IISU.L vs. SWDA.L
IISU.L (iShares S&P 500 Industrials Sector UCITS ETF USD (Acc)) and SWDA.L (iShares Core MSCI World UCITS ETF USD (Acc)) are both exchange-traded funds - IISU.L is a Industrials Equities fund tracking the S&P 500 Capped 35/20 Industrials Index, while SWDA.L is a Global Equities fund tracking the MSCI World Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, IISU.L returned 13.38%/yr vs 13.06%/yr for SWDA.L. A 0.79 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. IISU.L charges 0.15%/yr vs 0.20%/yr for SWDA.L.
Performance
IISU.L vs. SWDA.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IISU.L achieves a 12.64% return, which is significantly higher than SWDA.L's 10.08% return.
IISU.L
- 1D
- -0.05%
- 1M
- 2.79%
- YTD
- 12.64%
- 6M
- 13.01%
- 1Y
- 24.29%
- 3Y*
- 18.78%
- 5Y*
- 13.38%
- 10Y*
- —
SWDA.L
- 1D
- 0.15%
- 1M
- 3.75%
- YTD
- 10.08%
- 6M
- 9.92%
- 1Y
- 27.16%
- 3Y*
- 17.68%
- 5Y*
- 13.06%
- 10Y*
- 13.91%
IISU.L vs. SWDA.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IISU.L iShares S&P 500 Industrials Sector UCITS ETF USD (Acc) | 12.64% | 11.24% | 19.29% | 11.45% | 6.06% | 22.20% | 6.25% | 24.46% | -9.19% | 7.89% |
SWDA.L iShares Core MSCI World UCITS ETF USD (Acc) | 10.08% | 12.64% | 21.11% | 17.59% | -8.33% | 23.64% | 12.25% | 23.03% | -3.78% | 7.87% |
Correlation
The correlation between IISU.L and SWDA.L is 0.68, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.68 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.74 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.76 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 23, 2017 | 0.79 |
The correlation between IISU.L and SWDA.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.68 (1 year) to 0.79 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
IISU.L vs. SWDA.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
IISU.L
SWDA.L
Industrials
Utilities
Technology
Consumer Cyclical
Basic Materials
Communication Services
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Energy
-
Financial Services
-
Healthcare
-
Real Estate
-
Industrials
IISU.L
SWDA.L
Utilities
IISU.L
SWDA.L
Technology
IISU.L
SWDA.L
Consumer Cyclical
IISU.L
SWDA.L
Basic Materials
IISU.L
SWDA.L
Communication Services
IISU.L
-
SWDA.L
Consumer Defensive
IISU.L
-
SWDA.L
Energy
IISU.L
-
SWDA.L
Financial Services
IISU.L
-
SWDA.L
Healthcare
IISU.L
-
SWDA.L
Real Estate
IISU.L
-
SWDA.L
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IISU.L vs. SWDA.L — Risk / Return Rank
IISU.L
SWDA.L
IISU.L vs. SWDA.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares S&P 500 Industrials Sector UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (IISU.L) and iShares Core MSCI World UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (SWDA.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| IISU.L | SWDA.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.84 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.11 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.32 | 1.51 | -0.19 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.58 | 4.14 | -1.56 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.22 | 16.55 | -8.33 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| IISU.L | SWDA.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.83 | 2.66 | -0.84 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.84 | 0.98 | -0.14 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.96 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.64 | 0.88 | -0.25 |
Drawdowns
IISU.L vs. SWDA.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IISU.L drawdown since its inception was -34.66%, which is greater than SWDA.L's maximum drawdown of -25.58%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IISU.L and SWDA.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IISU.L | SWDA.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -34.66% | -25.58% | -9.08% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.36% | -6.55% | -2.81% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -21.12% | -18.50% | -2.62% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -21.12% | -18.50% | -2.62% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -25.58% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.34% | -0.10% | -1.24% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.51% | -3.49% | -1.02% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.95% | 1.64% | +1.31% |
Volatility
IISU.L vs. SWDA.L - Volatility Comparison
iShares S&P 500 Industrials Sector UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (IISU.L) has a higher volatility of 4.54% compared to iShares Core MSCI World UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (SWDA.L) at 2.52%. This indicates that IISU.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SWDA.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IISU.L | SWDA.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.54% | 2.52% | +2.02% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.37% | 7.29% | +3.08% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.25% | 10.19% | +3.06% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.96% | 13.30% | +2.66% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.65% | 14.50% | +4.15% |
IISU.L vs. SWDA.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
IISU.L has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is lower than SWDA.L's 0.20% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
IISU.L vs. SWDA.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither IISU.L nor SWDA.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
IISU.L and SWDA.L have a correlation of 0.68, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, IISU.L is cheaper at 0.15% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
IISU.L is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.20% for SWDA.L.
IISU.L is categorized as Industrials Equities, while SWDA.L is Global Equities. IISU.L tracks S&P 500 Capped 35/20 Industrials Index, while SWDA.L tracks MSCI World Index. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for IISU.L and 0.20% for SWDA.L.
Find the right allocation for IISU.L and SWDA.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer