PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IITU.L vs. CSP1.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

IITU.L vs. CSP1.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in iShares S&P 500 Information Technology Sector UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (IITU.L) and iShares Core S&P 500 UCITS ETF (CSP1.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IITU.L achieves a 23.25% return, which is significantly higher than CSP1.L's 10.55% return. Over the past 10 years, IITU.L has outperformed CSP1.L with an annualized return of 27.26%, while CSP1.L has yielded a comparatively lower 16.07% annualized return.


IITU.L

1D
-2.08%
1M
14.24%
YTD
23.25%
6M
22.00%
1Y
53.38%
3Y*
30.94%
5Y*
25.50%
10Y*
27.26%

CSP1.L

1D
0.05%
1M
5.54%
YTD
10.55%
6M
10.48%
1Y
29.13%
3Y*
19.02%
5Y*
14.94%
10Y*
16.07%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IITU.L vs. CSP1.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
IITU.L
iShares S&P 500 Information Technology Sector UCITS ETF USD (Acc)
23.25%14.44%40.85%50.70%-20.63%35.67%38.34%44.21%4.28%25.57%
CSP1.L
iShares Core S&P 500 UCITS ETF
10.55%9.37%27.35%19.79%-9.05%31.07%13.65%26.42%0.01%10.83%

Correlation

The correlation between IITU.L and CSP1.L is 0.84, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.84

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.85

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.86

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.87

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 24, 2015

0.87

The correlation between IITU.L and CSP1.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.84 to 0.87 - a consistent structural relationship.

IITU.L vs. CSP1.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
IITU.L
CSP1.L

Technology

99.6%
38.0%

Energy

0.1%
3.4%

Industrials

0.0%
7.9%

Basic Materials

-

1.7%

Communication Services

-

10.7%

Consumer Cyclical

-

9.9%

Consumer Defensive

-

4.7%

Financial Services

-

11.3%

Healthcare

-

8.4%

Real Estate

-

1.9%

Utilities

-

2.2%

Technology

IITU.L
99.6%
CSP1.L
38.0%

Energy

IITU.L
0.1%
CSP1.L
3.4%

Industrials

IITU.L
0.0%
CSP1.L
7.9%

Basic Materials

IITU.L

-

CSP1.L
1.7%

Communication Services

IITU.L

-

CSP1.L
10.7%

Consumer Cyclical

IITU.L

-

CSP1.L
9.9%

Consumer Defensive

IITU.L

-

CSP1.L
4.7%

Financial Services

IITU.L

-

CSP1.L
11.3%

Healthcare

IITU.L

-

CSP1.L
8.4%

Real Estate

IITU.L

-

CSP1.L
1.9%

Utilities

IITU.L

-

CSP1.L
2.2%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IITU.L vs. CSP1.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IITU.L
IITU.L Risk / Return Rank: 7070
Overall Rank
IITU.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8484
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IITU.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 7878
Sortino Ratio Rank
IITU.L Omega Ratio Rank: 7676
Omega Ratio Rank
IITU.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 6565
Calmar Ratio Rank
IITU.L Martin Ratio Rank: 4949
Martin Ratio Rank

CSP1.L
CSP1.L Risk / Return Rank: 8282
Overall Rank
CSP1.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8484
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CSP1.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 8383
Sortino Ratio Rank
CSP1.L Omega Ratio Rank: 8585
Omega Ratio Rank
CSP1.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 8080
Calmar Ratio Rank
CSP1.L Martin Ratio Rank: 7878
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IITU.L vs. CSP1.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares S&P 500 Information Technology Sector UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (IITU.L) and iShares Core S&P 500 UCITS ETF (CSP1.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


IITU.LCSP1.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.02

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.20

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.44

1.51

-0.07

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.17

4.07

-0.90

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.17

14.99

-6.82

IITU.L vs. CSP1.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IITU.L Sharpe Ratio is 2.71, which is comparable to the CSP1.L Sharpe Ratio of 2.73. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IITU.L and CSP1.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


IITU.LCSP1.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.71

2.73

-0.02

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.16

1.04

+0.12

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

1.28

1.03

+0.25

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.23

1.09

+0.13

Drawdowns

IITU.L vs. CSP1.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IITU.L drawdown since its inception was -28.03%, which is greater than CSP1.L's maximum drawdown of -25.48%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IITU.L and CSP1.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IITU.LCSP1.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-28.03%

-25.48%

-2.55%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-16.76%

-7.12%

-9.64%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-28.03%

-20.77%

-7.26%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-28.03%

-20.77%

-7.26%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-28.03%

-25.48%

-2.55%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.89%

-0.24%

-2.65%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.14%

-3.32%

-1.82%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

6.51%

1.94%

+4.57%

Volatility

IITU.L vs. CSP1.L - Volatility Comparison

iShares S&P 500 Information Technology Sector UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (IITU.L) has a higher volatility of 7.01% compared to iShares Core S&P 500 UCITS ETF (CSP1.L) at 2.62%. This indicates that IITU.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CSP1.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IITU.LCSP1.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.01%

2.62%

+4.39%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

14.45%

7.16%

+7.29%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

19.60%

10.62%

+8.98%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

21.94%

14.31%

+7.63%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

21.31%

15.57%

+5.74%

IITU.L vs. CSP1.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

IITU.L has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is higher than CSP1.L's 0.07% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

IITU.L vs. CSP1.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither IITU.L nor CSP1.L has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


IITU.L and CSP1.L have a correlation of 0.84, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, CSP1.L is cheaper at 0.07% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

CSP1.L is cheaper with a 0.07% expense ratio, compared with 0.15% for IITU.L.

IITU.L is categorized as Technology Equities, while CSP1.L is S&P 500. IITU.L tracks S&P 500 Capped 35/20 Information Technology Index, while CSP1.L tracks S&P 500 Index. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for IITU.L and 0.07% for CSP1.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IITU.L and CSP1.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer