +6.69% |
IITU.L vs. MVUS.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
IITU.L has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is lower than MVUS.L's 0.20% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
IITU.L vs. MVUS.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither IITU.L nor MVUS.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
IITU.L and MVUS.L have a correlation of 0.45, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, IITU.L is cheaper at 0.15% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
IITU.L is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.20% for MVUS.L.
IITU.L is categorized as Technology Equities, while MVUS.L is S&P 500. IITU.L tracks S&P 500 Capped 35/20 Information Technology Index, while MVUS.L tracks S&P 500 Index. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for IITU.L and 0.20% for MVUS.L.
Find the right allocation for IITU.L and MVUS.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer