IITU.L vs. CUKS.L
IITU.L (iShares S&P 500 Information Technology Sector UCITS ETF USD (Acc)) and CUKS.L (iShares MSCI UK Small Cap UCITS ETF (Acc)) are both exchange-traded funds - IITU.L is a Technology Equities fund tracking the S&P 500 Capped 35/20 Information Technology Index, while CUKS.L is a Europe Equities fund tracking the FTSE Small Cap Ex Invest Trust TR GBP. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, IITU.L returned 27.26%/yr vs 4.74%/yr for CUKS.L. At a 0.43 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. IITU.L charges 0.15%/yr vs 0.58%/yr for CUKS.L.
Performance
IITU.L vs. CUKS.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IITU.L achieves a 23.25% return, which is significantly higher than CUKS.L's 3.10% return. Over the past 10 years, IITU.L has outperformed CUKS.L with an annualized return of 27.26%, while CUKS.L has yielded a comparatively lower 4.74% annualized return.
IITU.L
- 1D
- -2.08%
- 1M
- 14.24%
- YTD
- 23.25%
- 6M
- 22.00%
- 1Y
- 53.38%
- 3Y*
- 30.94%
- 5Y*
- 25.50%
- 10Y*
- 27.26%
CUKS.L
- 1D
- 0.83%
- 1M
- 1.29%
- YTD
- 3.10%
- 6M
- 5.42%
- 1Y
- 10.87%
- 3Y*
- 9.93%
- 5Y*
- 1.23%
- 10Y*
- 4.74%
IITU.L vs. CUKS.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IITU.L iShares S&P 500 Information Technology Sector UCITS ETF USD (Acc) | 23.25% | 14.44% | 40.85% | 50.70% | -20.63% | 35.67% | 38.34% | 44.21% | 4.28% | 25.57% |
CUKS.L iShares MSCI UK Small Cap UCITS ETF (Acc) | 3.10% | 14.90% | 5.74% | 9.76% | -22.81% | 14.33% | -6.24% | 29.73% | -15.36% | 20.13% |
Correlation
The correlation between IITU.L and CUKS.L is 0.32, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.32 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.32 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.41 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.43 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 24, 2015 | 0.43 |
The correlation between IITU.L and CUKS.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.32 (1 year) to 0.43 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
IITU.L vs. CUKS.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
IITU.L
CUKS.L
Technology
Energy
Industrials
Basic Materials
-
Communication Services
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Financial Services
-
Healthcare
-
Real Estate
-
Utilities
-
Technology
IITU.L
CUKS.L
Energy
IITU.L
CUKS.L
Industrials
IITU.L
CUKS.L
Basic Materials
IITU.L
-
CUKS.L
Communication Services
IITU.L
-
CUKS.L
Consumer Cyclical
IITU.L
-
CUKS.L
Consumer Defensive
IITU.L
-
CUKS.L
Financial Services
IITU.L
-
CUKS.L
Healthcare
IITU.L
-
CUKS.L
Real Estate
IITU.L
-
CUKS.L
Utilities
IITU.L
-
CUKS.L
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IITU.L vs. CUKS.L — Risk / Return Rank
IITU.L
CUKS.L
IITU.L vs. CUKS.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares S&P 500 Information Technology Sector UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (IITU.L) and iShares MSCI UK Small Cap UCITS ETF (Acc) (CUKS.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| IITU.L | CUKS.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.92 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +2.25 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.44 | 1.15 | +0.29 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.17 | 0.86 | +2.31 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.17 | 2.79 | +5.38 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| IITU.L | CUKS.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.71 | 0.79 | +1.92 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 1.16 | 0.08 | +1.08 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 1.28 | 0.28 | +1.00 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.23 | 0.47 | +0.76 |
Drawdowns
IITU.L vs. CUKS.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IITU.L drawdown since its inception was -28.03%, smaller than the maximum CUKS.L drawdown of -42.42%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IITU.L and CUKS.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IITU.L | CUKS.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -28.03% | -42.42% | +14.39% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -16.76% | -12.28% | -4.48% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -28.03% | -16.88% | -11.15% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -28.03% | -35.35% | +7.32% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -28.03% | -42.42% | +14.39% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.89% | -3.63% | +0.74% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.14% | -9.28% | +4.14% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 6.51% | 3.80% | +2.71% |
Volatility
IITU.L vs. CUKS.L - Volatility Comparison
iShares S&P 500 Information Technology Sector UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (IITU.L) has a higher volatility of 7.01% compared to iShares MSCI UK Small Cap UCITS ETF (Acc) (CUKS.L) at 4.14%. This indicates that IITU.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CUKS.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IITU.L | CUKS.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.01% | 4.14% | +2.87% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 14.45% | 11.09% | +3.36% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 19.60% | 13.40% | +6.20% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 21.94% | 15.99% | +5.95% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.31% | 17.02% | +4.29% |
IITU.L vs. CUKS.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
IITU.L has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is lower than CUKS.L's 0.58% expense ratio.
Dividends
IITU.L vs. CUKS.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither IITU.L nor CUKS.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
IITU.L and CUKS.L have a correlation of 0.32, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, IITU.L is cheaper at 0.15% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
IITU.L is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.58% for CUKS.L.
IITU.L is categorized as Technology Equities, while CUKS.L is Europe Equities. IITU.L tracks S&P 500 Capped 35/20 Information Technology Index, while CUKS.L tracks FTSE Small Cap Ex Invest Trust TR GBP. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for IITU.L and 0.58% for CUKS.L.
Find the right allocation for IITU.L and CUKS.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer