IISU.L vs. XLIS.L
IISU.L (iShares S&P 500 Industrials Sector UCITS ETF USD (Acc)) and XLIS.L (Invesco Industrials S&P US Select Sector UCITS ETF Acc) are both Industrials Equities funds - IISU.L tracks the S&P 500 Capped 35/20 Industrials Index while XLIS.L tracks the S&P® Select Sector Capped 20% Industrials Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, IISU.L returned 13.38%/yr vs 13.40%/yr for XLIS.L. Their correlation of 0.94 suggests significant overlap in exposure. IISU.L charges 0.15%/yr vs 0.14%/yr for XLIS.L.
Performance
IISU.L vs. XLIS.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
IISU.L is traded in GBp, while XLIS.L is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the XLIS.L values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with IISU.L having a 12.64% return and XLIS.L slightly higher at 13.00%.
IISU.L
- 1D
- -0.05%
- 1M
- 2.79%
- YTD
- 12.64%
- 6M
- 13.01%
- 1Y
- 24.29%
- 3Y*
- 18.78%
- 5Y*
- 13.38%
- 10Y*
- —
XLIS.L
- 1D
- -0.10%
- 1M
- 2.71%
- YTD
- 13.00%
- 6M
- 12.94%
- 1Y
- 24.34%
- 3Y*
- 18.86%
- 5Y*
- 13.40%
- 10Y*
- 14.13%
IISU.L vs. XLIS.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IISU.L iShares S&P 500 Industrials Sector UCITS ETF USD (Acc) | 12.64% | 11.24% | 19.29% | 11.45% | 6.06% | 22.20% | 6.25% | 24.46% | -9.19% | 7.89% |
XLIS.L Invesco Industrials S&P US Select Sector UCITS ETF Acc | 13.00% | 10.85% | 19.35% | 12.03% | 6.10% | 21.68% | 6.68% | 23.83% | -9.15% | 7.88% |
Correlation
The correlation between IISU.L and XLIS.L is 0.95 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.95 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.95 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.94 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 23, 2017 | 0.94 |
The correlation between IISU.L and XLIS.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.94 to 0.95 - a consistent structural relationship.
IISU.L vs. XLIS.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
IISU.L
XLIS.L
Industrials
Utilities
-
Technology
Consumer Cyclical
Basic Materials
-
Communication Services
-
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Energy
-
-
Financial Services
-
-
Healthcare
-
-
Real Estate
-
Industrials
IISU.L
XLIS.L
Utilities
IISU.L
XLIS.L
-
Technology
IISU.L
XLIS.L
Consumer Cyclical
IISU.L
XLIS.L
Basic Materials
IISU.L
XLIS.L
-
Communication Services
IISU.L
-
XLIS.L
-
Consumer Defensive
IISU.L
-
XLIS.L
-
Energy
IISU.L
-
XLIS.L
-
Financial Services
IISU.L
-
XLIS.L
-
Healthcare
IISU.L
-
XLIS.L
-
Real Estate
IISU.L
-
XLIS.L
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IISU.L vs. XLIS.L — Risk / Return Rank
IISU.L
XLIS.L
IISU.L vs. XLIS.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares S&P 500 Industrials Sector UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (IISU.L) and Invesco Industrials S&P US Select Sector UCITS ETF Acc (XLIS.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| IISU.L | XLIS.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.16 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.26 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.32 | 1.29 | +0.03 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.58 | 2.65 | -0.06 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.22 | 8.30 | -0.08 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| IISU.L | XLIS.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.83 | 1.67 | +0.16 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.84 | 0.79 | +0.05 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.74 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.64 | 0.74 | -0.10 |
Drawdowns
IISU.L vs. XLIS.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IISU.L drawdown since its inception was -34.66%, roughly equal to the maximum XLIS.L drawdown of -35.19%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IISU.L and XLIS.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IISU.L | XLIS.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -34.66% | -35.19% | +0.53% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.36% | -9.16% | -0.20% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -21.12% | -21.01% | -0.11% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -21.12% | -21.01% | -0.11% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -35.19% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.34% | -1.05% | -0.29% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.51% | -4.48% | -0.03% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.95% | 2.92% | +0.03% |
Volatility
IISU.L vs. XLIS.L - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares S&P 500 Industrials Sector UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (IISU.L) is 4.54%, while Invesco Industrials S&P US Select Sector UCITS ETF Acc (XLIS.L) has a volatility of 4.99%. This indicates that IISU.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XLIS.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IISU.L | XLIS.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.54% | 4.99% | -0.45% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.37% | 11.63% | -1.26% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.25% | 14.56% | -1.31% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.96% | 16.97% | -1.01% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.65% | 19.06% | -0.41% |
IISU.L vs. XLIS.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
IISU.L has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is higher than XLIS.L's 0.14% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
IISU.L vs. XLIS.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither IISU.L nor XLIS.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.95, IISU.L and XLIS.L move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
On fees, XLIS.L is cheaper at 0.14% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
XLIS.L is cheaper with a 0.14% expense ratio, compared with 0.15% for IISU.L.
IISU.L tracks S&P 500 Capped 35/20 Industrials Index, while XLIS.L tracks S&P® Select Sector Capped 20% Industrials Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for IISU.L and 0.14% for XLIS.L.
Find the right allocation for IISU.L and XLIS.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer