PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IISPX vs. FHCDX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

IISPX vs. FHCDX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Voya Solution 2055 Portfolio (IISPX) and Fidelity Freedom Blend 2060 Fund Class K6 (FHCDX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IISPX achieves a 12.81% return, which is significantly lower than FHCDX's 14.02% return.


IISPX

1D
0.38%
1M
5.91%
YTD
12.81%
6M
13.61%
1Y
28.47%
3Y*
19.80%
5Y*
10.03%
10Y*
11.59%

FHCDX

1D
0.70%
1M
5.47%
YTD
14.02%
6M
15.56%
1Y
31.25%
3Y*
21.56%
5Y*
10.95%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IISPX vs. FHCDX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
IISPX
Voya Solution 2055 Portfolio
12.81%20.07%15.30%20.87%-19.26%17.64%16.42%24.65%-12.49%
FHCDX
Fidelity Freedom Blend 2060 Fund Class K6
14.02%22.85%16.96%20.69%-18.85%16.45%18.05%26.63%-11.79%

Correlation

The correlation between IISPX and FHCDX is 0.89, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.89

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.93

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.95

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 4, 2018

0.96

The correlation between IISPX and FHCDX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.89 to 0.96 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IISPX vs. FHCDX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IISPX
IISPX Risk / Return Rank: 7777
Overall Rank
IISPX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7979
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IISPX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7777
Sortino Ratio Rank
IISPX Omega Ratio Rank: 7373
Omega Ratio Rank
IISPX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7272
Calmar Ratio Rank
IISPX Martin Ratio Rank: 8585
Martin Ratio Rank

FHCDX
FHCDX Risk / Return Rank: 7272
Overall Rank
FHCDX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7474
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FHCDX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6868
Sortino Ratio Rank
FHCDX Omega Ratio Rank: 6969
Omega Ratio Rank
FHCDX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7272
Calmar Ratio Rank
FHCDX Martin Ratio Rank: 7878
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IISPX vs. FHCDX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Voya Solution 2055 Portfolio (IISPX) and Fidelity Freedom Blend 2060 Fund Class K6 (FHCDX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


IISPXFHCDXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.60

2.50

+0.10

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

3.71

3.44

+0.27

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.48

1.46

+0.02

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

3.32

3.29

+0.03

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

16.09

14.62

+1.47

IISPX vs. FHCDX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IISPX Sharpe Ratio is 2.60, which is comparable to the FHCDX Sharpe Ratio of 2.50. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IISPX and FHCDX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


IISPXFHCDXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.60

2.50

+0.10

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.67

0.73

-0.06

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.72

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.65

0.74

-0.08

Drawdowns

IISPX vs. FHCDX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IISPX drawdown since its inception was -34.45%, which is greater than FHCDX's maximum drawdown of -31.28%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IISPX and FHCDX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IISPXFHCDXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-34.45%

-31.28%

-3.17%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.51%

-9.68%

+0.17%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-15.98%

-15.51%

-0.47%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-27.04%

-27.69%

+0.65%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-34.45%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.94%

-5.83%

+0.89%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.89%

2.17%

-0.28%

Volatility

IISPX vs. FHCDX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Voya Solution 2055 Portfolio (IISPX) is 3.49%, while Fidelity Freedom Blend 2060 Fund Class K6 (FHCDX) has a volatility of 4.22%. This indicates that IISPX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FHCDX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IISPXFHCDXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.49%

4.22%

-0.73%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.88%

10.46%

-0.58%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.14%

12.73%

-0.59%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.40%

15.12%

+0.28%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.37%

16.90%

-0.53%

IISPX vs. FHCDX - Expense Ratio Comparison

IISPX has a 0.19% expense ratio, which is lower than FHCDX's 0.29% expense ratio.


Dividends

IISPX vs. FHCDX - Dividend Comparison

IISPX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.61%, more than FHCDX's 3.31% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FHCDX
Fidelity Freedom Blend 2060 Fund Class K6
3.31%2.52%5.51%2.05%5.98%8.10%4.24%3.04%3.50%0.00%0.00%0.00%
IISPX
Voya Solution 2055 Portfolio
7.61%8.58%1.54%5.14%29.36%14.46%6.23%10.08%5.84%2.98%8.44%13.57%

Frequently Asked Questions


IISPX and FHCDX have a correlation of 0.89, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FHCDX has higher volatility (4.22%) compared to IISPX (3.49%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IISPX dropped -34.45% vs FHCDX's -31.28%.

IISPX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.60 vs 2.50), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IISPX and FHCDX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer