IITU.L vs. IUQF.L
IITU.L (iShares S&P 500 Information Technology Sector UCITS ETF USD (Acc)) and IUQF.L (iShares Edge MSCI USA Quality Factor UCITS ETF USD (Acc)) are both exchange-traded funds - IITU.L is a Technology Equities fund tracking the S&P 500 Capped 35/20 Information Technology Index, while IUQF.L is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the Russell 1000 TR USD. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, IITU.L returned 21.08%/yr vs 11.54%/yr for IUQF.L. A 0.78 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. IITU.L charges 0.15%/yr vs 0.20%/yr for IUQF.L.
Performance
IITU.L vs. IUQF.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IITU.L achieves a 15.62% return, which is significantly higher than IUQF.L's 9.58% return.
IITU.L
- 1D
- 1.20%
- 1M
- -5.66%
- 6M
- 18.73%
- YTD
- 15.62%
- 1Y
- 29.06%
- 3Y*
- 26.87%
- 5Y*
- 21.08%
- 10Y*
- 24.78%
- ALL TIME*
- 20.26%
IUQF.L
- 1D
- 0.04%
- 1M
- -0.55%
- 6M
- 8.62%
- YTD
- 9.58%
- 1Y
- 19.40%
- 3Y*
- 15.66%
- 5Y*
- 11.54%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 10.87%
IITU.L vs. IUQF.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IITU.L iShares S&P 500 Information Technology Sector UCITS ETF USD (Acc) | 15.62% | 14.44% | 40.85% | 50.70% | -20.63% | 35.67% | 38.34% | 44.21% | 4.28% | 25.57% |
IUQF.L iShares Edge MSCI USA Quality Factor UCITS ETF USD (Acc) | 9.58% | 4.83% | 24.33% | 23.81% | -11.33% | 29.25% | 12.16% | 29.08% | -2.19% | -8.50% |
Correlation
The correlation between IITU.L and IUQF.L is 0.67, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.67 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.78 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.82 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 13, 2016 | 0.78 |
The correlation between IITU.L and IUQF.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.67 (1 year) to 0.82 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
IITU.L vs. IUQF.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
IITU.L
IUQF.L
Technology
Communication Services
Energy
Industrials
Basic Materials
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Financial Services
-
Healthcare
-
Real Estate
-
Utilities
-
Technology
IITU.L
IUQF.L
Communication Services
IITU.L
IUQF.L
Energy
IITU.L
IUQF.L
Industrials
IITU.L
IUQF.L
Basic Materials
IITU.L
-
IUQF.L
Consumer Cyclical
IITU.L
-
IUQF.L
Consumer Defensive
IITU.L
-
IUQF.L
Financial Services
IITU.L
-
IUQF.L
Healthcare
IITU.L
-
IUQF.L
Real Estate
IITU.L
-
IUQF.L
Utilities
IITU.L
-
IUQF.L
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IITU.L vs. IUQF.L — Risk / Return Rank
IITU.L
IUQF.L
IITU.L vs. IUQF.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares S&P 500 Information Technology Sector UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (IITU.L) and iShares Edge MSCI USA Quality Factor UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (IUQF.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| IITU.L | IUQF.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.52 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.70 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.24 | 1.34 | -0.10 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.73 | 2.91 | -1.18 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.14 | 10.83 | -6.69 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
IITU.L vs. IUQF.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IITU.L drawdown since its inception was -41.09%, which is greater than IUQF.L's maximum drawdown of -25.74%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IITU.L and IUQF.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IITU.L | IUQF.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -41.09% | -25.74% | -15.35% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -16.76% | -6.64% | -10.12% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -28.03% | -20.67% | -7.36% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -28.03% | -20.67% | -7.36% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -28.03% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -8.91% | -2.08% | -6.83% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.10% | -7.45% | -0.65% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 7.01% | 1.79% | +5.22% |
Volatility
IITU.L vs. IUQF.L - Volatility Comparison
iShares S&P 500 Information Technology Sector UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (IITU.L) has a higher volatility of 7.33% compared to iShares Edge MSCI USA Quality Factor UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (IUQF.L) at 3.26%. This indicates that IITU.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IUQF.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IITU.L | IUQF.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.33% | 3.26% | +4.07% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 16.37% | 7.16% | +9.21% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 21.39% | 10.34% | +11.05% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 26.39% | 20.23% | +6.16% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 23.72% | 28.57% | -4.85% |
IITU.L vs. IUQF.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
IITU.L has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is lower than IUQF.L's 0.20% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
IITU.L vs. IUQF.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither IITU.L nor IUQF.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
IITU.L and IUQF.L have a correlation of 0.67, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, IITU.L is cheaper at 0.15% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
IITU.L is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.20% for IUQF.L.
IITU.L is categorized as Technology Equities, while IUQF.L is Large Cap Blend Equities. IITU.L tracks S&P 500 Capped 35/20 Information Technology Index, while IUQF.L tracks Russell 1000 TR USD. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for IITU.L and 0.20% for IUQF.L.
Find the right allocation for IITU.L and IUQF.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer