IITU.L vs. IBTA.L
IITU.L (iShares S&P 500 Information Technology Sector UCITS ETF USD (Acc)) and IBTA.L (iShares USD Treasury Bond 1-3yr UCITS ETF (Acc)) are both exchange-traded funds - IITU.L is a Technology Equities fund tracking the S&P 500 Capped 35/20 Information Technology Index, while IBTA.L is a Government Bonds fund tracking the ICE US Treasury 1-3 Year Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, IITU.L returned 22.73%/yr vs 2.95%/yr for IBTA.L. At a 0.12 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. IITU.L charges 0.15%/yr vs 0.07%/yr for IBTA.L.
Performance
IITU.L vs. IBTA.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
IITU.L is traded in GBp, while IBTA.L is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the IBTA.L values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IITU.L achieves a 17.02% return, which is significantly higher than IBTA.L's 2.61% return.
IITU.L
- 1D
- -1.82%
- 1M
- -2.19%
- YTD
- 17.02%
- 6M
- 17.25%
- 1Y
- 39.79%
- 3Y*
- 29.16%
- 5Y*
- 22.73%
- 10Y*
- 26.33%
IBTA.L
- 1D
- -0.22%
- 1M
- 2.24%
- YTD
- 2.61%
- 6M
- 3.21%
- 1Y
- 6.74%
- 3Y*
- 3.03%
- 5Y*
- 2.95%
- 10Y*
- —
IITU.L vs. IBTA.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IITU.L iShares S&P 500 Information Technology Sector UCITS ETF USD (Acc) | 17.02% | 14.44% | 40.85% | 50.70% | -20.63% | 35.67% | 38.34% | 44.21% | 4.28% | 16.50% |
IBTA.L iShares USD Treasury Bond 1-3yr UCITS ETF (Acc) | 2.61% | -2.17% | 5.89% | -1.00% | 7.69% | 0.30% | 0.11% | -0.32% | 7.41% | -7.63% |
Correlation
The correlation between IITU.L and IBTA.L is 0.06, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.06 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.09 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.02 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 13, 2017 | 0.12 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IITU.L vs. IBTA.L — Risk / Return Rank
IITU.L
IBTA.L
IITU.L vs. IBTA.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares S&P 500 Information Technology Sector UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (IITU.L) and iShares USD Treasury Bond 1-3yr UCITS ETF (Acc) (IBTA.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| IITU.L | IBTA.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.87 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.00 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.32 | 1.18 | +0.14 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.36 | 1.26 | +1.11 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.92 | 3.46 | +2.45 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
IITU.L vs. IBTA.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IITU.L drawdown since its inception was -41.09%, which is greater than IBTA.L's maximum drawdown of -18.45%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IITU.L and IBTA.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IITU.L | IBTA.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -41.09% | -18.45% | -22.64% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -16.76% | -5.34% | -11.42% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -28.03% | -9.28% | -18.75% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -28.03% | -16.66% | -11.37% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -28.03% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -7.80% | -6.21% | -1.59% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.10% | -8.99% | +0.89% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 6.71% | 1.94% | +4.77% |
Volatility
IITU.L vs. IBTA.L - Volatility Comparison
iShares S&P 500 Information Technology Sector UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (IITU.L) has a higher volatility of 8.67% compared to iShares USD Treasury Bond 1-3yr UCITS ETF (Acc) (IBTA.L) at 1.59%. This indicates that IITU.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IBTA.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IITU.L | IBTA.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.67% | 1.59% | +7.08% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 15.74% | 5.00% | +10.74% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 20.82% | 6.51% | +14.31% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 26.28% | 8.28% | +18.00% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 23.66% | 8.54% | +15.12% |
IITU.L vs. IBTA.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
IITU.L has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is higher than IBTA.L's 0.07% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
IITU.L vs. IBTA.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither IITU.L nor IBTA.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
IITU.L and IBTA.L have a correlation of 0.06, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, IBTA.L is cheaper at 0.07% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
IBTA.L is cheaper with a 0.07% expense ratio, compared with 0.15% for IITU.L.
IITU.L is categorized as Technology Equities, while IBTA.L is Government Bonds. IITU.L tracks S&P 500 Capped 35/20 Information Technology Index, while IBTA.L tracks ICE US Treasury 1-3 Year Index. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for IITU.L and 0.07% for IBTA.L.
Find the right allocation for IITU.L and IBTA.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer