IIRSX vs. HFCGX
Compare and contrast key facts about Voya Russell Small Cap Index Portfolio (IIRSX) and Hennessy Cornerstone Growth Fund (HFCGX).
IIRSX is managed by Voya. It was launched on Mar 10, 2008. HFCGX is managed by Hennessy. It was launched on Nov 1, 1996.
Performance
IIRSX vs. HFCGX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
IIRSX vs. HFCGX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IIRSX Voya Russell Small Cap Index Portfolio | 0.87% | 12.84% | 11.14% | 16.61% | -20.58% | 14.32% | 19.15% | 24.63% | -11.26% | 14.32% |
HFCGX Hennessy Cornerstone Growth Fund | 1.53% | 4.78% | 31.45% | 19.58% | -4.97% | 29.94% | 17.73% | 20.70% | -21.39% | 16.60% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IIRSX achieves a 0.87% return, which is significantly lower than HFCGX's 1.53% return. Over the past 10 years, IIRSX has underperformed HFCGX with an annualized return of 9.46%, while HFCGX has yielded a comparatively higher 11.28% annualized return.
IIRSX
- 1D
- 3.49%
- 1M
- -5.87%
- YTD
- 0.87%
- 6M
- 2.80%
- 1Y
- 25.91%
- 3Y*
- 12.83%
- 5Y*
- 3.21%
- 10Y*
- 9.46%
HFCGX
- 1D
- 1.53%
- 1M
- -4.49%
- YTD
- 1.53%
- 6M
- 3.64%
- 1Y
- 10.87%
- 3Y*
- 19.36%
- 5Y*
- 11.46%
- 10Y*
- 11.28%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
IIRSX vs. HFCGX - Expense Ratio Comparison
IIRSX has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is lower than HFCGX's 1.34% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
IIRSX vs. HFCGX — Risk / Return Rank
IIRSX
HFCGX
IIRSX vs. HFCGX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Voya Russell Small Cap Index Portfolio (IIRSX) and Hennessy Cornerstone Growth Fund (HFCGX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| IIRSX | HFCGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.17 | 0.64 | +0.52 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.74 | 1.05 | +0.69 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.23 | 1.15 | +0.08 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.43 | 0.91 | -0.48 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.42 | 3.90 | -2.48 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| IIRSX | HFCGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.17 | 0.64 | +0.52 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.14 | 0.47 | -0.33 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.41 | 0.44 | -0.03 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.25 | 0.38 | -0.13 |
Correlation
The correlation between IIRSX and HFCGX is 0.70, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Dividends
IIRSX vs. HFCGX - Dividend Comparison
IIRSX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 12.20%, while HFCGX has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IIRSX Voya Russell Small Cap Index Portfolio | 12.20% | 12.31% | 7.55% | 5.71% | 11.02% | 0.61% | 6.29% | 12.33% | 8.34% | 7.95% | 12.75% | 11.26% |
HFCGX Hennessy Cornerstone Growth Fund | 0.00% | 0.00% | 14.11% | 0.38% | 3.58% | 26.58% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 10.47% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.11% |
Drawdowns
IIRSX vs. HFCGX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IIRSX drawdown since its inception was -63.18%, roughly equal to the maximum HFCGX drawdown of -62.35%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IIRSX and HFCGX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| IIRSX | HFCGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -63.18% | -62.35% | -0.83% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -14.22% | -13.38% | -0.84% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -32.01% | -26.30% | -5.71% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -42.32% | -54.22% | +11.90% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -7.98% | -5.13% | -2.85% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -11.50% | -15.32% | +3.82% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 7.10% | 3.13% | +3.97% |
Volatility
IIRSX vs. HFCGX - Volatility Comparison
Voya Russell Small Cap Index Portfolio (IIRSX) has a higher volatility of 7.61% compared to Hennessy Cornerstone Growth Fund (HFCGX) at 5.03%. This indicates that IIRSX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than HFCGX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| IIRSX | HFCGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.61% | 5.03% | +2.58% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 14.28% | 9.24% | +5.04% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 25.50% | 18.58% | +6.92% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 23.11% | 24.54% | -1.43% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 23.67% | 25.79% | -2.12% |