PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IISU.L vs. PAVE.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

IISU.L vs. PAVE.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in iShares S&P 500 Industrials Sector UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (IISU.L) and Global X U.S. Infrastructure Development UCITS ETF USD Accumulating (PAVE.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

IISU.L is traded in GBp, while PAVE.L is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the PAVE.L values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IISU.L achieves a 20.55% return, which is significantly lower than PAVE.L's 26.03% return.


IISU.L

1D
1.24%
1M
8.07%
YTD
20.55%
6M
20.59%
1Y
33.37%
3Y*
21.00%
5Y*
14.99%
10Y*

PAVE.L

1D
1.29%
1M
8.98%
YTD
26.03%
6M
25.18%
1Y
45.84%
3Y*
24.64%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IISU.L vs. PAVE.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
IISU.L
iShares S&P 500 Industrials Sector UCITS ETF USD (Acc)
20.55%11.24%19.29%11.45%6.06%2.12%
PAVE.L
Global X U.S. Infrastructure Development UCITS ETF USD Accumulating
26.03%11.27%20.02%24.98%4.80%2.64%

Correlation

The correlation between IISU.L and PAVE.L is 0.85, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.85

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.84

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 2, 2021

0.85

The correlation between IISU.L and PAVE.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.84 to 0.85 - a consistent structural relationship.

IISU.L vs. PAVE.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
IISU.L
PAVE.L

Industrials

90.5%
75.1%

Utilities

5.3%
3.2%

Technology

3.5%
1.0%

Consumer Cyclical

0.5%

-

Basic Materials

0.2%
20.1%

Communication Services

-

-

Consumer Defensive

-

0.3%

Energy

-

0.3%

Financial Services

-

-

Healthcare

-

-

Real Estate

-

-

Industrials

IISU.L
90.5%
PAVE.L
75.1%

Utilities

IISU.L
5.3%
PAVE.L
3.2%

Technology

IISU.L
3.5%
PAVE.L
1.0%

Consumer Cyclical

IISU.L
0.5%
PAVE.L

-

Basic Materials

IISU.L
0.2%
PAVE.L
20.1%

Communication Services

IISU.L

-

PAVE.L

-

Consumer Defensive

IISU.L

-

PAVE.L
0.3%

Energy

IISU.L

-

PAVE.L
0.3%

Financial Services

IISU.L

-

PAVE.L

-

Healthcare

IISU.L

-

PAVE.L

-

Real Estate

IISU.L

-

PAVE.L

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IISU.L vs. PAVE.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IISU.L
IISU.L Risk / Return Rank: 8080
Overall Rank
IISU.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8686
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IISU.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 8686
Sortino Ratio Rank
IISU.L Omega Ratio Rank: 8080
Omega Ratio Rank
IISU.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 7878
Calmar Ratio Rank
IISU.L Martin Ratio Rank: 7070
Martin Ratio Rank

PAVE.L
PAVE.L Risk / Return Rank: 7676
Overall Rank
PAVE.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7878
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PAVE.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 8383
Sortino Ratio Rank
PAVE.L Omega Ratio Rank: 7070
Omega Ratio Rank
PAVE.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 7676
Calmar Ratio Rank
PAVE.L Martin Ratio Rank: 7474
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IISU.L vs. PAVE.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares S&P 500 Industrials Sector UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (IISU.L) and Global X U.S. Infrastructure Development UCITS ETF USD Accumulating (PAVE.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


IISU.LPAVE.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.10

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.13

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.41

1.42

-0.01

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.55

4.56

-1.01

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

11.26

16.30

-5.04

IISU.L vs. PAVE.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IISU.L Sharpe Ratio is 2.43, which is comparable to the PAVE.L Sharpe Ratio of 2.53. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IISU.L and PAVE.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

IISU.L vs. PAVE.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IISU.L drawdown since its inception was -35.68%, which is greater than PAVE.L's maximum drawdown of -28.27%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IISU.L and PAVE.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IISU.LPAVE.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-35.68%

-28.27%

-7.41%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.36%

-10.00%

+0.64%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-21.12%

-28.27%

+7.15%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-21.12%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.90%

-5.43%

-3.47%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.96%

2.81%

+0.15%

Volatility

IISU.L vs. PAVE.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares S&P 500 Industrials Sector UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (IISU.L) is 4.63%, while Global X U.S. Infrastructure Development UCITS ETF USD Accumulating (PAVE.L) has a volatility of 5.50%. This indicates that IISU.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PAVE.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IISU.LPAVE.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.63%

5.50%

-0.87%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.92%

14.44%

-3.52%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.69%

18.06%

-4.37%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

21.12%

20.86%

+0.26%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

24.84%

20.86%

+3.98%

IISU.L vs. PAVE.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

IISU.L has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is lower than PAVE.L's 0.47% expense ratio.


Dividends

IISU.L vs. PAVE.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither IISU.L nor PAVE.L has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


IISU.L and PAVE.L have a correlation of 0.85, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, IISU.L is cheaper at 0.15% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

IISU.L is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.47% for PAVE.L.

IISU.L tracks S&P 500 Capped 35/20 Industrials Index, while PAVE.L tracks Indxx U.S. Infrastructure Development v2 Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Global X. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for IISU.L and 0.47% for PAVE.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IISU.L and PAVE.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer