IITU.L vs. ITPS.L
IITU.L (iShares S&P 500 Information Technology Sector UCITS ETF USD (Acc)) and ITPS.L (iShares $ TIPS UCITS ETF USD (Acc)) are both exchange-traded funds - IITU.L is a Technology Equities fund tracking the S&P 500 Capped 35/20 Information Technology Index, while ITPS.L is a Inflation-Protected Bonds fund tracking the Bloomberg Gbl Infl Linked US TIPS TR USD. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, IITU.L returned 27.26%/yr vs 3.38%/yr for ITPS.L. At a 0.16 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. IITU.L charges 0.15%/yr vs 0.12%/yr for ITPS.L.
Performance
IITU.L vs. ITPS.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
IITU.L is traded in GBp, while ITPS.L is traded in GBP. To make them comparable, the ITPS.L values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IITU.L achieves a 23.25% return, which is significantly higher than ITPS.L's 1.40% return. Over the past 10 years, IITU.L has outperformed ITPS.L with an annualized return of 27.26%, while ITPS.L has yielded a comparatively lower 3.38% annualized return.
IITU.L
- 1D
- -2.08%
- 1M
- 14.24%
- YTD
- 23.25%
- 6M
- 22.00%
- 1Y
- 53.38%
- 3Y*
- 30.94%
- 5Y*
- 25.50%
- 10Y*
- 27.26%
ITPS.L
- 1D
- 0.07%
- 1M
- 0.85%
- YTD
- 1.40%
- 6M
- 0.52%
- 1Y
- 5.75%
- 3Y*
- 1.16%
- 5Y*
- 2.04%
- 10Y*
- 3.38%
IITU.L vs. ITPS.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IITU.L iShares S&P 500 Information Technology Sector UCITS ETF USD (Acc) | 23.25% | 14.44% | 40.85% | 50.70% | -20.63% | 35.67% | 38.34% | 44.21% | 4.28% | 25.57% |
ITPS.L iShares $ TIPS UCITS ETF USD (Acc) | 1.40% | -0.29% | 3.57% | -2.08% | -2.35% | 7.75% | 7.12% | 5.33% | 4.25% | -6.03% |
Correlation
The correlation between IITU.L and ITPS.L is 0.06, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.06 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.05 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.01 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.15 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 24, 2015 | 0.16 |
The correlation between IITU.L and ITPS.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.01 (5 years) to 0.16 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IITU.L vs. ITPS.L — Risk / Return Rank
IITU.L
ITPS.L
IITU.L vs. ITPS.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares S&P 500 Information Technology Sector UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (IITU.L) and iShares $ TIPS UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (ITPS.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| IITU.L | ITPS.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.80 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +2.13 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.44 | 1.16 | +0.29 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.17 | 1.09 | +2.08 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.17 | 2.78 | +5.39 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| IITU.L | ITPS.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.71 | 0.91 | +1.80 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 1.16 | 0.23 | +0.93 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 1.28 | 0.33 | +0.95 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.23 | 0.28 | +0.95 |
Drawdowns
IITU.L vs. ITPS.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IITU.L drawdown since its inception was -28.03%, smaller than the maximum ITPS.L drawdown of -37.27%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IITU.L and ITPS.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IITU.L | ITPS.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -28.03% | -37.27% | +9.24% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -16.76% | -5.26% | -11.50% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -28.03% | -7.85% | -20.18% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -28.03% | -15.72% | -12.31% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -28.03% | -15.72% | -12.31% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.89% | -7.94% | +5.05% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.14% | -10.69% | +5.55% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 6.51% | 2.06% | +4.45% |
Volatility
IITU.L vs. ITPS.L - Volatility Comparison
iShares S&P 500 Information Technology Sector UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (IITU.L) has a higher volatility of 7.01% compared to iShares $ TIPS UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (ITPS.L) at 1.70%. This indicates that IITU.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ITPS.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IITU.L | ITPS.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.01% | 1.70% | +5.31% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 14.45% | 4.63% | +9.82% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 19.60% | 6.30% | +13.30% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 21.94% | 8.76% | +13.18% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.31% | 10.34% | +10.97% |
IITU.L vs. ITPS.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
IITU.L has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is higher than ITPS.L's 0.12% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
IITU.L vs. ITPS.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither IITU.L nor ITPS.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
IITU.L and ITPS.L have a correlation of 0.06, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, ITPS.L is cheaper at 0.12% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
ITPS.L is cheaper with a 0.12% expense ratio, compared with 0.15% for IITU.L.
IITU.L is categorized as Technology Equities, while ITPS.L is Inflation-Protected Bonds. IITU.L tracks S&P 500 Capped 35/20 Information Technology Index, while ITPS.L tracks Bloomberg Gbl Infl Linked US TIPS TR USD. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for IITU.L and 0.12% for ITPS.L.
Find the right allocation for IITU.L and ITPS.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer