PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IITU.L vs. IDTW.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

IITU.L vs. IDTW.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in iShares S&P 500 Information Technology Sector UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (IITU.L) and iShares MSCI Taiwan UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (IDTW.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

IITU.L is traded in GBp, while IDTW.L is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the IDTW.L values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IITU.L achieves a 16.77% return, which is significantly lower than IDTW.L's 60.13% return. Over the past 10 years, IITU.L has outperformed IDTW.L with an annualized return of 25.26%, while IDTW.L has yielded a comparatively lower 20.30% annualized return.


IITU.L

1D
-1.54%
1M
-3.41%
6M
19.28%
YTD
16.77%
1Y
30.62%
3Y*
28.08%
5Y*
21.55%
10Y*
25.26%

IDTW.L

1D
0.00%
1M
-5.60%
6M
52.61%
YTD
60.13%
1Y
85.79%
3Y*
38.65%
5Y*
20.64%
10Y*
20.30%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IITU.L vs. IDTW.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
IITU.L
iShares S&P 500 Information Technology Sector UCITS ETF USD (Acc)
16.77%14.44%40.85%50.70%-20.63%35.67%38.34%44.21%4.28%25.57%
IDTW.L
iShares MSCI Taiwan UCITS ETF USD (Dist)
60.13%22.39%25.77%22.40%-21.17%29.73%30.40%29.33%-3.73%16.98%

Correlation

The correlation between IITU.L and IDTW.L is 0.70, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.70

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.63

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.59

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.59

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 20, 2015

0.59

The correlation between IITU.L and IDTW.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.59 (all time) to 0.70 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IITU.L vs. IDTW.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IITU.L
IITU.L Risk / Return Rank: 4545
Overall Rank
IITU.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5151
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IITU.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 4848
Sortino Ratio Rank
IITU.L Omega Ratio Rank: 4747
Omega Ratio Rank
IITU.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 4444
Calmar Ratio Rank
IITU.L Martin Ratio Rank: 3636
Martin Ratio Rank

IDTW.L
IDTW.L Risk / Return Rank: 9393
Overall Rank
IDTW.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9595
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IDTW.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 9191
Sortino Ratio Rank
IDTW.L Omega Ratio Rank: 9191
Omega Ratio Rank
IDTW.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 9696
Calmar Ratio Rank
IDTW.L Martin Ratio Rank: 9393
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IITU.L vs. IDTW.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares S&P 500 Information Technology Sector UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (IITU.L) and iShares MSCI Taiwan UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (IDTW.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


IITU.LIDTW.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.76

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.82

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.25

1.52

-0.27

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.82

7.56

-5.74

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.40

20.70

-16.30

IITU.L vs. IDTW.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IITU.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.42, which is lower than the IDTW.L Sharpe Ratio of 3.18. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IITU.L and IDTW.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

IITU.L vs. IDTW.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IITU.L drawdown since its inception was -41.09%, smaller than the maximum IDTW.L drawdown of -47.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IITU.L and IDTW.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IITU.LIDTW.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-41.09%

-47.00%

+5.91%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-16.76%

-11.21%

-5.55%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-28.03%

-29.91%

+1.88%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-28.03%

-30.18%

+2.15%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-28.03%

-30.18%

+2.15%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-8.00%

-11.21%

+3.21%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.09%

-9.11%

+1.02%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

6.94%

4.10%

+2.84%

Volatility

IITU.L vs. IDTW.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares S&P 500 Information Technology Sector UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (IITU.L) is 7.43%, while iShares MSCI Taiwan UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (IDTW.L) has a volatility of 11.22%. This indicates that IITU.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IDTW.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IITU.LIDTW.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.43%

11.22%

-3.79%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

16.54%

23.14%

-6.60%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

21.54%

26.69%

-5.15%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

26.39%

22.44%

+3.95%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

23.71%

21.75%

+1.96%

IITU.L vs. IDTW.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

IITU.L has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is lower than IDTW.L's 0.74% expense ratio.


Dividends

IITU.L vs. IDTW.L - Dividend Comparison

IITU.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while IDTW.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.96%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
IDTW.L
iShares MSCI Taiwan UCITS ETF USD (Dist)
0.96%1.51%1.43%2.09%3.39%1.35%1.73%2.15%2.78%2.70%3.10%3.33%
IITU.L
iShares S&P 500 Information Technology Sector UCITS ETF USD (Acc)
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


IITU.L and IDTW.L have a correlation of 0.70, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, IITU.L is cheaper at 0.15% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

IITU.L is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.74% for IDTW.L.

IITU.L tracks S&P 500 Capped 35/20 Information Technology Index, while IDTW.L tracks iShares MSCI Taiwan UCITS ETF USD (Dist). Their fees differ too: 0.15% for IITU.L and 0.74% for IDTW.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IITU.L and IDTW.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer